# Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/AZT/news/6479283123783857/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-01-15T12:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Aztec Minerals Corp. - Ticker: AZT - Exchange: TSX - Region: Arizona - Primary commodity: Silver - Secondary commodities: Gold - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-08-24 07:31:38 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Aztec Minerals announced new drill results from its Tombstone Project in Arizona, highlighted by 48.6 meters averaging 133.1 gpt AgEq from surface in hole TR25-26. The company also reported an expansion of its 2025-2026 drill program by 3,500 meters, bringing the total to 12,000 meters. These results continue to demonstrate broad continuity of oxidized silver-gold mineralization and expand the target area to depth, east, and west. Reasoning: The drill results confirm and expand the known silver-gold mineralization at the Tombstone Project with several strong intercepts, including a significant near-surface interval. The expansion of the drill program signals company confidence in the project's potential. However, the lack of true width reporting introduces some uncertainty regarding the geometry of the mineralization. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent intercepts, including 48.6m at 133.1 gpt AgEq from surface and sub-intervals up to 212.35 gpt AgEq. - Positive factor: Drill program expanded by 3,500 meters, indicating continued exploration success and confidence. - Positive factor: Results demonstrate broad continuity of oxidized Ag-Au mineralization to depth, east, and west, expanding the target area. - Positive factor: Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off. - Negative factor: All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which can range from 30% to 100% of apparent widths. - Negative factor: While strong, the new headline intercepts do not significantly exceed the project's historical best grades or grade-thickness values. Facts used in scoring: 107 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 107. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (107) ### TR25-18 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-0) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-18 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.245 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 22.8 m - To: 31.9 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-18:22.8-31.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588427 - Northing: 3507861 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 104 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.245 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, even over a narrow interval, and is below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.245 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-18 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-1) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-18 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 48.67 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 22.8 m - To: 31.9 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-18:22.8-31.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588427 - Northing: 3507861 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 104 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 65.81 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 48.67 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 65.81 gpt is also moderate. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 48.67 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-19 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-2) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-19 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.057 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 16.7 m - From: 0 m - To: 16.7 m - Hole Depth: 158.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-19:0-16.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588414 - Northing: 3507712 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.057 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.057 Context: 16.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-19 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-3) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-19 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 7.94 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 16.7 m - From: 0 m - To: 16.7 m - Hole Depth: 158.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-19:0-16.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588414 - Northing: 3507712 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 11.95 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 7.94 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.95 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 7.94 Context: 16.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-4) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-21 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.143 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 7.6 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 91.2 m - Hole Depth: 194.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-21:83.6-91.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588571 - Northing: 3508197 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 230 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.143 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.143 Context: 7.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-5) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-21 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 16.2 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 7.6 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 91.2 m - Hole Depth: 194.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-21:83.6-91.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588571 - Northing: 3508197 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 230 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 26.21 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 16.2 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 26.21 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 16.2 Context: 7.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-6) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-21 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.112 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 25.8 m - From: 100.3 m - To: 126.1 m - Hole Depth: 194.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588571 - Northing: 3508197 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 230 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.112 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.112 Context: 25.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-7) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-21 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 15.73 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 25.8 m - From: 100.3 m - To: 126.1 m - Hole Depth: 194.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588571 - Northing: 3508197 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 230 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 23.53 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 15.73 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 23.53 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 15.73 Context: 25.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-8) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-22 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.083 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 21.3 m - Hole Depth: 152 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-22:16.7-21.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588772 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.083 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.083 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-9) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-22 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 4.43 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 21.3 m - Hole Depth: 152 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-22:16.7-21.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588772 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 10.22 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 4.43 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 10.22 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 4.43 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-10) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-22 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.067 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 60.8 m - To: 69.9 m - Hole Depth: 152 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588772 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.067 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.067 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-11) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-22 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 6.23 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 60.8 m - To: 69.9 m - Hole Depth: 152 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588772 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 10.96 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.23 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 10.96 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 6.23 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-12) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.161 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 16.7 m - From: 0 m - To: 16.7 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-23:0-16.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.161 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.161 Context: 16.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-13) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 7.25 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 16.7 m - From: 0 m - To: 16.7 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-23:0-16.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 18.56 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 7.25 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 18.56 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 7.25 Context: 16.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-14) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.112 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 7.6 m - From: 22.8 m - To: 30.4 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.112 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.112 Context: 7.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-15) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 12.48 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 7.6 m - From: 22.8 m - To: 30.4 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 20.33 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 12.48 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 20.33 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 12.48 Context: 7.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-16) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.03 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 118.6 m - To: 129.2 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.03 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.03 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-17) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-23 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 5.07 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 118.6 m - To: 129.2 m - Hole Depth: 205.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588769 - Northing: 3507516 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 75 ° - Dip: -80 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.15 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.07 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 7.15 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 5.07 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-18) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.236 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 152.4 m - From: 0 m - To: 152.4 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-24:0-152.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.236 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.236 Context: 152.4 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-19) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 19.81 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 152.4 m - From: 0 m - To: 152.4 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-24:0-152.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 36.32 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 19.81 gpt is weak, but the AgEq of 36.32 gpt is moderate, and the very long intercept length \(152.4m\) makes this a strong intercept \(5534.9 GT\). The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 19.81 Context: 152.4 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-20) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1.871 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 3 m - To: 13.6 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.871 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the intercept length is moderate. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 1.871 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-21) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 81.41 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 3 m - To: 13.6 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 212.35 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver equivalent grade of 212.35 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, and the intercept length is moderate. This is a significant sub-interval within a broader zone. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent grade \(212.35 gpt AgEq\) over a moderate interval \(10.6m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(2251 GT\). - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 81.41 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 212.35 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold \(200 gpt\) for silver. Evidence · table > 212.35 Context: 10.6 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-22) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1.197 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 50.1 m - To: 54.7 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.197 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, but the intercept length is narrow. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 1.197 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-23) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-24 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 92.8 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 50.1 m - To: 54.7 m - Hole Depth: 155 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588776 - Northing: 3507517 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 255 ° - Dip: -77 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 176.57 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 92.8 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 176.57 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit. The intercept length is narrow. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 92.8 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-24) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.186 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 0 m - To: 6.1 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-25:0-6.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.186 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.186 Context: 6.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-25) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 11.5 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 0 m - To: 6.1 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-25:0-6.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 25.56 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 11.5 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 25.56 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 11.5 Context: 6.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-26) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.042 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 36.5 m - To: 48.7 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.042 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.042 Context: 12.2 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-27) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 5.39 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 36.5 m - To: 48.7 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.32 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.39 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 8.32 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 5.39 Context: 12.2 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-28) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.106 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 48.6 m - From: 111 m - To: 159.6 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.106 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.106 Context: 48.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-29) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 6.79 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 48.6 m - From: 111 m - To: 159.6 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 14.19 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.79 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 14.19 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length \(48.6m\) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 6.79 Context: 48.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-30) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.139 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 31.9 m - From: 171.8 m - To: 203.7 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.139 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.139 Context: 31.9 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-31) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 8.65 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 31.9 m - From: 171.8 m - To: 203.7 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 18.36 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 8.65 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 18.36 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length \(31.9m\) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 8.65 Context: 31.9 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-32) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.192 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.8 m - From: 225 m - To: 247.8 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.192 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.192 Context: 22.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-33) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-25 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 15.15 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.8 m - From: 225 m - To: 247.8 m - Hole Depth: 252.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588671 - Northing: 3508000 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 28.6 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 15.15 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 28.6 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length \(22.8m\) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 15.15 Context: 22.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-34) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-26 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1.06 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 48.6 m - From: 0 m - To: 48.6 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-26:0-48.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588879 - Northing: 3508028 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -55 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.06 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length \(48.6m\) makes this a strong intercept. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 1.06 Context: 48.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-35) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-26 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 58.93 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 48.6 m - From: 0 m - To: 48.6 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-26:0-48.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588879 - Northing: 3508028 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -55 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 133.13 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver equivalent grade of 133.13 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length \(48.6m\) from surface makes this a strong and highly material result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent grade \(133.13 gpt AgEq\) over a significant interval \(48.6m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(6468.66 GT\). - Positive factor: Intercept starts from surface, indicating potential for open-pit mining. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 58.93 Context: 48.6 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 133.13 gpt AgEq over 48.6m results in a GT value of 6468.66, which is above the strong threshold \(3000 g/t·m\) for silver. Evidence · table > 133.13 Context: 48.6 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-36) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-26 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.061 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 130.7 m - To: 141.3 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588879 - Northing: 3508028 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -55 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.061 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.061 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TR25-26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-37) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-26 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 4.06 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 130.7 m - To: 141.3 m - Hole Depth: 182.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588879 - Northing: 3508028 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: -55 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.34 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 4.06 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 8.34 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 4.06 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths ### TC25-01 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-38) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TC25-01 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.9 m - From: 105.1 m - To: 128 m - Hole Depth: 182.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TC25-01:105.1-128 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588540 - Northing: 3507254 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 82 ° - Dip: 65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.18 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 22.9 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TC25-01 Context: 22.9 ### TC25-01 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-39) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TC25-01 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 23 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.9 m - From: 105.1 m - To: 128 m - Hole Depth: 182.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TC25-01:105.1-128 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588540 - Northing: 3507254 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 82 ° - Dip: 65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 39.4 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 23.0 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 39.4 gpt is moderate. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 23.0 Context: 22.9 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TC25-01 Context: 22.9 ### TR25-02a [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-40) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02a - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.24 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 62.5 m - From: 73.1 m - To: 135.6 m - Hole Depth: 158.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-02a:73.1-135.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507513 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.24 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length makes it moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.24 Context: 62.5 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02a Context: 62.5 ### TR25-02a [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-41) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02a - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 19.4 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 62.5 m - From: 73.1 m - To: 135.6 m - Hole Depth: 158.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-02a:73.1-135.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507513 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 65 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 40.7 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 19.4 gpt is weak, but the AgEq of 40.7 gpt is moderate, and the very long intercept length \(62.5m\) makes this a moderately material intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 19.4 Context: 62.5 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02a Context: 62.5 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-42) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 29 m - From: 68.6 m - To: 97.5 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-02:68.6-97.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.19 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 29.0 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 29.0 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-43) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 10.4 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 29 m - From: 68.6 m - To: 97.5 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-02:68.6-97.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 27.6 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 10.4 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 27.6 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 10.4 Context: 29.0 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 29.0 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-44) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.05 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 35.1 m - From: 123.4 m - To: 158.5 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.05 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.05 Context: 35.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 35.1 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-45) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 8.7 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 35.1 m - From: 123.4 m - To: 158.5 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 11.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 8.7 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.8 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 8.7 Context: 35.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 35.1 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-46) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.08 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 182.9 m - To: 192 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.08 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.08 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 9.1 ### TR25-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-47) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-02 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 5.4 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 182.9 m - To: 192 m - Hole Depth: 193.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588722 - Northing: 3507589 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 75 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 12.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.4 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 12.9 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 5.4 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-02 Context: 9.1 ### TR25-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-48) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-03 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.41 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 50.3 m - From: 67 m - To: 117.3 m - Hole Depth: 152.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-03:67-117.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507586 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 50 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.41 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length \(50.3m\) makes this moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.41 Context: 50.3 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-03 Context: 50.3 ### TR25-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-49) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-03 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 53 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 50.3 m - From: 67 m - To: 117.3 m - Hole Depth: 152.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-03:67-117.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507586 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 50 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 89.7 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 53.0 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 89.7 gpt is also moderate, but the very long intercept length \(50.3m\) makes this a strong intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 53.0 Context: 50.3 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-03 Context: 50.3 ### TR25-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-50) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-03 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 2.26 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 88.4 m - To: 94.5 m - Hole Depth: 152.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507586 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 50 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 2.26 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 2.26 Context: 6.1 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The gold grade of 2.26 gpt is above the strong threshold \(2 gpt\) for gold. Evidence · table > 2.26 Context: 6.1 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-03 Context: 6.1 ### TR25-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-51) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-03 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 253 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 88.4 m - To: 94.5 m - Hole Depth: 152.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588721 - Northing: 3507586 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 140 ° - Dip: 50 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 456.6 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 253.0 gpt is strong, and the AgEq of 456.6 gpt is also strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent grade \(456.6 gpt AgEq\) over a narrow interval \(6.1m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(2785.26 GT\). - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 253.0 Context: 6.1 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 456.6 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold \(200 gpt\) for silver. Evidence · table > 456.6 Context: 6.1 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-03 Context: 6.1 ### TR25-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-52) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-04 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.11 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3.04 m - From: 185.4 m - To: 188.5 m - Hole Depth: 201.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-04:185.4-188.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588524 - Northing: 3507933 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.11 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.11 Context: 3.04 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-04 Context: 3.04 ### TR25-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-53) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-04 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 27.05 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3.04 m - From: 185.4 m - To: 188.5 m - Hole Depth: 201.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-04:185.4-188.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588524 - Northing: 3507933 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 37.17 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 27.05 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 37.17 gpt is moderate. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 27.05 Context: 3.04 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-04 Context: 3.04 ### TR25-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-54) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-04 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3.04 m - From: 196.1 m - To: 199.1 m - Hole Depth: 201.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588524 - Northing: 3507933 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.18 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 3.04 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-04 Context: 3.04 ### TR25-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-55) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-04 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 6.15 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3.04 m - From: 196.1 m - To: 199.1 m - Hole Depth: 201.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588524 - Northing: 3507933 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 120 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 22.35 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.15 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 22.35 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 6.15 Context: 3.04 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-04 Context: 3.04 ### TR25-05 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-56) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-05 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.55 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 47.1 m - From: 3.04 m - To: 50.2 m - Hole Depth: 164.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-05:3.04-50.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588826 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.55 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length \(47.1m\) makes this moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.55 Context: 47.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-05 Context: 47.1 ### TR25-05 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-57) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-05 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 36.36 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 47.1 m - From: 3.04 m - To: 50.2 m - Hole Depth: 164.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-05:3.04-50.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588826 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 85.46 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 36.36 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 85.46 gpt is also moderate, but the very long intercept length \(47.1m\) makes this a strong intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 36.36 Context: 47.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-05 Context: 47.1 ### TR25-05 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-58) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-05 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 3.91 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 19.8 m - To: 24.3 m - Hole Depth: 164.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588826 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 3.91 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 3.91 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The gold grade of 3.91 gpt is above the strong threshold \(2 gpt\) for gold. Evidence · table > 3.91 Context: 4.6 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-05 Context: 4.6 ### TR25-05 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-59) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-05 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 238.73 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 19.8 m - To: 24.3 m - Hole Depth: 164.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588826 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 90 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 590.42 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 238.73 gpt is strong, and the AgEq of 590.42 gpt is exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver equivalent grade \(590.42 gpt AgEq\) over a narrow interval \(4.6m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(2715.932 GT\). - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 238.73 Context: 4.6 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 590.42 gpt AgEq is above the exceptional threshold \(500 gpt\) for silver. Evidence · table > 590.42 Context: 4.6 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-05 Context: 4.6 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-60) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.14 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 35 m - To: 44.1 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-06:35-44.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.14 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.14 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 9.1 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-61) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 13.95 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 9.1 m - From: 35 m - To: 44.1 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-06:35-44.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 26.13 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 13.95 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 26.13 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 13.95 Context: 9.1 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 9.1 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-62) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1.99 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 28.9 m - From: 76 m - To: 104.9 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.99 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length \(28.9m\) makes this a moderately material intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 1.99 Context: 28.9 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 28.9 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-63) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 70.83 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 28.9 m - From: 76 m - To: 104.9 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 250.22 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 70.83 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 250.22 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a moderate interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent grade \(250.22 gpt AgEq\) over a moderate interval \(28.9m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(7231.378 GT\). - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 70.83 Context: 28.9 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 250.22 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold \(200 gpt\) for silver. Evidence · table > 250.22 Context: 28.9 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 28.9 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-64) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 17.7 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 86.6 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 17.7 gpt is exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(17.7 gpt\) over a narrow interval. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 17.7 Context: 3.0 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The gold grade of 17.7 gpt is above the exceptional threshold \(5 gpt\) for gold. Evidence · table > 17.7 Context: 3.0 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 3.0 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-65) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 556.5 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 3 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 86.6 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2149.5 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 556.5 gpt is exceptional, and the AgEq of 2149.5 gpt is also exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver equivalent grade \(2149.5 gpt AgEq\) over a narrow interval \(3.0m\), resulting in a strong GT value \(6448.5 GT\). - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 556.5 Context: 3.0 #### Rejected tags **Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 2149.5 gpt AgEq is above the exceptional threshold \(500 gpt\) for silver. Evidence · table > 2149.5 Context: 3.0 **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 3.0 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-66) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.07 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.8 m - From: 112.5 m - To: 135.3 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.07 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.07 Context: 22.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 22.8 ### TR25-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-67) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-06 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 5.06 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 22.8 m - From: 112.5 m - To: 135.3 m - Hole Depth: 170.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588825 - Northing: 3507637 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 0 ° - Dip: 90 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 11.38 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.06 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.38 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 5.06 Context: 22.8 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-06 Context: 22.8 ### TR25-07 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-68) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-07 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.14 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 13.7 m - From: 42.6 m - To: 56.2 m - Hole Depth: 225.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-07:42.6-56.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588647 - Northing: 3507948 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.14 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.14 Context: 13.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-07 Context: 13.7 ### TR25-07 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-69) Tombstone Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-07 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 10.37 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 13.7 m - From: 42.6 m - To: 56.2 m - Hole Depth: 225.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-07:42.6-56.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588647 - Northing: 3507948 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 22.64 - Metal Eq. Unit: gpt AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The silver grade of 10.37 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 22.64 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 10.37 Context: 13.7 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-07 Context: 13.7 ### TR25-07 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-70) Tombstone Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-07 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.15 - Grade Unit: gpt - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 68.4 m - To: 79 m - Hole Depth: 225.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - Easting: 588647 - Northing: 3507948 - CRS: UTM - Azimuth: 105 ° - Dip: 60 ° - Loc. Confidence: high #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Bureau Veritas - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.15 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty. - Negative factor: Apparent width only Evidence · table > 0.15 Context: 10.6 #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths. Evidence · text > All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement. Evidence · table > TR25-07 Context: 10.6 ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-71) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1.871 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 3 m - To: 13.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::3-13.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.871 g/t gold is moderate against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 1.871 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-72) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 81.41 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 3 m - To: 13.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::3-13.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 81.41 g/t silver is weak against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 862.9 g/t·m is weak. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 81.41 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-73) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 2.26 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 88.4 m - To: 94.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::88.4-94.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.26 g/t gold is strong against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.26 g/t gold is strong on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.26 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-74) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 253 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 88.4 m - To: 94.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::88.4-94.5 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 253 g/t silver is strong against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 1543.3 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 253 g/t silver is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 253.0 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-75) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 3.91 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 19.8 m - To: 24.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::19.8-24.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.91 g/t gold is strong against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 3.91 g/t gold is strong on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 3.91 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-76) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 238.73 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 19.8 m - To: 24.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::19.8-24.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 238.73 g/t silver is strong against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 1098.2 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 238.73 g/t silver is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 238.73 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-77) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 17.7 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 86.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::83.6-86.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 53.1 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 17.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 17.7 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-78) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 556.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3 m - From: 83.6 m - To: 86.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::83.6-86.6 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 556.5 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 1669.5 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 556.5 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 556.5 Context: Including: ### TR25-08 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-79) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-08 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.68 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 48.6 m - To: 60.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-08:48.6-60.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.68 Context: TR25-08 ### TR25-08 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-80) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-08 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 94.47 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 48.6 m - To: 60.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-08:48.6-60.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 94.47 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 1152.5 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 94.47 Context: TR25-08 ### TR25-09 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-81) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-09 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.017 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 12.1 m - To: 24.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-09:12.1-24.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold \(0.3 g/t\) on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.017 Context: TR25-09 ### TR25-09 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-82) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-09 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 9.49 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 12.1 m - To: 24.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-09:12.1-24.3 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.49 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 115.8 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 9.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 9.49 Context: TR25-09 ### TR25-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-83) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-10 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.192 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 72.9 m - From: 0 m - To: 72.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-10:0-72.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.192 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.192 Context: TR25-10 ### TR25-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-84) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-10 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 14.92 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 72.9 m - From: 0 m - To: 72.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-10:0-72.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.92 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 1087.7 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 14.92 Context: TR25-10 ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-85) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.485 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 21.3 m - To: 31.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::21.3-31.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.485 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.485 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-86) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 36.71 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 10.6 m - From: 21.3 m - To: 31.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::21.3-31.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.71 g/t silver is weak against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 389.1 g/t·m is weak. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 36.71 Context: Including: ### TR25-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-87) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-11 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.033 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 88.2 m - From: 0 m - To: 88.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-11:0-88.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 g/t gold is below against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 0.033 g/t gold is below the weak threshold \(0.3 g/t\) on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.033 Context: TR25-11 ### TR25-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-88) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-11 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 11.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 88.2 m - From: 0 m - To: 88.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-11:0-88.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 987.8 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 11.2 Context: TR25-11 ### TR25-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-89) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-12 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.041 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 0 m - To: 6.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-12:0-6.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 g/t gold is below against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 0.041 g/t gold is below the weak threshold \(0.3 g/t\) on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.041 Context: TR25-12 ### TR25-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-90) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-12 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 15.1 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.1 m - From: 0 m - To: 6.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-12:0-6.1 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 15.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 15.1 Context: TR25-12 ### TR25-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-91) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-13 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.045 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 155 m - To: 167.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-13:155-167.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 g/t gold is below against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 0.045 g/t gold is below the weak threshold \(0.3 g/t\) on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.045 Context: TR25-13 ### TR25-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-92) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-13 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 11.78 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.2 m - From: 155 m - To: 167.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-13:155-167.2 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.78 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 143.7 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 11.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 11.78 Context: TR25-13 ### TR25-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-93) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-14 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.214 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 86.6 m - From: 21.3 m - To: 109.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-14:21.3-109.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.214 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.214 Context: TR25-14 ### TR25-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-94) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-14 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 23.19 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 86.6 m - From: 21.3 m - To: 109.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-14:21.3-109.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.19 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 2008.3 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 23.19 Context: TR25-14 ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-95) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.811 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.2 m - From: 36.5 m - To: 51.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::36.5-51.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.811 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.811 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-96) Tombstone Project · silver Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 6168 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.2 m - From: 36.5 m - To: 51.7 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::36.5-51.7 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6168 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 93753.6 g/t·m is exceptional. - Positive factor: 6168 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 61,68 Context: Including: ### TR25-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-97) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-15 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.78 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 27.4 m - From: 0 m - To: 27.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-15:0-27.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 g/t gold is weak against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 21.4 g/t·m is weak. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.78 Context: TR25-15 ### TR25-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-98) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-15 - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 12.37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 27.4 m - From: 0 m - To: 27.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-15:0-27.4 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.37 g/t silver is weak against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 338.9 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is below; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 12.37 Context: TR25-15 ### TR25-16\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-99) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-16\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.72 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 50.2 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 66.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-16\*:16.7-66.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is moderate against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 0.72 Context: TR25-16\* ### TR25-16\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-100) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-16\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 50.76 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 50.2 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 66.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-16\*:16.7-66.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.76 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 2548.2 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 50.76 Context: TR25-16\* ### TR25-17A\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-101) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-17A\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 18.2 m - From: 12.2 m - To: 22.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-17A\*:12.2-22.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 1.00 Context: TR25-17A\* ### TR25-17A\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-102) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-17A\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 10.96 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 18.2 m - From: 12.2 m - To: 22.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-17A\*:12.2-22.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.96 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 199.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 10.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 10.96 Context: TR25-17A\* ### TR25-17\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-103) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-17\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 5.16 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 57.8 m - From: 9.1 m - To: 66.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-17\*:9.1-66.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 298.2 g/t·m is strong \(grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 5.16 Context: TR25-17\* ### TR25-17\* [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-104) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: TR25-17\* - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 39.12 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 57.8 m - From: 9.1 m - To: 66.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TR25-17\*:9.1-66.9 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.12 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 2261.1 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 39.12 Context: TR25-17\* ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-105) Tombstone Project · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: gold - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 58.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 21.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::16.7-21.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the open\_pit mining band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 269.1 g/t·m is strong \(grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the open\_pit mining band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 58.5 Context: Including: ### Including: [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/aztec-drills-48-6m-of-133-1-gpt-ageq-from-surface-at-tombstone-project-arizona-a--cb7d6221-f97c-4347-ae5c-9c9d3912b9ca#fact-drill-facts-106) Tombstone Project · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: Including: - Project: Tombstone Project - Commodity: silver - Region: usa\_az - Reported Region: Arizona - Ticker: AZT #### Geometry - Grade: 173.13 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.6 m - From: 16.7 m - To: 21.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: mesothermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: Including::16.7-21.8 - Mining Method: open\_pit #### Location - CRS: UTM #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173.13 g/t silver is moderate against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 796.4 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used\). - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 173.13 Context: Including: ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.