Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-24 07:31:38 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals announced new drill results from its Tombstone Project in Arizona, highlighted by 48.6 meters averaging 133.1 gpt AgEq from surface in hole TR25-26. The company also reported an expansion of its 2025-2026 drill program by 3,500 meters, bringing the total to 12,000 meters. These results continue to demonstrate broad continuity of oxidized silver-gold mineralization and expand the target area to depth, east, and west.

Reasoning: The drill results confirm and expand the known silver-gold mineralization at the Tombstone Project with several strong intercepts, including a significant near-surface interval. The expansion of the drill program signals company confidence in the project's potential. However, the lack of true width reporting introduces some uncertainty regarding the geometry of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent intercepts, including 48.6m at 133.1 gpt AgEq from surface and sub-intervals up to 212.35 gpt AgEq.
  • Drill program expanded by 3,500 meters, indicating continued exploration success and confidence.
  • Results demonstrate broad continuity of oxidized Ag-Au mineralization to depth, east, and west, expanding the target area.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off.

Negative factors

  • All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which can range from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.
  • While strong, the new headline intercepts do not significantly exceed the project's historical best grades or grade-thickness values.

Facts used in scoring: 107

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 107. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (107)

TR25-18Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.245Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.245
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588427
Northing
3507861
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.245 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, even over a narrow interval, and is below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.245”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-18Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 48.67Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
48.67
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588427
Northing
3507861
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
65.81
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 48.67 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 65.81 gpt is also moderate. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“48.67”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-19Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588414
Northing
3507712
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.057 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 16.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-19Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.94
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588414
Northing
3507712
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.95
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 7.94 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.95 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.94”

Context: 16.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-21Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.143Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.143
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.143 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.143”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-21Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
16.2
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.21
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 16.2 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 26.21 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“16.2”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-21Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.112 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 25.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-21Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 15.73Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.73
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.53
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 15.73 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 23.53 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“15.73”

Context: 25.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-22Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.083Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.083
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.083 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.083”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-22Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.43
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 4.43 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 10.22 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.43”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-22Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.067Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.067
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
152 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.067 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.067”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-22Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
152 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.96
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.23 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 10.96 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.161 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: 16.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.25
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 7.25 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 18.56 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.25”

Context: 16.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.112 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.48
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
20.33
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 12.48 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 20.33 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.48”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.03 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-23Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.07
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.15
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.07 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 7.15 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.07”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.236
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.236 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.236”

Context: 152.4

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 19.81Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.81
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 19.81 gpt is weak, but the AgEq of 36.32 gpt is moderate, and the very long intercept length (152.4m) makes this a strong intercept (5534.9 GT). The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“19.81”

Context: 152.4

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.871Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.871
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.871 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the intercept length is moderate. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.871”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 81.41Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
81.41
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
212.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver equivalent grade of 212.35 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, and the intercept length is moderate. This is a significant sub-interval within a broader zone. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade (212.35 gpt AgEq) over a moderate interval (10.6m), resulting in a strong GT value (2251 GT).

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“81.41”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 212.35 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold (200 gpt) for silver.

Evidence · table

“212.35”

Context: 10.6

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.197Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.197
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.197 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, but the intercept length is narrow. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.197”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-24Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 92.8Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
92.8
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Hole Depth
155 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176.57
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 92.8 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 176.57 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit. The intercept length is narrow. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“92.8”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.186Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.186
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.186 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.186”

Context: 6.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
25.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 11.5 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 25.56 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: 6.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.042Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.042
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.042 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.042”

Context: 12.2

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.39 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 8.32 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: 12.2

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.106Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.106
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.106 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.106”

Context: 48.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 6.79Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.79
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.19
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.79 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 14.19 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length (48.6m) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.79”

Context: 48.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.139Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.139
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.139 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.139”

Context: 31.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 8.65Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.65
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.36
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 8.65 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 18.36 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length (31.9m) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.65”

Context: 31.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.192 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the long intercept length makes it moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: 22.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-25Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 15.15Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.15
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 15.15 gpt is weak, and the AgEq of 28.6 gpt is also weak, but the long intercept length (22.8m) makes this moderately material. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“15.15”

Context: 22.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-26Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.06 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length (48.6m) makes this a strong intercept. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 48.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-26Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 58.93Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.93
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
133.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver equivalent grade of 133.13 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length (48.6m) from surface makes this a strong and highly material result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade (133.13 gpt AgEq) over a significant interval (48.6m), resulting in a strong GT value (6468.66 GT).
  • Intercept starts from surface, indicating potential for open-pit mining.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“58.93”

Context: 48.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 133.13 gpt AgEq over 48.6m results in a GT value of 6468.66, which is above the strong threshold (3000 g/t·m) for silver.

Evidence · table

“133.13”

Context: 48.6

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-26Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.061 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TR25-26Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.34
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 4.06 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 8.34 gpt is also weak. The intercept length is narrow, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”
TC25-01Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.18 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 22.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TC25-01”

Context: 22.9

TC25-01Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 23.0 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 39.4 gpt is moderate. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“23.0”

Context: 22.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TC25-01”

Context: 22.9

TR25-02aTombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.24 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, but the very long intercept length makes it moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 62.5

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02a”

Context: 62.5

TR25-02aTombstone Project · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 19.4 gpt is weak, but the AgEq of 40.7 gpt is moderate, and the very long intercept length (62.5m) makes this a moderately material intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 62.5

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02a”

Context: 62.5

TR25-02Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.19 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 29.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 29.0

TR25-02Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 10.4 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 27.6 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: 29.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 29.0

TR25-02Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.05 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 35.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 35.1

TR25-02Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 8.7 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.8 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 35.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 35.1

TR25-02Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.08 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 9.1

TR25-02Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.4 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 12.9 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-02”

Context: 9.1

TR25-03Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.41 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length (50.3m) makes this moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 50.3

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-03”

Context: 50.3

TR25-03Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
53
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 53.0 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 89.7 gpt is also moderate, but the very long intercept length (50.3m) makes this a strong intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“53.0”

Context: 50.3

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-03”

Context: 50.3

TR25-03Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 2.26 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 2.26 gpt is above the strong threshold (2 gpt) for gold.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.1

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-03”

Context: 6.1

TR25-03Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
253
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 253.0 gpt is strong, and the AgEq of 456.6 gpt is also strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade (456.6 gpt AgEq) over a narrow interval (6.1m), resulting in a strong GT value (2785.26 GT).

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“253.0”

Context: 6.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 456.6 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold (200 gpt) for silver.

Evidence · table

“456.6”

Context: 6.1

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-03”

Context: 6.1

TR25-04Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.11 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 3.04

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-04”

Context: 3.04

TR25-04Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 27.05Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
27.05
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 27.05 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 37.17 gpt is moderate. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“27.05”

Context: 3.04

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-04”

Context: 3.04

TR25-04Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.18 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 3.04

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-04”

Context: 3.04

TR25-04Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.15
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 6.15 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 22.35 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.15”

Context: 3.04

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-04”

Context: 3.04

TR25-05Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.55 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length (47.1m) makes this moderately material. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 47.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-05”

Context: 47.1

TR25-05Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 36.36Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.36
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 36.36 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 85.46 gpt is also moderate, but the very long intercept length (47.1m) makes this a strong intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“36.36”

Context: 47.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-05”

Context: 47.1

TR25-05Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 3.91 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 3.91 gpt is above the strong threshold (2 gpt) for gold.

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 4.6

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-05”

Context: 4.6

TR25-05Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
238.73
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 238.73 gpt is strong, and the AgEq of 590.42 gpt is exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade (590.42 gpt AgEq) over a narrow interval (4.6m), resulting in a strong GT value (2715.932 GT).

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“238.73”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 590.42 gpt AgEq is above the exceptional threshold (500 gpt) for silver.

Evidence · table

“590.42”

Context: 4.6

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-05”

Context: 4.6

TR25-06Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.14 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 9.1

TR25-06Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.95
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 13.95 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 26.13 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13.95”

Context: 9.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 9.1

TR25-06Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.99 gpt is moderate for a mesothermal deposit, and the long intercept length (28.9m) makes this a moderately material intercept. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: 28.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 28.9

TR25-06Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 70.83Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
70.83
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 70.83 gpt is moderate, and the AgEq of 250.22 gpt is strong for a mesothermal deposit, over a moderate interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade (250.22 gpt AgEq) over a moderate interval (28.9m), resulting in a strong GT value (7231.378 GT).

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“70.83”

Context: 28.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 250.22 gpt AgEq is above the strong threshold (200 gpt) for silver.

Evidence · table

“250.22”

Context: 28.9

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 28.9

TR25-06Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 17.7 gpt is exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (17.7 gpt) over a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: 3.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 17.7 gpt is above the exceptional threshold (5 gpt) for gold.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: 3.0

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 3.0

TR25-06Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
556.5
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 556.5 gpt is exceptional, and the AgEq of 2149.5 gpt is also exceptional for a mesothermal deposit, over a narrow interval. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade (2149.5 gpt AgEq) over a narrow interval (3.0m), resulting in a strong GT value (6448.5 GT).

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“556.5”

Context: 3.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 2149.5 gpt AgEq is above the exceptional threshold (500 gpt) for silver.

Evidence · table

“2149.5”

Context: 3.0

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 3.0

TR25-06Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.07 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 22.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 22.8

TR25-06Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.06
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 5.06 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 11.38 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.06”

Context: 22.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-06”

Context: 22.8

TR25-07Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.14 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-07”

Context: 13.7

TR25-07Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 10.37Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.37
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 10.37 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and the AgEq of 22.64 gpt is also weak. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.37”

Context: 13.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-07”

Context: 13.7

TR25-07Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: gptIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
gpt
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
CRS
UTM
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.15 gpt is weak for a mesothermal deposit, and significantly below the project's average gold grades. This is a previously reported result. The lack of true width information adds uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 10.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is explicitly listed under 'Previously Reported Results' and has an effective date prior to the current announcement.

Evidence · table

“TR25-07”

Context: 10.6

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1.871Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.871
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.871 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.871”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 81.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
81.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 81.41 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 862.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“81.41”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.26 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.26 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
253
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 253 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1543.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 253 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“253.0”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.91 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.91 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
238.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 238.73 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1098.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 238.73 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“238.73”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 53.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
556.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 556.5 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1669.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 556.5 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“556.5”

Context: Including:

TR25-08Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: TR25-08

TR25-08Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 94.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
94.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 94.47 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1152.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“94.47”

Context: TR25-08

TR25-09Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: TR25-09

TR25-09Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 115.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.49”

Context: TR25-09

TR25-10Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.192 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: TR25-10

TR25-10Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 14.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
14.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.92 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1087.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.92”

Context: TR25-10

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.485Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.485
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.485 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.485”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 36.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.71 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 389.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.71”

Context: Including:

TR25-11Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.033
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.033 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.033”

Context: TR25-11

TR25-11Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 987.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.2”

Context: TR25-11

TR25-12Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: TR25-12

TR25-12Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.1”

Context: TR25-12

TR25-13Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.045 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: TR25-13

TR25-13Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 11.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 143.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.78”

Context: TR25-13

TR25-14Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.214 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: TR25-14

TR25-14Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 23.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.19 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2008.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.19”

Context: TR25-14

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.811Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.811
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.811 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.811”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 6168Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6168
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6168 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 93753.6 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 6168 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“61,68”

Context: Including:

TR25-15Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 21.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: TR25-15

TR25-15Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 12.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.37 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 338.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.37”

Context: TR25-15

TR25-16*Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: TR25-16*

TR25-16*Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
50.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.76 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2548.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“50.76”

Context: TR25-16*

TR25-17A*Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: TR25-17A*

TR25-17A*Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.96”

Context: TR25-17A*

TR25-17*Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 298.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Context: TR25-17*

TR25-17*Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 39.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
39.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.12 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2261.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.12”

Context: TR25-17*

Including:Tombstone Project · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 269.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“58.5”

Context: Including:

Including:Tombstone Project · silverGrade: 173.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including:
Project
Tombstone Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
173.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
mesothermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including::16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173.13 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 796.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“173.13”

Context: Including:

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.