Bravo Intercepts 54m at 2.8 g/t PGM+Au + 0.16% Ni, including 5m at 10.7 g/t PGM+Au + 0.40% Ni at Luanga

Original announcement by cnw on

Company
Bravo Mining Corp.
Ticker
BRVO
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Pará State, Brazil
Primary commodity
Platinum
Secondary commodities
Gold, Nickel, Copper, Palladium, Rhodium
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-14 11:37:14 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bravo Mining Corp. announced high-grade PGM+Au and nickel drill results from its Luanga project in Brazil, including 54m at 2.8 g/t PGM+Au and 0.16% Ni, with a higher-grade core of 5m at 10.7 g/t PGM+Au and 0.40% Ni. These infill and step-out drill holes confirm mineralization continuity and extend the deposit at depth, supporting the upgrade of Inferred resources to Indicated and contributing to a planned PFS and updated MRE in 2027.

Reasoning: Bravo Mining's latest drill results from the Luanga project demonstrate strong PGM+Au and nickel mineralization with significant widths, including a bonanza-grade sub-interval. The infill and step-out drilling successfully confirms continuity and extends the deposit at depth, supporting the objective of upgrading Inferred resources and contributing to a planned PFS and updated MRE in 2027.

Positive factors

  • High-grade PGM+Au and nickel intercepts
  • Significant intercept widths
  • Infill drilling confirms mineralization continuity
  • Step-out drilling extends mineralization at depth
  • Results support future resource upgrades (Inferred to Indicated)
  • QP/CP sign-off and comprehensive QA/QC disclosure

Negative factors

  • Reported widths are downhole, and true width is estimated to be less
  • Metal equivalent assumptions (prices, recoveries) are not disclosed

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 134

Atlas analysis — Bravo Mining Corp.: Bravo Intercepts 54m at 2.8 g/t PGM+Au + 0.16% Ni, including 5m at 10.7 g/t PGM+Au + 0.40% Ni at Luanga. 1.31 g/t over 53.85 m; 0.65 g/t over 52.45 m; 0.65 g/t over 52.45 m

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 134. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (134)

DDH26LU321Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Palladium intercept of 0.31 g/t over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Platinum intercept of 0.14 g/t over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · rhodiumGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rhodium intercept of 0.022 g/t over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold intercept of 0.01 g/t over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · nickelGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Nickel sulphide intercept of 0.22% over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
copper
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.8 m
From
206 m
To
219.8 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:206-219.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper sulphide intercept of 0.01% over 13.8m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 13.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Palladium intercept of 0.86 g/t over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Platinum intercept of 0.27 g/t over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · rhodiumGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rhodium intercept of 0.08 g/t over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.080”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold intercept of 0.16 g/t over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · nickelGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Nickel sulphide intercept of 0.42% over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
copper
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper sulphide intercept of 0.1% over 3.43m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · palladiumGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Palladium intercept of 2.22 g/t over 39.75m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 39.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Platinum intercept of 0.66 g/t over 39.75m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 39.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · rhodiumGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rhodium intercept of 0.125 g/t over 39.75m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: 39.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PGM+Au
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold intercept of 0.01 g/t over 39.75m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 39.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
DDH26LU321Luanga · nickelGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU321
Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Hole Depth
430.2 m
Intercept Depth
206 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU321:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central
Easting
658448.19
Northing
9340315.96
CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S
Elevation
260.75 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Nickel sulphide intercept of 0.32% over 39.75m. Part of infill/step-out drilling supporting resource upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width is estimated to be less than reported downhole length

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 39.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes infill drilling aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release states that Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM, serves as the Company's 'qualified person' as defined in NI 43-101, and mentions the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates by SGS Geosol laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Simon Mottram, F.AusIMM (Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy), President of Bravo Mining Corp. who serves as the Company's "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "). Mr. Mottram has verified the technical data and opinions contained in this news release. ... Quality Assurance and Quality Control (" QAQC ") is maintained internally at the lab through rigorous use of internal certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The reported intercept lengths are downhole, and the true thickness is estimated to be less (110% to 120% of true thickness in Central Sector, 105% to 115% in North Sector).

Evidence · text

“Given the orientation of drilling and mineralization, intercepts are estimated at 110% to 120% of true thickness in the Central Sector, and 105% to 115% in the North Sector.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill program includes step-out drilling to extend mineralization at depth and support growth in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“assay results from seven infill and step-out drill holes”

Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Reason: The drilling aims to support an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate to the Indicated category.

Evidence · text

“supporting an upgrade of the Inferred component of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") to the Indicated category.”

PFS-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Reason: The ongoing drill program results will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.

Evidence · text

“The results of the ongoing drill program will form part of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate targeted for Q1 2027 following the planned publication of the Luanga PFS in Q3 2026.”
AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 3.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
3.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.21 m
From
423.66 m
To
425.87 m
Intercept Depth
423.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:423.66-425.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.51 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.51”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
4.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.21 m
From
423.66 m
To
425.87 m
Intercept Depth
423.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:423.66-425.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.28 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.28”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.21 m
From
423.66 m
To
425.87 m
Intercept Depth
423.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:423.66-425.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · palladiumGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.05 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.82 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · palladiumGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
5.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.05 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.05”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · platinumGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.08 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.08”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · palladiumGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.26 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.65 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · palladiumGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.21 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.71 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · palladiumGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.45 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.49 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · palladiumGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.85 m
From
90.2 m
To
144.05 m
Intercept Depth
90.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:90.2-144.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.21 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: DDH26LU336

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · platinumGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.85 m
From
90.2 m
To
144.05 m
Intercept Depth
90.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:90.2-144.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.31 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: DDH26LU336

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.85 m
From
90.2 m
To
144.05 m
Intercept Depth
90.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:90.2-144.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: DDH26LU336

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · palladiumGrade: 3.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.01 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
3.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.01 m
From
104.04 m
To
109.05 m
Intercept Depth
104.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:104.04-109.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.51 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.51”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · platinumGrade: 6.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.01 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
6.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.01 m
From
104.04 m
To
109.05 m
Intercept Depth
104.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:104.04-109.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.07 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.07”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU336Luanga · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.01 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU336
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.01 m
From
104.04 m
To
109.05 m
Intercept Depth
104.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU336:104.04-109.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · palladiumGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.16 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.71 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Intercept Depth
278.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.86 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Intercept Depth
278.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.27 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.43 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.18 m
Intercept Depth
278.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:278.75-282.18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Intercept Depth
310.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.22 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Intercept Depth
310.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.66 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.75 m
From
310.35 m
To
350.1 m
Intercept Depth
310.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:310.35-350.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
369.3 m
To
404.3 m
Intercept Depth
369.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:369.3-404.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.31 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
369.3 m
To
404.3 m
Intercept Depth
369.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:369.3-404.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.27 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
369.3 m
To
404.3 m
Intercept Depth
369.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:369.3-404.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
171.05 m
To
173.15 m
Intercept Depth
171.05 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:171.05-173.15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.9 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
171.05 m
To
173.15 m
Intercept Depth
171.05 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:171.05-173.15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.31 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU322Luanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU322
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
171.05 m
To
173.15 m
Intercept Depth
171.05 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU322:171.05-173.15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: DDH26LU322

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.44 m
From
178.46 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
178.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:178.46-185.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.13 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.44 m
From
178.46 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
178.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:178.46-185.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.33 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.44 m
From
178.46 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
178.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:178.46-185.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.05 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.82 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
206.75 m
To
223.1 m
Intercept Depth
206.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:206.75-223.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
5.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.05 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.05”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.08 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.08”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.62 m
From
216.48 m
To
221.1 m
Intercept Depth
216.48 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:216.48-221.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
From
47.4 m
To
52.65 m
Intercept Depth
47.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:47.4-52.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.39 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
From
47.4 m
To
52.65 m
Intercept Depth
47.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:47.4-52.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.15 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU323Luanga · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU323
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
From
47.4 m
To
52.65 m
Intercept Depth
47.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU323:47.4-52.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: DDH26LU323

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
98.65 m
To
101.8 m
Intercept Depth
98.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:98.65-101.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.57 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.57”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
98.65 m
To
101.8 m
Intercept Depth
98.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:98.65-101.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.31 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
98.65 m
To
101.8 m
Intercept Depth
98.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:98.65-101.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118.85 m
To
122.85 m
Intercept Depth
118.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118.85-122.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.66 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118.85 m
To
122.85 m
Intercept Depth
118.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118.85-122.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.35 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118.85 m
To
122.85 m
Intercept Depth
118.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118.85-122.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.26 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.65 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52.45 m
From
131.85 m
To
184.3 m
Intercept Depth
131.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:131.85-184.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · palladiumGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
28 m
To
30 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:28-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.23 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
28 m
To
30 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:28-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.49 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU325Luanga · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU325
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
28 m
To
30 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU325:28-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: DDH26LU325

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
49 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:49-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.68 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
49 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:49-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.25 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
49 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:49-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118 m
To
122 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118-122
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.52 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118 m
To
122 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118-122
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.18 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
118 m
To
122 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:118-122
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
186 m
To
198 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:186-198
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.66 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
186 m
To
198 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:186-198
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.24 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
186 m
To
198 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:186-198
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.03 m
From
231.37 m
To
237.4 m
Intercept Depth
231.37 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:231.37-237.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.04 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.03 m
From
231.37 m
To
237.4 m
Intercept Depth
231.37 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:231.37-237.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.95 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.03 m
From
231.37 m
To
237.4 m
Intercept Depth
231.37 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:231.37-237.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.21 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.71 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
263.4 m
To
285.4 m
Intercept Depth
263.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:263.4-285.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU326Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU326
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU326:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.07 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: DDH26LU326

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU326Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU326
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU326:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.04 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: DDH26LU326

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU326Luanga · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU326
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU326:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: DDH26LU326

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.1 m
From
71.55 m
To
94.65 m
Intercept Depth
71.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:71.55-94.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.04 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.1 m
From
71.55 m
To
94.65 m
Intercept Depth
71.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:71.55-94.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.36 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.1 m
From
71.55 m
To
94.65 m
Intercept Depth
71.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:71.55-94.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
84.8 m
To
87.8 m
Intercept Depth
84.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:84.8-87.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
84.8 m
To
87.8 m
Intercept Depth
84.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:84.8-87.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.21 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU327Luanga · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU327
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
84.8 m
To
87.8 m
Intercept Depth
84.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU327:84.8-87.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: DDH26LU327

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.77 m
From
235.14 m
To
237.91 m
Intercept Depth
235.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:235.14-237.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.48 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.77 m
From
235.14 m
To
237.91 m
Intercept Depth
235.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:235.14-237.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.12 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.77 m
From
235.14 m
To
237.91 m
Intercept Depth
235.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:235.14-237.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
293.75 m
To
298.85 m
Intercept Depth
293.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:293.75-298.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.74 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
293.75 m
To
298.85 m
Intercept Depth
293.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:293.75-298.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.26 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
293.75 m
To
298.85 m
Intercept Depth
293.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:293.75-298.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.45 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.49 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.95 m
From
302.85 m
To
326.8 m
Intercept Depth
302.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:302.85-326.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
385.8 m
To
424.8 m
Intercept Depth
385.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:385.8-424.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.26 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
385.8 m
To
424.8 m
Intercept Depth
385.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:385.8-424.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.27 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
385.8 m
To
424.8 m
Intercept Depth
385.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:385.8-424.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
432.8 m
To
436.8 m
Intercept Depth
432.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:432.8-436.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.2 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
432.8 m
To
436.8 m
Intercept Depth
432.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:432.8-436.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.7 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
432.8 m
To
436.8 m
Intercept Depth
432.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:432.8-436.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · palladiumGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
243.95 m
To
247.1 m
Intercept Depth
243.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:243.95-247.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.99 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · platinumGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
243.95 m
To
247.1 m
Intercept Depth
243.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:243.95-247.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.19 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH26LU342Luanga · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH26LU342
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
243.95 m
To
247.1 m
Intercept Depth
243.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH26LU342:243.95-247.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: DDH26LU342

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
304.7 m
To
307.7 m
Intercept Depth
304.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:304.7-307.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.69 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
304.7 m
To
307.7 m
Intercept Depth
304.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:304.7-307.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.23 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
304.7 m
To
307.7 m
Intercept Depth
304.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:304.7-307.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.16 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.71 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.65 m
From
374.7 m
To
411.35 m
Intercept Depth
374.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:374.7-411.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
426.35 m
To
429.35 m
Intercept Depth
426.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:426.35-429.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.54 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
426.35 m
To
429.35 m
Intercept Depth
426.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:426.35-429.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.31 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
426.35 m
To
429.35 m
Intercept Depth
426.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:426.35-429.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · palladiumGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
433.35 m
To
471.35 m
Intercept Depth
433.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:433.35-471.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.35 g/t palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · platinumGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
433.35 m
To
471.35 m
Intercept Depth
433.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:433.35-471.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.28 g/t platinum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for platinum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndLuanga · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
BRVO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
433.35 m
To
471.35 m
Intercept Depth
433.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:433.35-471.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
SIRGAS2000_UTM_22S

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.