# Azincourt Energy Reports Additional Drill Results at Snegamook Uranium Deposit Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a Original source: https://orestocks.com/company/AAZ.V/press-releases/6010891161384871 Publisher: orestocks Original announcement: 2026-10-22T07:05:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-22T07:47:16.505Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-22T07:47:16.505Z - Company: Azincourt Energy Corp. - Ticker: AAZ.V - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Labrador, Canada - Primary commodity: Uranium - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-10-22 07:47:17 UTC Narrative sentiment: -0.30 · Bearish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Azincourt Energy reported additional preliminary drill results from its Snegamook Uranium Deposit in Labrador, Canada, with four holes totaling 1,069 metres completed. Hole SN0048 intersected 19.0 metres grading 0.03% eU3O8, while SN0047 returned 0.8 metres grading 0.03% eU3O8. These results, based on radiometric equivalent grades with assays pending, are intended to advance the company's understanding of the deposit and support a potential maiden mineral resource estimate, though current grades are low compared to historical figures. Reasoning: The new drill results show significant widths in one hole but report low preliminary radiometric equivalent grades, which are substantially below historical results and the project average. While the program aims to build data for a maiden resource estimate, the current grades are not compelling, and true widths are unknown. - Positive factor: Significant intercept length in SN0048 - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Positive factor: Drilling aimed at supporting potential maiden MRE - Negative factor: Low preliminary radiometric grades compared to historical results and project average - Negative factor: Grades are preliminary radiometric equivalent \(eU3O8\), not lab assays - Negative factor: True widths not determined - Negative factor: SN0047 described as a 'near miss' for mineralization - Negative factor: Twinning of historical hole SN-08-24 \(SN0048\) did not replicate historical grades Facts used in scoring: 10 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 10. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (10) ### SN0048 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-0) Snegamook · uranium #### Identity - Hole ID: SN0048 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.03 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 19 m - From: 78.85 m - To: 97.85 m - Hole Depth: 275 m - Intercept Depth: 78.85 m #### Classification - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: SN0048:78.85-97.85 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: calibrated downhole gamma probe, comparison to geochemical analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This intercept shows significant width but a low preliminary radiometric grade, which is below typical economic thresholds and the project's historical average. True width is not determined, adding uncertainty. It contributes to understanding the deposit for a potential MRE. - Positive factor: Significant intercept length - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Negative factor: Low preliminary grade - Negative factor: True width not determined - Negative factor: Radiometric equivalent grade only - Negative factor: Grade is significantly below project average and historical results Evidence · text > Hole SN0048 intersected 19.0 metres grading 0.03% eU₃O₈, from 78.85 to 97.85 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined.' Evidence · text > All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined. **Infill Drilling** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Reason: Hole SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 to twin the historical hole, indicating infill drilling. Evidence · text > SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 at a dip of 45° to twin the historical hole. **QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Reason: The release mentions the use of a calibrated downhole gamma probe and review by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > drillholes are radiometrically logged using a calibrated downhole Mount Sopris 40TGU "Triple Gamma" probe... Radiometric equivalent probe results are subject to verification procedures by qualified persons prior to disclosure. **Cut-off Undisclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Reason: No cut-off grade is stated for the reported interval. Evidence · text > Hole SN0048 intersected 19.0 metres grading 0.03% eU₃O₈ ### SN0048 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-1) Snegamook · uranium #### Identity - Hole ID: SN0048 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.05 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.3 m - From: 85.05 m - To: 85.35 m - Hole Depth: 275 m - Intercept Depth: 78.85 m #### Classification - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: SN0048:85.05-85.35 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: calibrated downhole gamma probe, comparison to geochemical analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This very short, low-grade preliminary radiometric intercept is within a broader zone and contributes to geological understanding, but its individual significance is limited. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Negative factor: Very short intercept length - Negative factor: Low preliminary grade - Negative factor: True width not determined - Negative factor: Radiometric equivalent grade only Evidence · text > including 0.05% eU3O8over 0.3 mfrom 85.05 to 85.35 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined.' Evidence · text > All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined. **Infill Drilling** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Reason: Hole SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 to twin the historical hole, indicating infill drilling. Evidence · text > SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 at a dip of 45° to twin the historical hole. **QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Reason: The release mentions the use of a calibrated downhole gamma probe and review by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > drillholes are radiometrically logged using a calibrated downhole Mount Sopris 40TGU "Triple Gamma" probe... Radiometric equivalent probe results are subject to verification procedures by qualified persons prior to disclosure. **Cut-off Undisclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Reason: No cut-off grade is stated for the reported interval. Evidence · text > including 0.05% eU3O8over 0.3 m ### SN0048 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-2) Snegamook · uranium #### Identity - Hole ID: SN0048 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.05 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 1 m - From: 88.25 m - To: 89.25 m - Hole Depth: 275 m - Intercept Depth: 78.85 m #### Classification - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: SN0048:88.25-89.25 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: calibrated downhole gamma probe, comparison to geochemical analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This short, low-grade preliminary radiometric intercept is within a broader zone and contributes to geological understanding, but its individual significance is limited. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Negative factor: Short intercept length - Negative factor: Low preliminary grade - Negative factor: True width not determined - Negative factor: Radiometric equivalent grade only Evidence · text > and including 0.05% eU3O8over 1.0 mfrom 88.25 to 89.25 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined.' Evidence · text > All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined. **Infill Drilling** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Reason: Hole SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 to twin the historical hole, indicating infill drilling. Evidence · text > SN0048 was drilled 2.0 m away from SN-08-24 at a dip of 45° to twin the historical hole. **QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Reason: The release mentions the use of a calibrated downhole gamma probe and review by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > drillholes are radiometrically logged using a calibrated downhole Mount Sopris 40TGU "Triple Gamma" probe... Radiometric equivalent probe results are subject to verification procedures by qualified persons prior to disclosure. **Cut-off Undisclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Reason: No cut-off grade is stated for the reported interval. Evidence · text > and including 0.05% eU3O8over 1.0 m ### SN0047 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-3) Snegamook · uranium #### Identity - Hole ID: SN0047 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.03 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.8 m - From: 70.35 m - To: 71.15 m - Hole Depth: 254 m - Intercept Depth: 67.55 m #### Classification - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: SN0047:70.35-71.15 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: calibrated downhole gamma probe, comparison to geochemical analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This very short, low-grade preliminary radiometric intercept is described as a 'near miss' for mineralization, limiting its positive impact despite being a step-out hole. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Negative factor: Very short intercept length - Negative factor: Low preliminary grade - Negative factor: True width not determined - Negative factor: Radiometric equivalent grade only - Negative factor: Described as 'near miss' for mineralization Evidence · text > 0.03% eU3O8over 0.8 mfrom 70.35 to 71.15 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined.' Evidence · text > All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined. **Step-Out Extension** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit. Reason: Hole SN0047 was drilled 50 m ahead of historical hole SN-08-06 to evaluate the expression of the mineralized horizon up-dip. Evidence · text > Hole SN0047 was drilled 50 m ahead of SN-08-06 at a dip of 45° to evaluate the expression of the mineralized horizon 35 m up-dip from SN-08-06. **QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Reason: The release mentions the use of a calibrated downhole gamma probe and review by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > drillholes are radiometrically logged using a calibrated downhole Mount Sopris 40TGU "Triple Gamma" probe... Radiometric equivalent probe results are subject to verification procedures by qualified persons prior to disclosure. **Cut-off Undisclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Reason: No cut-off grade is stated for the reported interval. Evidence · text > 0.03% eU3O8over 0.8 m ### SN0047 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-4) Snegamook · uranium #### Identity - Hole ID: SN0047 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.06 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.3 m - From: 70.65 m - To: 70.95 m - Hole Depth: 254 m - Intercept Depth: 67.55 m #### Classification - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: SN0047:70.65-70.95 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: calibrated downhole gamma probe, comparison to geochemical analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This extremely short, low-grade preliminary radiometric intercept is within a broader zone and contributes to geological understanding, but its individual significance is very limited. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures mentioned - Negative factor: Extremely short intercept length - Negative factor: Low preliminary grade - Negative factor: True width not determined - Negative factor: Radiometric equivalent grade only Evidence · text > including 0.06% eU3O8over 0.3 mfrom 70.65 to 70.95 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" #### Rejected tags **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined.' Evidence · text > All reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not been determined. **Step-Out Extension** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit. Reason: Hole SN0047 was drilled 50 m ahead of historical hole SN-08-06 to evaluate the expression of the mineralized horizon up-dip. Evidence · text > Hole SN0047 was drilled 50 m ahead of SN-08-06 at a dip of 45° to evaluate the expression of the mineralized horizon 35 m up-dip from SN-08-06. **QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Reason: The release mentions the use of a calibrated downhole gamma probe and review by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > drillholes are radiometrically logged using a calibrated downhole Mount Sopris 40TGU "Triple Gamma" probe... Radiometric equivalent probe results are subject to verification procedures by qualified persons prior to disclosure. **Cut-off Undisclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Reason: No cut-off grade is stated for the reported interval. Evidence · text > including 0.06% eU3O8over 0.3 m ### SN-08-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-5) Snegamook · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: SN-08-06 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.97 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.5 m - Hole Depth: 254 m #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: zero\_all - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a historical drill result provided for context and is not new information from this release. Evidence · text > 0.97% U₃O₈ over 0.5 metres in historical hole SN-08-06 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SN-08-06 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-6) Snegamook · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: SN-08-06 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 2.71 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.1 m - Hole Depth: 254 m #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: zero\_all - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a historical check sample result from 2025, provided for context, and explicitly noted as selective and not necessarily representative. Evidence · text > a selective 2025 check sample grading 2.71% U₃O₈ over 10 centimetres. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SN-08-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-7) Snegamook · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: SN-08-24 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.05 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 20 m - Hole Depth: 275 m #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: zero\_all - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a historical drill result provided for context and is not new information from this release. Evidence · text > historical sampling had indicated 0.05% U3O8/ 20.0 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SN-08-24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-8) Snegamook · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: SN-08-24 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.118 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 2 m - Hole Depth: 275 m #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: zero\_all - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a historical drill result provided for context and is not new information from this release. Evidence · text > including 0.118% U3O8/ 2.0 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SN-08-18 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/azincourt-energy-reports-additional-drill-results-at-snegamook-uranium-deposit--9973ebff-f8c2-438b-9d1e-95edfa877f5a#fact-drill-facts-9) Snegamook · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: SN-08-18 - Project: Snegamook - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: AAZ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.35 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: zero\_all - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a historical check sample result from 2025, provided for context, and explicitly noted as selective and not necessarily representative. Evidence · text > A 10 cm check sample collected from SN-08-18... returned 0.35% U₃O₈. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.