BLZ: Annual report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Blaze Minerals Ltd
- Ticker
- BLZ
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Unavailable
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Capital raise, Other, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-29 14:49:05 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Blaze Minerals Ltd's annual report for 2026 outlines its mineral exploration activities across multiple regions, including new project acquisitions in Botswana and Uganda, and ongoing capital raising efforts. The company reported a financial loss and withdrew from the Loulombo and Kyara projects, with a material uncertainty noted regarding its ability to continue as a going concern. Exploration highlights include a copper-in-soil anomaly in Botswana and high-grade tungsten samples from a newly acquired Ugandan project.
Reasoning: The annual report details a year of mixed operational and financial performance for Blaze Minerals Ltd. While the company made new project acquisitions and raised capital, it also faced financial challenges, withdrew from certain projects, and reported no significant results from some drilling campaigns, leading to a cautious outlook.
Positive factors
- New project acquisitions in Botswana and Uganda
- Successful capital raises
- High-grade channel and grab samples from Bahati tungsten project
- Copper-in-soil anomaly discovered at Dinokwe
Negative factors
- Material uncertainty regarding going concern
- Withdrawal from Loulombo and Kyara projects
- Impairment of exploration expenditure
- No significant results from Mityana drilling
- Reliance on historical data for some project potential
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 71
Classification and evidence
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The document reports XRF readings and channel samples without disclosing QA/QC procedures, certified labs, or QP/CP sign-off for these specific results.
Evidence · text
“Significant spot XRF readings of grab samples that had visible malachite, chalcopyrite and galena reported 4.17% Cu, 3.66% Cu, 3.16% Cu, 5.52% and Pb 2.79% Pb.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Channel samples are reported with length but no true width or drill orientation, meaning the reported length may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“two exceptionally high grade channel samples of 1.0 metre @ 20.78% WO3 and 0.8 metres @ 20.22% WO3”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document refers to previous ASX announcements for Ntungamo drilling results and Mityana historical lithium values, indicating these are not new assays.
Evidence · text
“Please refer to the ASX releases on 11 June 2025 and 2 September 2025 titled “Ntungamo Drilling Results” for details of all assays.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The value proposition for the Botswana projects is heavily based on their location 'within and adjacent to a world class geological corridor known as the Kalahari Copper Belt' and the Dinokwe project's lithological similarities to the 'Selebi-Phikwe copper-nickel deposit'.
Evidence · text
“The Botswana Projects are within and adjacent to a world class geological corridor known as the Kalahari Copper Belt (KCB), as well as the Limpopo Mobile Belt (LMB), and Molopo Farms Complex (MFC) in Botswana.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The Uganda tungsten projects are described as 'inclusive of, and adjacent to, several high-grade historical producing tungsten mines'.
Evidence · text
“On 3 September 2026 the Company announced it has entered into a binding agreement to acquire up to a 90% interest in two projects in Uganda, inclusive of, and adjacent to, several high-grade historical producing tungsten mines including the Bahati, Nyanga, Bulunga and Buyaga mines.”
Inferred Resourcenegative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The Selebi-Phikwe deposit, used as a regional comparison, is reported as having inferred resources.
Evidence · text
“Selebi-Phikwe copper-nickel deposit (inferred resources of 24.7 Mt at 1.50% Cu and 0.92% Ni)”
Inferred Resourcenegative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The Khoemacau Project Zone 5, used as a regional comparison, is reported as having a significant inferred resource component.
Evidence · text
“64 Mt at 1.8% Cu inferred resources”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 42. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (35)
Fact 1Dinokwe · copperGrade: 288Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Dinokwe
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 288
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- PL046
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The discovery of a significant copper-in-soil anomaly at PL046 suggests potential for new mineralization and warrants further follow-up.
Positive factors
- Discovery of copper-in-soil anomaly
- Significant strike length and width
- Indicative of new style of mineralisation
Evidence · text
“a copper-in-soil anomaly on PL046, with values up to 288ppm Cu reported, extending over approximately 1000m strike by 100m width.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Sunnyside target · nickelGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.64 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sunnyside target
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical drill result from another company, providing regional exploration context rather than new results for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Historical high-grade intercept in the region
Negative factors
- Historical data from another company
Evidence · text
“18.64m @ 0.75% Ni, 0.55% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Sunnyside target · copperGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.64 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sunnyside target
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical drill result from another company, providing regional exploration context rather than new results for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Historical high-grade intercept in the region
Negative factors
- Historical data from another company
Evidence · text
“18.64m @ 0.75% Ni, 0.55% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in grab samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in grab sample
- Visible mineralization
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“4.17% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 5Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 3.66Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.66
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in grab samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in grab sample
- Visible mineralization
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“3.66% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 6Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in grab samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in grab sample
- Visible mineralization
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“3.16% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 7Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 5.52Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.52
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in grab samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead in grab sample
- Visible mineralization
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“5.52%”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 8Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 2.79Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.79
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in grab samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead in grab sample
- Visible mineralization
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“2.79% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 9Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“1.03% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 10Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Lead presence in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“0.17% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 11Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“0.62% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 12Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“0.58% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 13Krokodil Prospect · zincGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade zinc in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade zinc in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“1.05% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 14Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Lead presence in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“0.95% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 15Krokodil Prospect · zincGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“0.68% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 16Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in rock-chip samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong mineralization, though rock-chip samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead in rock-chip sample
Negative factors
- Rock-chip samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“1.83% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 17Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 8.59Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.59
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptionally high-grade copper in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect confirms strong mineralization within the trenching area.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade copper in channel sample
Evidence · text
“8.59% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 18Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Lead presence in channel sample
Evidence · text
“0.38% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 19Krokodil Prospect · zincGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence in channel sample
Evidence · text
“0.23% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 20Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 5.86Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.86
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect confirms strong mineralization within the trenching area.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in channel sample
Evidence · text
“5.86% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 21Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Lead presence in channel sample
Evidence · text
“0.17% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 22Krokodil Prospect · zincGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence in channel sample
Evidence · text
“0.35% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 23Krokodil Prospect · copperGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect confirms strong mineralization within the trenching area.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper in channel sample
Evidence · text
“3.23% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 24Krokodil Prospect · leadGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Krokodil Prospect
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.96
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in channel samples from Krokodil Prospect indicates strong polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead in channel sample
Evidence · text
“2.96% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 25NtungamoNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ntungamo
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 1548 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The completion of a 1,548-meter drilling program at Ntungamo provides geological data for understanding pegmatite geometry and mineralization.
Positive factors
- Completion of drilling program
- Targeting pegmatite bodies
Evidence · text
“A total of five diamond drill holes targeting two pegmatite bodies were completed during the Ntungamo drilling campaign for a total of 1,548 metres.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 26Ntungamo · galliumHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ntungamo
- Commodity
- gallium
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-11T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Assay results from previous drilling confirmed a critical mineral discovery for gallium, indicating potential for the project.
Positive factors
- Confirmation of critical mineral discovery
Negative factors
- Results previously announced
Evidence · text
“Assays results returned for all drill holes confirm a new critical mineral discovery for gallium and rubidium. Please refer to the ASX releases on 11 June 2025 and 2 September 2025 titled “Ntungamo Drilling Results” for details of all assays.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27Ntungamo · rubidiumHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ntungamo
- Commodity
- rubidium
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-11T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Assay results from previous drilling confirmed a critical mineral discovery for rubidium, indicating potential for the project.
Positive factors
- Confirmation of critical mineral discovery
Negative factors
- Results previously announced
Evidence · text
“Assays results returned for all drill holes confirm a new critical mineral discovery for gallium and rubidium. Please refer to the ASX releases on 11 June 2025 and 2 September 2025 titled “Ntungamo Drilling Results” for details of all assays.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 28Mityana · lithiumGrade: 8.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mityana
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lithium values from surface samples indicate potential but are not new results and may not be representative of the deposit.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical lithium values
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results
- Surface samples not representative
Evidence · text
“Lithium oxide values of up to 8.13% Li2O were assayed by Gecko Uganda from amblygonite boulders in waste dumps from historical tantalite mining activities.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 29MityanaNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mityana
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 587 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The drilling program at Mityana did not return significant results, indicating a lack of economic mineralization in the tested areas.
Positive factors
- Drilling completed to test pegmatite
Negative factors
- No significant results returned
Evidence · text
“A total of three (3) diamond drill holes were successfully completed in late December 2024 for a total of 587 meters. All holes were logged, and zones of potential mineralisation sent to ALS in Johannesburg, South Africa, for multi-element analysis following grant of an export permit. Assays have been received with no significant results returned.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 30Bahati · tungstenGrade: 20.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade channel sample from the Bahati mine strongly confirms the project's high-grade tungsten potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade channel sample
- Confirms high-grade potential
Evidence · text
“1.0 metre @ 20.78% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 31Bahati · tungstenGrade: 20.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade channel sample from the Bahati mine strongly confirms the project's high-grade tungsten potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade channel sample
- Confirms high-grade potential
Evidence · text
“0.8 metres @ 20.22% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 32Bahati · tungstenGrade: 3.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade channel sample from the Bahati mine confirms the project's high-grade tungsten potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade channel sample
- Confirms high-grade potential
Evidence · text
“2 metres @ 3.03% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 33Bahati · tungstenGrade: 6.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very high-grade channel sample from the Bahati mine strongly confirms the project's high-grade tungsten potential.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade channel sample
- Confirms high-grade potential
Evidence · text
“1.0 metre @ 6.79% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 34Bahati · tungstenGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade channel sample from the Bahati mine confirms the project's high-grade tungsten potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade channel sample
- Confirms high-grade potential
Evidence · text
“1.0 metre @ 2.27% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 35Bahati · tungstenGrade: 56.23Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade grab sample from the Bahati mine indicates bonanza-grade tungsten potential, though grab samples are not fully representative.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade grab sample
- Confirms bonanza grade potential
Negative factors
- Grab samples are not representative
Evidence · text
“exceptionally high grade grab sample of 56.23% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (7)
inferredSelebi-Phikwe · copperTonnes: 24700000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Selebi-Phikwe
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- Botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:9a42a95e54d9ed01e353
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 24700000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The reference to the Selebi-Phikwe deposit provides regional context but is historical and not a resource for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Reference to nearby significant deposit
Negative factors
- Historical data, not directly related to company's resource
Evidence · text
“Selebi-Phikwe copper-nickel deposit (inferred resources of 24.7 Mt at 1.50% Cu and 0.92% Ni)”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredSelebi-Phikwe · nickelTonnes: 24700000Grade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Selebi-Phikwe
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- Botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:9a42a95e54d9ed01e353
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 24700000
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The reference to the Selebi-Phikwe deposit provides regional context but is historical and not a resource for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Reference to nearby significant deposit
Negative factors
- Historical data, not directly related to company's resource
Evidence · text
“Selebi-Phikwe copper-nickel deposit (inferred resources of 24.7 Mt at 1.50% Cu and 0.92% Ni)”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
measuredKhoemacau Project Zone 5 · copperTonnes: 13000000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khoemacau Project Zone 5
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- Botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:5b2099a98607ca6661ab
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 13000000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The reference to the Khoemacau Project provides regional context but is historical and not a resource for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Reference to nearby significant deposit
Negative factors
- Historical data, not directly related to company's resource
Evidence · text
“13 Mt at 1.8% Cu measured”
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedKhoemacau Project Zone 5 · copperTonnes: 31000000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khoemacau Project Zone 5
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- Botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:86cecc28293dd6ef7fb5
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 31000000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The reference to the Khoemacau Project provides regional context but is historical and not a resource for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Reference to nearby significant deposit
Negative factors
- Historical data, not directly related to company's resource
Evidence · text
“31 Mt at 1.6% Cu indicated”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredKhoemacau Project Zone 5 · copperTonnes: 64000000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khoemacau Project Zone 5
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- botswana
- Reported Region
- Botswana
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:2410b3b3758718ac0aa0
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 64000000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The reference to the Khoemacau Project provides regional context but is historical and not a resource for Blaze Minerals Ltd.
Positive factors
- Reference to nearby significant deposit
Negative factors
- Historical data, not directly related to company's resource
Evidence · text
“64 Mt at 1.8% Cu inferred resources”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 6Bahati Project · tungstenGrade: 1Grade Unit: % WO3Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- Uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:4ad962d579455b50a428
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- % WO3
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical production figures from the Bahati mine indicate past tungsten mineralization, providing context for the new acquisition.
Positive factors
- Historical production and grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not current resource
Evidence · text
“produced ~270 tons of wolfram at a grade of between 1.0% and 2.2% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 7Bahati Project · tungstenGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: % WO3Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bahati Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- uganda
- Reported Region
- Uganda
- Ticker
- BLZ
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:4ad962d579455b50a428
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- % WO3
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical production figures from the Bahati mine indicate past tungsten mineralization, providing context for the new acquisition.
Positive factors
- Historical production and grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not current resource
Evidence · text
“produced ~270 tons of wolfram at a grade of between 1.0% and 2.2% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.