Blue Moon Acquires the Turner Copper-Gold VMS Deposit to Further Advance its Western U.S. Critical Mineral Hub and Spoke Model
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Blue Moon Metals Inc.
- Ticker
- MOON.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Oregon
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Zinc, Silver, Cobalt
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-23 11:37:10 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Blue Moon Metals Inc. has acquired the Turner Copper-Gold VMS deposit in Oregon, integrating it into its Western U.S. critical mineral hub and spoke model. The acquisition includes a historical NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate from 2010, featuring indicated and inferred categories with copper, gold, zinc, silver, and cobalt grades, which the company plans to verify. Blue Moon intends to aggressively explore and develop Turner, initiating permitting for exploration drilling and underground development, and conducting further metallurgical and transportation studies to support a future PEA incorporating its Springer complex.
Reasoning: Blue Moon Metals Inc. has acquired the Turner Copper-Gold VMS deposit, which includes a historical resource estimate and historical high-grade drill results, aligning with the company's critical mineral strategy and hub-and-spoke model. While the resource and drill data are historical and require verification, the acquisition provides significant exploration potential and a strategic asset.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of a new VMS deposit with polymetallic potential (copper, gold, zinc, silver, cobalt)
- Strategic fit with the company's Western U.S. critical mineral hub and spoke model
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate provides a strong starting point for future work
- Historical high-grade drill intercepts indicate significant mineralization potential
- Existing rail infrastructure mentioned for potential transport
- Historical metallurgical studies indicate amenability to conventional flotation
Negative factors
- Resource estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification and further work by the company
- Acquisition involves significant share issuance, leading to potential dilution
- Permitting for exploration drilling and underground development at Turner is expected to take 12-18 months
- Transportation studies are required to demonstrate viability of moving material to the Springer complex
- No metallurgical studies have been completed for cobalt, despite its presence in the resource
- Historical drill results do not include true thickness information
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 60
Classification and evidence
Acquisitionpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Blue Moon Metals Inc. has signed a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of the Turner Copper-Gold deposit.
Evidence · text
“Blue Moon Acquires the Turner Copper-Gold VMS Deposit”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The mineral resource estimate is explicitly stated as a historical MRE and the company is not treating it as current.
Evidence · text
“The Company intends to disclose the mineral resource estimate ("MRE"), both Indicated and Inferred categories, as a historical MRE for Turner within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") adopted by the CIM Council on May 19, 2014. It should be noted that the non-Independent Qualified Person for the Company has not done sufficient work to verify and validate the historical MRE, meaning the Company is not treating the historical MRE as current.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Note 3 for the drill results table explicitly states that no apparent true thickness was determined for intercepts.
Evidence · text
“No apparent true thickness was determined for intercepts, given the early-stage nature of the exploration project.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The historical 2010 PEA, which included the resource estimate, was prepared by named P.E. and R.P.G. professionals.
Evidence · text
“historical PEA completed to NI 43-101 standards titled "Turner Gold Resource and Preliminary Economic Assessment" (prepared by: J.M. Marek, P.E.; B.W. Buck, R.P.G; M.D. Strickler, P.E.; S. Annavarapu, P.E.; and J.J. Moore, P.E.)”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The historical PEA and resource estimate were completed to NI 43-101 standards.
Evidence · text
“historical PEA completed to NI 43-101 standards titled "Turner Gold Resource and Preliminary Economic Assessment"”
Maiden Resourceneutral
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: The historical resource estimate was the first formal estimate for the Turner project.
Evidence · text
“The historical, 2010 NI 43-101 MRE on the project is outlined below in Table 1.”
Critical Mineralspositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company explicitly states its focus on critical minerals and mentions cobalt and zinc as critical.
Evidence · text
“to Further Advance its Western U.S. Critical Mineral Hub and Spoke Model”
Dilutionnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The acquisition consideration includes the issuance of 4,778,761 common shares.
Evidence · text
“The issuance by Blue Moon to Gold Coast of 4,778,761 common shares of Blue Moon's issued and outstanding common shares worth ~US$27 million”
Permitting Risknegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company plans to initiate permitting for exploration drilling and underground development, which is expected to take 12 to 18 months.
Evidence · text
“Blue Moon will initiate permitting for exploration drilling and underground development at Turner, which is expected to take 12 to 18 months.”
Transportation Studies Requirednegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The document states that transportation studies are required to demonstrate viability of moving extracted material by rail.
Evidence · text
“transportation studies are required to demonstrate viability.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The historical resource estimate explicitly states the cut-off NSR value and the basis for its calculation.
Evidence · text
“The historical Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) was reported above a cut-off NSR value of US$52/t for Mineral Resources in the underground environment (2010) based on estimated metallurgical recoveries, assumed metal prices, and smelter terms”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: Cobalt is not included in the CuEq calculation due to a lack of metallurgy studies for it at Turner.
Evidence · text
“Cobalt is not included in the CuEq calculation since it has not been part of any metallurgy studies at Turner.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 59. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (54)
TJM-82Turner · copperGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.47672 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-82
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19.47672 m
- From
- 280.74168 m
- To
- 299.008 m
- Intercept Depth
- 280.74168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-82:280.74168-299.008
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2011-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept is very strong with high copper grade and exceptional copper equivalent over a good length, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, though it lacks true thickness and QA/QC details.
Positive factors
- Historical intercept shows high copper grade and very strong metal equivalent
- Indicates significant mineralization over a good length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- No true thickness determined
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 63.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAB-60Turner · copperGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.92096 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.92096 m
- From
- 243.96192 m
- To
- 266.88528 m
- Intercept Depth
- 243.96192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60:243.96192-266.88528
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-10-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows exceptional copper grade and very strong copper equivalent over a good length, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, though it lacks true thickness and QA/QC details.
Positive factors
- Historical intercept shows exceptional copper grade and very strong metal equivalent over a good length
- Indicates significant mineralization
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- No true thickness determined
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.96”
Context: 75.20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAB-13 ¹Turner · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-13 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 290 m
- To
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 290 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-13 ¹:290-330
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: TAB-13 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-13 ¹Turner · goldGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-13 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 290 m
- To
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 290 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-13 ¹:290-330
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.43 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 97.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.43”
Context: TAB-13 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-13 ¹Turner · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-13 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 290 m
- To
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 290 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-13 ¹:290-330
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: TAB-13 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-13 ¹Turner · silverGrade: 19.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-13 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 290 m
- To
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 290 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-13 ¹:290-330
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.55 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 782.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.55”
Context: TAB-13 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-23 ¹Turner · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-23 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 425 m
- To
- 445 m
- Intercept Depth
- 425 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-23 ¹:425-445
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: TAB-23 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-23 ¹Turner · goldGrade: 4.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-23 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 425 m
- To
- 445 m
- Intercept Depth
- 425 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-23 ¹:425-445
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.45 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 89.0 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.45”
Context: TAB-23 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-23 ¹Turner · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-23 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 425 m
- To
- 445 m
- Intercept Depth
- 425 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-23 ¹:425-445
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: TAB-23 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-23 ¹Turner · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-23 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 425 m
- To
- 445 m
- Intercept Depth
- 425 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-23 ¹:425-445
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: TAB-23 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69 ¹Turner · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 158.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 158.8 m
- From
- 256.2 m
- To
- 415 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69 ¹:256.2-415
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % copper is weak against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 25.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: TJM-69 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69 ¹Turner · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 158.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 158.8 m
- From
- 256.2 m
- To
- 415 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69 ¹:256.2-415
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 285.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.80”
Context: TJM-69 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69 ¹Turner · zincGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 158.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 158.8 m
- From
- 256.2 m
- To
- 415 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69 ¹:256.2-415
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.92 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 463.7 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.92 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.92”
Context: TJM-69 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69 ¹Turner · silverGrade: 22.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 158.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69 ¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 158.8 m
- From
- 256.2 m
- To
- 415 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69 ¹:256.2-415
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3604.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 22.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.70”
Context: TJM-69 ¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69¹Turner · copperGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 625 m
- To
- 665 m
- Intercept Depth
- 625 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69¹:625-665
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 % copper is weak against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 29.6 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: TJM-69¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69¹Turner · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 625 m
- To
- 665 m
- Intercept Depth
- 625 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69¹:625-665
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 148.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.7 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.70”
Context: TJM-69¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69¹Turner · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 625 m
- To
- 665 m
- Intercept Depth
- 625 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69¹:625-665
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: TJM-69¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-69¹Turner · silverGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-69¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 625 m
- To
- 665 m
- Intercept Depth
- 625 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-69¹:625-665
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 144.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: TJM-69¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-82¹Turner · copperGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 63.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-82¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 63.9 m
- From
- 921.1 m
- To
- 985 m
- Intercept Depth
- 921.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-82¹:921.1-985
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.16 % copper is moderate against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 74.1 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: TJM-82¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-82¹Turner · goldGrade: 4.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-82¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63.9 m
- From
- 921.1 m
- To
- 985 m
- Intercept Depth
- 921.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-82¹:921.1-985
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.85 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 309.9 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.85 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.85”
Context: TJM-82¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-82¹Turner · zincGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 63.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-82¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 63.9 m
- From
- 921.1 m
- To
- 985 m
- Intercept Depth
- 921.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-82¹:921.1-985
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.31 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 147.6 %·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.31 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.31”
Context: TJM-82¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-82¹Turner · silverGrade: 7.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-82¹
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63.9 m
- From
- 921.1 m
- To
- 985 m
- Intercept Depth
- 921.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-82¹:921.1-985
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.72 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 493.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.72”
Context: TJM-82¹
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-73 ²Turner · copperGrade: 4.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-73 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-73 ²:246-255
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.12 % copper is exceptional against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 37.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.12 % copper is exceptional on the vms deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.12”
Context: TJM-73 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-73 ²Turner · goldGrade: 8.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-73 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-73 ²:246-255
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.62 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 77.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.62 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.62”
Context: TJM-73 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-73 ²Turner · zincGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-73 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-73 ²:246-255
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.45 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: TJM-73 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-73 ²Turner · silverGrade: 29.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-73 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-73 ²:246-255
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.58 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 266.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.58”
Context: TJM-73 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80 m
- From
- 450 m
- To
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:450-530
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 72.0 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80 m
- From
- 450 m
- To
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:450-530
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 320.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · zincGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80 m
- From
- 450 m
- To
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:450-530
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.84 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 147.2 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.84 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.84”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · silverGrade: 8.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80 m
- From
- 450 m
- To
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:450-530
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.18 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 654.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.18”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · copperGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 775 m
- To
- 835 m
- Intercept Depth
- 775 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:775-835
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % copper is moderate against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 52.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · goldGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 775 m
- To
- 835 m
- Intercept Depth
- 775 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:775-835
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.76 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 105.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.76 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.76”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · zincGrade: 11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 775 m
- To
- 835 m
- Intercept Depth
- 775 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:775-835
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 660.0 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.00”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · silverGrade: 54.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 775 m
- To
- 835 m
- Intercept Depth
- 775 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:775-835
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 54.29 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3257.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 54.29 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“54.29”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · copperGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 33.8 m
- From
- 879.6 m
- To
- 813.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:879.6-813.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.05 % copper is strong against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 69.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.05 % copper is strong on the vms deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · goldGrade: 8.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.8 m
- From
- 879.6 m
- To
- 813.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:879.6-813.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.69 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 293.7 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 8.69 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.69”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · zincGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 33.8 m
- From
- 879.6 m
- To
- 813.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:879.6-813.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.19 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 40.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-74 ²Turner · silverGrade: 8.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-74 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.8 m
- From
- 879.6 m
- To
- 813.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-74 ²:879.6-813.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.59 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 290.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.59”
Context: TJM-74 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-75 ²Turner · copperGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-75 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36.7 m
- From
- 983.3 m
- To
- 1020 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-75 ²:983.3-1020
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 % copper is moderate against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 32.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: TJM-75 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-75 ²Turner · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-75 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36.7 m
- From
- 983.3 m
- To
- 1020 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-75 ²:983.3-1020
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.24 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 82.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: TJM-75 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-75 ²Turner · zincGrade: 23.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-75 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36.7 m
- From
- 983.3 m
- To
- 1020 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-75 ²:983.3-1020
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.01 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 844.5 %·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 23.01 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.01”
Context: TJM-75 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TJM-75 ²Turner · silverGrade: 163.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TJM-75 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 163.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36.7 m
- From
- 983.3 m
- To
- 1020 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TJM-75 ²:983.3-1020
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 163.55 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6002.3 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 163.55 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“163.55”
Context: TJM-75 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 315 m
- To
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 315 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:315-340
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is moderate against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 23.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 315 m
- To
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 315 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:315-340
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · zincGrade: 11.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 315 m
- To
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 315 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:315-340
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.31 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 282.8 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.31 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.31”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · silverGrade: 77.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 77.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 315 m
- To
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 315 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:315-340
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 77.14 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1928.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“77.14”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · copperGrade: 3.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 370 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:360-370
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.78 % copper is exceptional against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 37.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.78 % copper is exceptional on the vms deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.78”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · goldGrade: 9.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 370 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:360-370
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.11 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 91.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.11 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.11”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · zincGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 370 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:360-370
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.31 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · silverGrade: 10.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 370 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:360-370
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 108.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.89”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · copperGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 75.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 75.2 m
- From
- 800.4 m
- To
- 875.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 800.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:800.4-875.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.96 % copper is strong against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 147.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.96 % copper is strong on the vms deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.96”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · goldGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 75.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 75.2 m
- From
- 800.4 m
- To
- 875.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 800.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:800.4-875.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 240.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.20”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · zincGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 75.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 75.2 m
- From
- 800.4 m
- To
- 875.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 800.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:800.4-875.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.88 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 291.8 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.88 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.88”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAB-60 ²Turner · silverGrade: 8.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 75.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAB-60 ²
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 75.2 m
- From
- 800.4 m
- To
- 875.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 800.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAB-60 ²:800.4-875.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.71 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 655.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.71”
Context: TAB-60 ²
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (5)
inferredTurner · copperTonnes: 2084000Grade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- Oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Marek, B.W. Buck, M.D. Strickler, S. Annavarapu, J.J. Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:3ac8d7408c4ccfc77f0f
- Deposit or zone
- Turner
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2084000
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 52
- Cutoff Unit
- US$/t NSR
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-05-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-05-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical inferred copper resource provides a potential target for future exploration, but its historical nature and lower confidence category mean it requires significant verification.
Positive factors
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant estimate provides a baseline
- QP believes it is reliable for informing exploration targeting
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification
- Non-Independent QP has not verified it as current
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Cut-off grade based on 2010 metal prices
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 2.084
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.4 years before this release
inferredTurner · goldTonnes: 2084000Grade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- Oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Marek, B.W. Buck, M.D. Strickler, S. Annavarapu, J.J. Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:3ac8d7408c4ccfc77f0f
- Deposit or zone
- Turner
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2084000
- Grade
- 2.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 52
- Cutoff Unit
- US$/t NSR
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-05-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-05-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical inferred gold resource provides a potential target for future exploration, but its historical nature and lower confidence category mean it requires significant verification.
Positive factors
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant estimate provides a baseline
- QP believes it is reliable for informing exploration targeting
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification
- Non-Independent QP has not verified it as current
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Cut-off grade based on 2010 metal prices
Evidence · table
“2.73”
Context: 2.084
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.4 years before this release
inferredTurner · zincTonnes: 2084000Grade: 2.78Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- Oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Marek, B.W. Buck, M.D. Strickler, S. Annavarapu, J.J. Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:3ac8d7408c4ccfc77f0f
- Deposit or zone
- Turner
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2084000
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 52
- Cutoff Unit
- US$/t NSR
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-05-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-05-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical inferred zinc resource provides a potential target for future exploration, but its historical nature and lower confidence category mean it requires significant verification.
Positive factors
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant estimate provides a baseline
- QP believes it is reliable for informing exploration targeting
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification
- Non-Independent QP has not verified it as current
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Cut-off grade based on 2010 metal prices
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: 2.084
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.4 years before this release
inferredTurner · silverTonnes: 2084000Grade: 19.91Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- Oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Marek, B.W. Buck, M.D. Strickler, S. Annavarapu, J.J. Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:3ac8d7408c4ccfc77f0f
- Deposit or zone
- Turner
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2084000
- Grade
- 19.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 52
- Cutoff Unit
- US$/t NSR
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-05-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-05-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical inferred silver resource provides a potential target for future exploration, but its historical nature and lower confidence category mean it requires significant verification.
Positive factors
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant estimate provides a baseline
- QP believes it is reliable for informing exploration targeting
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification
- Non-Independent QP has not verified it as current
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Cut-off grade based on 2010 metal prices
Evidence · table
“19.91”
Context: 2.084
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.4 years before this release
inferredTurner · cobaltTonnes: 2084000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Turner
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- oregon
- Reported Region
- Oregon
- Ticker
- MOON.V
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Marek, B.W. Buck, M.D. Strickler, S. Annavarapu, J.J. Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:3ac8d7408c4ccfc77f0f
- Deposit or zone
- Turner
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2084000
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 52
- Cutoff Unit
- US$/t NSR
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-05-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-05-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical inferred cobalt resource provides a potential target for future exploration, highlighting critical mineral potential, but its age, lack of current verification, and absence of metallurgical studies for cobalt reduce its immediate utility.
Positive factors
- Historical NI 43-101 compliant estimate provides a baseline
- QP believes it is reliable for informing exploration targeting
- Cobalt is a critical mineral
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical and not current, requiring verification
- Non-Independent QP has not verified it as current
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Cut-off grade based on 2010 metal prices
- Cobalt not included in CuEq calculation due to lack of metallurgy studies
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 2.084
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.4 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.