Bayhorse Silver Underground Drilling Operations Update

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Bayhorse Silver Inc.
Ticker
BHS
Exchange
TSX
Region
Oregon, USA
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Copper, Zinc, Lead, Antimony
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-08-21 02:22:14 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bayhorse Silver has completed preparations for a 2,000m underground diamond drilling program at the Bayhorse Silver Mine, set to begin June 1. The program targets new IP anomalies (CR-2, CR-1, and CR-3) to extend the known silver mineralization.

Reasoning: The announcement outlines the commencement of a 2,000m underground drilling program targeting new IP anomalies, supported by high-grade historical intercepts in the area.

Positive factors

  • upcoming drilling program
  • high-grade historical intercepts
  • IP anomaly targets identified

Negative factors

  • drilling has not yet commenced

Facts used in scoring: 3

Atlas analysis — Bayhorse Silver Inc.: Bayhorse Silver Underground Drilling Operations Update. 1104 g/t over 1.5 m

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person (Mark Abrams, AIPG) has prepared and approved the technical content.

Evidence · text

“Mark Abrams, AIPG, a Qualified Person and Director of the Company has prepared, supervised the preparation of, or approved the technical content”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling is intended to confirm presence and extend the mineralized zone near existing resources.

Evidence · text

“intended to confirm the presence of high grade silver bearing "tetrahedrite"”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

DD2024-01Bayhorse Silver Mine · silverIntercept: 213 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD2024-01
Project
Bayhorse Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
BHS

Geometry

Intercept
213 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical intercept showing significant brecciation.

Positive factors

  • strong brecciation

Evidence · text

“DD2024-01, that intersected 213 m (700 ft) of strong brecciation”
MW2Bayhorse Silver Mine · silverGrade: 1104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MW2
Project
Bayhorse Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
BHS

Geometry

Grade
1104
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22 m
To
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade silver intercept from a groundwater test well.

Positive factors

  • high grade

Evidence · text

“1.5 m (5 ft) grading an average of 1,104 g/t (35.46 opt) silver”
MW2Bayhorse Silver Mine · silverGrade: 770Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MW2
Project
Bayhorse Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
BHS

Geometry

Grade
770
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22 m
To
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Second part of the silver intercept from MW2.

Positive factors

  • strong grade

Evidence · text

“1.5 m (5 ft) averaging 770 g/t (23.12 opt) silver”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.