Bitterroot Resources Updates the LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Bitterroot Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- BTT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Primary commodity
- Nickel
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Gold, Platinum, Palladium
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 03:03:14 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bitterroot Resources has provided an update on its winter drilling program at the LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project in Michigan. The program intersected nickel-copper-PGM mineralization in 10 of 26 holes, with notable high-grade semi-massive and massive sulphide intercepts. These results suggest a dynamic magma conduit environment, similar to the nearby Eagle and Eagle East orebodies.
Reasoning: The winter drilling program at the LM Project intersected significant nickel and copper grades, including several high-grade semi-massive and massive sulphide zones, which are indicative of a prospective magmatic Ni-Cu-PGM system with geological similarities to known orebodies in the region.
Positive factors
- High-grade nickel and copper intercepts in semi-massive and massive sulphides
- Evidence of a dynamic magma conduit environment, similar to nearby significant deposits
- Qualified Person sign-off on technical content
Negative factors
- High-grade intercepts are relatively narrow
- True widths of intercepts are not disclosed
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 53
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 53. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (53)
LM 20-01LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate nickel grade over a moderate width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 5.30
LM 20-01LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a moderate width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 5.30
LM 20-01LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade over a moderate width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 5.30
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak nickel grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 2.93
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 2.93
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.93 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 2.93
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273.0-273.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional nickel grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Exceptional nickel grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: 0.75
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273.0-273.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 0.75
LM 21-07LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273.0-273.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold equivalent grade in semi-massive sulphides, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 0.75
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak nickel grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 2.25
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 2.25
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 2.25
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong nickel grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Strong nickel grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“2.74”
Context: 0.19
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 0.19
LM 21-10LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.19
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak nickel grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 2.68
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.68
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold equivalent grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.68
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong nickel grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Strong nickel grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: 0.39
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 0.39
LM 21-13LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold equivalent grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 0.39
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong nickel grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Strong nickel grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“1.96”
Context: 0.27
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low copper grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.27
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low gold equivalent grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.27
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional nickel grade in massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Exceptional nickel grade
- Massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“4.81”
Context: 0.80
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade in massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 0.80
LM 21-14LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade in massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 0.80
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate nickel grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 2.59
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 2.59
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 2.59
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong nickel grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Strong nickel grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: 0.51
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade in semi-massive sulphides, indicating high-grade mineralization, though over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“3.68”
Context: 0.51
LM 22-22LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold equivalent grade in semi-massive sulphides over a very narrow interval.
Positive factors
- Semi-massive sulphide mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Very narrow intercept
- Combined Au+PGM grade
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 0.51
LM 22-23LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-23
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 258.32 m
- To
- 260.36 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-23:258.32-260.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low nickel grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 2.04
LM 22-23LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-23
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 258.32 m
- To
- 260.36 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-23:258.32-260.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low copper grade over a narrow width in disseminated mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 2.04
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 5.16 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.18 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.74 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 2.74 % nickel is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.74”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.81 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 1.81 % nickel is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.81 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 4.81 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.81”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 % nickel is moderate against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.68 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.68 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.68”
Context: and
LM 22-24LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-24
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.38 m
- From
- 240.4 m
- To
- 245.78 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-24:240.4-245.78
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.28 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: LM 22-24
LM 22-24LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-24
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.38 m
- From
- 240.4 m
- To
- 245.78 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-24:240.4-245.78
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: LM 22-24
LM 22-25LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 163.2 m
- To
- 165.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:163.2-165.15
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: LM 22-25
LM 22-25LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 163.2 m
- To
- 165.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:163.2-165.15
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: LM 22-25
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · nickelGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andLM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.