Aztec Drills 83.8 meters of 1.31 g/t AuEq (0.90 g/t Au and 22.61 g/t Ag), Including 7.6 meters of 8.34 g/t AuEq (6.97 g/t Au & 75.42 g/t Ag); Extends the Strike Length by 255 Meters to over 1,250 Meters of Oxide Gold-Silver Mineralization at the Tombstone Project, Arizona
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Aztec Minerals Corp.
- Ticker
- AZT.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Arizona
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-02 11:44:50 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Aztec Minerals announced drill results from its Tombstone Project in Arizona, extending the Contention mineralized system by 255 meters to over 1,250 meters of strike length. Key intercepts include 83.8 meters at 1.31 g/t AuEq (0.90 g/t Au and 22.61 g/t Ag), including 7.6 meters at 8.34 g/t AuEq (6.97 g/t Au & 75.42 g/t Ag) in hole TR26-41. All five reported holes, including four first-pass step-outs, intersected oxide gold-silver mineralization, with the system remaining open to the north and sides.
Reasoning: The drill results demonstrate significant high-grade gold-silver intercepts, particularly in TR26-41 and TR26-43, which substantially extend the known strike length of the Contention system by 255 meters to over 1,250 meters. The success of first-pass step-out drilling and the open nature of the mineralization indicate strong potential for further expansion and positive impact on the upcoming maiden resource estimate.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold-silver intercepts
- Significant strike length extension (255m to over 1,250m)
- All five reported holes intersected mineralization, including four first-pass step-outs
- Mineralization remains open to the north and sides
- Results to be included in upcoming maiden resource estimate
- Good QA/QC disclosure with certified labs and QP sign-off
Negative factors
- True width not reported, only apparent width
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 95
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Hole TR26-41 returned 7.6 m averaging 6.97 g/t Au and 75.42 g/t Ag (8.34 g/t AuEq), which is exceptionally high-grade for gold and silver.
Evidence · text
“TR26-41 returned 83.8 m averaging 0.90 g/t Au and 22.61 g/t Ag (1.31 g/t AuEq) from 24.4 m, including 7.6 m averaging 6.97 g/t Au and 75.42 g/t Ag (8.34 g/t AuEq) from 42.7 m”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Four of the five reported holes are first-pass step-outs that extend the Contention mineralized system 255 meters to the north-northeast.
Evidence · text
“Five holes reported - four first-pass step-outs, all mineralized - extend the Contention mineralized system 255 meters to the north-northeast in the North Extension target”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions samples are analyzed by two certified labs (Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs), includes certified blanks, standards, and duplicates, and has QP sign-off by Allen David Heyl.
Evidence · text
“The samples are analyzed by two certified labs, Bureau Veritas for gold... or by Skyline Labs for gold... The Company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates. The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, B.Sc., CPG - AIPG No.11277, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: Composited intervals are reported at a 0.10 g/t AuEq cutoff with a maximum of three consecutive below-cutoff samples of internal dilution and a minimum of two samples.
Evidence · text
“Composited intervals are reported at a 0.10 g/t AuEq cutoff with a maximum of three consecutive below-cutoff samples of internal dilution and a minimum of two samples”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths.
Evidence · text
“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths, which can range at the property from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 95. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (95)
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83.8 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 108.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept represents a strong gold grade over a substantial width, contributing significantly to the overall strike extension and indicating robust mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over significant width
- High AuEq grade
- Part of a significant strike extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 83.8
TR26-41Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 22.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83.8 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 108.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-41:24.4-108.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good silver grade over a substantial width, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade over significant width
- High AuEq grade
- Part of a significant strike extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“TR26-41 returned 83.8 m averaging 0.90 g/t Au and 22.61 g/t Ag (1.31 g/t AuEq) from 24.4 m”
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 6.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade gold intercept significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of the zone, demonstrating high-grade potential within the broader mineralized envelope.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept
- Very high AuEq grade
- Confirms high-grade potential within broader zone
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“6.97”
Context: 7.6
TR26-41Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 75.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-41:42.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very high-grade silver intercept, combined with gold, significantly boosts the overall value of the sub-interval and the project.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade silver intercept
- Very high AuEq grade
- Confirms high-grade potential within broader zone
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“including 7.6 m averaging 6.97 g/t Au and 75.42 g/t Ag (8.34 g/t AuEq) from 42.7 m”
TR26-43Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept demonstrates good gold mineralization over a substantial width, significantly extending the known zone to the north and indicating strong exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over significant width
- High AuEq grade
- Extends mineralization 90m further north, leaving it open
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 51.8
TR26-43Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 25.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-43:85.3-137.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good silver mineralization over a substantial width, contributing to the polymetallic nature and northern extension of the zone.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade over significant width
- High AuEq grade
- Extends mineralization 90m further north, leaving it open
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“TR26-43, the most northerly hole for which assay results have been reported to date, returned 51.8 m averaging 0.70 g/t Au and 25.59 g/t Ag (1.16 g/t AuEq) from 85.3 m”
TR26-43Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 109.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade gold sub-interval within TR26-43 confirms the presence of significant mineralization in the northern extension, enhancing the overall prospectivity.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over good width
- High AuEq grade
- Confirms high-grade potential in northern extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: 19.8
TR26-43Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 58.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 109.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-43:109.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade silver sub-interval within TR26-43 further supports the strong polymetallic nature of the mineralization in the northern extension.
Positive factors
- High silver grade over good width
- High AuEq grade
- Confirms high-grade potential in northern extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“including 19.8 m averaging 1.93 g/t Au and 58.01 g/t Ag (2.99 g/t AuEq)”
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 10.7 m
- To
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-44:10.7-33.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at the southern end of the newly extended zone, contributing to the overall continuity of the system.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over moderate width
- Good AuEq grade
- Demonstrates mineralization at southern end of new extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: 22.9
TR26-44Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 10.7 m
- To
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-44:10.7-33.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver mineralization at the southern end of the new extension, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over moderate width
- Good AuEq grade
- Demonstrates mineralization at southern end of new extension
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“TR26-44 returned 22.9 m averaging 0.79 g/t Au and 8.25 g/t Ag (0.94 g/t AuEq) from 10.7 m”
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This deeper intercept in TR26-44 shows good gold mineralization over a significant width, indicating continuity at depth in the southern part of the extension.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over significant width
- Good AuEq grade
- Demonstrates deeper mineralization at southern end
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 51.8
TR26-44Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-44:77.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This deeper intercept in TR26-44 shows moderate silver mineralization over a significant width, contributing to the polymetallic nature at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over significant width
- Good AuEq grade
- Demonstrates deeper mineralization at southern end
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“deeper 51.8 m averaging 0.55 g/t Au and 5.61 g/t Ag (0.65 g/t AuEq) from 77.7 m”
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 59.4 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while lower grade, is important for demonstrating continuity of mineralization over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Significant width
- Confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Lower grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 59.4
TR26-40Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 59.4 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-40:33.5-93.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, with moderate silver grades, helps confirm the continuity of polymetallic mineralization between other holes.
Positive factors
- Confirms continuity of mineralization along the zone
- Moderate AuEq grade over significant width
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“TR26-40, collared between TR26-39 and TR26-41, demonstrated continuity of mineralization along the zone, and TR26-42 tested the eastern side of the zone with intercepts including 39.6m averaging 0.16 g/t Au and 9.66 g/t Ag (0.34 g/t AuEq).”
TR26-42Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while lower grade, is important for defining the eastern extent of the mineralized system, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit geometry.
Positive factors
- Helps extend the eastern margin of mineralization
- Moderate AuEq grade over good width
Negative factors
- Lower gold grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 39.6
TR26-42Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 9.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-42:33.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, with moderate silver grades, helps define the eastern extent of the polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Helps extend the eastern margin of mineralization
- Moderate AuEq grade over good width
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“TR26-40, collared between TR26-39 and TR26-41, demonstrated continuity of mineralization along the zone, and TR26-42 tested the eastern side of the zone with intercepts including 39.6m averaging 0.16 g/t Au and 9.66 g/t Ag (0.34 g/t AuEq).”
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-40:0-7.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept, while low grade, indicates the presence of mineralization from surface.
Positive factors
- Near-surface mineralization
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 7.6
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade, narrow intercept, indicating minor mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 4.6
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good gold grade, indicating higher-grade pockets within the broader zone.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Good AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 4.6
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate AuEq grade, primarily driven by silver, within the broader zone.
Positive factors
- Moderate AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 4.6
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good AuEq grade, indicating a higher-grade pocket within the broader zone.
Positive factors
- Good AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 3.0
TR26-40Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate AuEq grade, primarily driven by silver, within the broader zone.
Positive factors
- Moderate AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 3.0
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-41:0-4.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept indicates mineralization from surface, which is positive for potential open-pit mining.
Positive factors
- Near-surface mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 4.6
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface sub-interval shows moderate AuEq grade, indicating mineralization from surface.
Positive factors
- Near-surface mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 3.0
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows good gold and AuEq grades, contributing to the overall high-grade nature of the intercept.
Positive factors
- Good AuEq grade
- Good gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 9.1
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 2.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.84
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high gold grade, further confirming the presence of significant mineralization within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- High AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“2.87”
Context: 3.0
TR26-41Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high AuEq grade, primarily driven by silver, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- High AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 3.0
TR26-42Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-42:13.7-16.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade, narrow intercept, indicating minor mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 3.0
TR26-42Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good gold grade and high AuEq grade, indicating a higher-grade pocket within the eastern margin.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- High AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 3.0
TR26-42Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, indicating minor mineralization at depth.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 9.1
TR26-43Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-43:0-18.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept, while low grade, indicates the presence of mineralization from surface in the northernmost hole.
Positive factors
- Near-surface mineralization
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 18.3
TR26-43Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 161.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade, narrow intercept, indicating minor mineralization at depth.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 3.0
TR26-43Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 193.5 m
- To
- 202.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This deeper intercept shows moderate AuEq grade, indicating mineralization at greater depths in the northern extension.
Positive factors
- Moderate AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 9.1
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade gold sub-interval confirms the presence of significant mineralization within the southern extension.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- High AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“3.91”
Context: 3.0
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, indicating minor mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 6.1
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate AuEq grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 12.2
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good gold grade, indicating a higher-grade pocket within the broader zone.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Good AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: 3.0
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade gold sub-interval confirms the presence of significant mineralization at depth within the southern extension.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- High AuEq grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: 6.1
TR26-44Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-44
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 157 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas, Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, indicating minor mineralization at depth.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 19.8
TR26-40Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 4.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-40
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-40:0-7.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.54”
Context: TR26-40
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:15.2-19.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:15.2-19.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 59.4 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:33.5-93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 59.4 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:33.5-93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.38 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 735.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.38”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-59.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 18.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-59.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.73”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:61-65.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 26.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:61-65.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 120.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.23”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:67.1-70.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 34.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:67.1-70.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.35 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 103.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.35”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 24.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.50”
Context: Including
TR26-41Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-41
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-41:0-4.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 55.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.13”
Context: TR26-41
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 15.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.85”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83.8 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 108.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:24.4-108.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 75.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 22.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83.8 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 108.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:24.4-108.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.61 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1894.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.61”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 6.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.97 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 53.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.97 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.97”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 75.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75.42 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 573.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“75.42”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 51.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.72 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 470.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.72”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 2.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.6-74.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.87 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.87 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.87”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 53.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.6-74.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 159.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“53.20”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:82.3-85.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 78.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 78.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:82.3-85.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78.15 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 234.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“78.15”
Context: Including
TR26-42Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-42
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-42:13.7-16.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: TR26-42
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:33.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 9.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:33.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.66 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 382.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.66”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.1-38.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 43.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.1-38.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.65 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 130.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“43.65”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:120.4-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:120.4-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: and
TR26-43Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR26-43
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR26-43:0-18.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.82 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.82”
Context: TR26-43
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:85.3-137.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 25.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:85.3-137.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.59 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1325.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.59”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 109.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:109.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 38.2 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 58.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 109.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:109.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.01 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1148.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“58.01”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 161.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:158.5-161.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 161.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:158.5-161.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.80”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 193.5 m
- To
- 202.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:193.5-202.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 193.5 m
- To
- 202.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:193.5-202.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.30”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.3-21.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.91 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.91 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.91”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.3-21.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.65”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39.6-45.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39.6-45.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.03”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:54.9-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 7.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:54.9-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.93 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 96.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.93 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.93”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:54.9-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.05”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:77.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.8 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 129.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:77.7-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.61 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 290.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.61”
Context: and
IncludingTombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86.9-93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.6 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: Including
IncludingTombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 93 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86.9-93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.98 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.98 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.98”
Context: Including
andTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 157 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:137.2-157
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: and
andTombstone Project · silverGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Tombstone Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona
- Ticker
- AZT.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 157 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:137.2-157
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.72”
Context: and
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.