AW1: Annual Report to Shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
American West Metals Limited
Ticker
AW1
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Indium
Secondary commodities
Copper, Zinc, Gold, Silver, Gallium, Germanium, Tellurium, Lead
Document categories
Resource update, Drill results, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-24 09:06:29 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

American West Metals Limited reported substantial progress across its North American projects, including a significant upgrade to the JORC Mineral Resource Estimate for the Storm Copper Project in Nunavut, with over 65% of contained metal now in the Indicated category. At the West Desert Project in Utah, the company announced a high-grade indium-zinc-gold discovery from its first drill hole, confirming the project's potential as a critical minerals opportunity. These operational advancements were supported by successful capital raises totaling A$17.0 million.

Reasoning: The company reported significant resource growth and confidence upgrades for the Storm Copper Project, alongside high-grade critical mineral discoveries at the West Desert Project, supported by successful capital raises.

Positive factors

  • Significant resource growth and confidence upgrade for Storm Copper Project
  • High-grade critical mineral discoveries at West Desert Project
  • Successful capital raises strengthening financial position
  • Advancement of Pre-Feasibility Study for Storm

Negative factors

  • Going concern uncertainty noted by auditor
  • Historical and non-JORC compliant estimate for Seal Project

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 106

Classification and evidence

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: More than 65% of the contained metal in the Storm MRE is now classified in the Indicated category, up from 51% in the prior estimate.

Evidence · text

“more than 65% of the contained metal is now classified in the Indicated category.”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: The Storm MRE shows a 20% increase in contained copper and a 36% increase in contained silver over the previous estimate.

Evidence · text

“This represents a 20% increase in contained copper and a 36% increase in contained silver over the previous estimate”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Storm and West Desert Mineral Resource Estimates are reported in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“The updated JORC (2012) compliant Indicated and Inferred MRE for Storm”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Storm MRE was compiled and signed off by Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, and Steve Nicholls, all Competent Persons. The West Desert MRE was signed off by Allan Schappert, a Competent Person. Exploration Results were signed off by Dave O’Neill, a Competent Person.

Evidence · text

“The information in this announcement that relates to the estimate of Mineral Resources for the Storm Project is based upon, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled and reviewed by Mr. Kevin Hon, P.Geo., Senior Geologist, Mr. Christopher Livingstone, P.Geo, Senior Geologist, Mr. Warren Black, P.Geo., Senior Geologist and Geostatistician, and Mr. Steve Nicholls, MAIG, Senior Resource Geologist, all employees of APEX Geoscience Ltd. and Competent Persons.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document presents an updated JORC (2012) compliant Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for the Storm Copper Project.

Evidence · text

“The updated JORC (2012) compliant Indicated and Inferred MRE for Storm was completed by international geological consulting company APEX Geoscience Ltd and reported to the ASX on 21 January 2026.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The West Desert Indium and Gold resource is entirely classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 15,531,071

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Drill hole PFS-002 intersected a peak interval of 0.5m @ 27.3% Cu and 80g/t Ag, which is exceptionally high-grade.

Evidence · text

“peak interval of 0.5m @ 27.3% Cu, 80g/t Ag”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole WD26-01 intersected mineralization approximately 430 m east of the existing deposit within a previously untested magnetic anomaly, confirming potential for extension.

Evidence · text

“WD26-01, intersected a continuous 108 m interval averaging 25 g/t indium... approximately 430 m east of the existing deposit within a previously untested magnetic anomaly, confirming the potential for mineralisation to extend well beyond the current Mineral Resource.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The document refers to JORC compliance and Competent Person statements for exploration results, implying QA/QC procedures are in place.

Evidence · text

“The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the results included in the original market announcements referred to in this Announcement and that no material change in the results has occurred. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The Seal Project's estimate is described as historical/foreign in nature and not reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“During 2018, a maiden estimate was prepared under NI 43-101 guidelines for the Seal zinc-silver deposit by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (P&E, 2018). The estimate is historical/foreign in nature and is not reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code.”

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: The Storm MRE was updated using a 0.25% Cu cut-off, which is lower than the previous 0.35% Cu cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm Project using a 0.35% Cu cut-off (2025) and a 0.25% Cu cut-off (2026).”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 106. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

SR25-012Storm · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SR25-012
Project
Storm
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
canada_nu
Ticker
AW1

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within SR25-012 represents a bonanza copper intercept, significantly exceeding the project average and further expanding the high-grade zone at Squall.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional copper grade, significantly higher than project average
  • Expands high-grade copper zone at Squall Prospect
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · text

“1.5m @ 3.6% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SR25-010Storm · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SR25-010
Project
Storm
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
canada_nu
Ticker
AW1

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
73.2 m
To
80.8 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SR25-010:73.2-80.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Drill hole SR25-010 returned a moderate silver intercept, confirming expansion potential at The Gap, although the grade is below the project average.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade and good intercept length
  • Confirms expansion potential at The Gap
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade is lower than project average

Evidence · text

“2.2g/t Ag from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

WD26-01West Desert · indiumGrade: 25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 108 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD26-01
Project
West Desert
Commodity
indium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AW1

Geometry

Grade
25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Drill hole WD26-01 made a significant indium discovery with an exceptional intercept length and grade-thickness product, extending mineralization well beyond the current resource and confirming potential for new zones, despite a lower average grade than previous best.

Positive factors

  • Significant indium discovery, extending mineralization 430m east of existing deposit
  • Exceptional intercept length, much greater than prior best
  • High grade-thickness product (2700 g/t*m) compared to prior best (403.3 g/t*m)
  • Confirms potential for mineralization well beyond current MRE
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade is lower than project average (25 g/t vs 88.05 g/t)

Evidence · text

“continuous 108 m interval averaging 25 g/t indium”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (103)

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 4540000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 43300Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:e2e7ec848425f269bf55
Deposit or zone
Cyclone

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4540000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
43300
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
3335000
Prior Grade
1.03
Prior Contained Metal
34200
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cyclone Inferred copper resource shows a significant increase in tonnage and contained metal, although the grade slightly decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered, indicating growth in the resource.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage and contained copper for Inferred category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade slightly decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 4,540,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 4540000 against 3335000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.95 against 1.03 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 43300 against 34200 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 4540000Grade: 3.94Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 575600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:e2e7ec848425f269bf55
Deposit or zone
Cyclone

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4540000
Grade
3.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
575600
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
3335000
Prior Grade
3.76
Prior Contained Metal
403300
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cyclone Inferred silver resource shows a significant increase in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating strong growth in the resource, despite a lowered copper equivalent cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage, grade, and contained silver for Inferred category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“3.94”

Context: 4,540,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 4540000 against 3335000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 575600 against 403300 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 12420000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 136500Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:0da1f95fa2a140435358
Deposit or zone
Cyclone

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12420000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
136500
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
9761000
Prior Grade
1.24
Prior Contained Metal
121500
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cyclone Indicated copper resource shows a significant increase in tonnage and contained metal, providing a stronger foundation for mine planning, although the grade decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage and contained copper for Indicated category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 12,420,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 12420000 against 9761000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.1 against 1.24 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 136500 against 121500 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 12420000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1527000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:0da1f95fa2a140435358
Deposit or zone
Cyclone

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12420000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1527000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
9761000
Prior Grade
4.11
Prior Contained Metal
1289400
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cyclone Indicated silver resource shows a significant increase in tonnage and contained metal, providing a stronger foundation for mine planning, although the grade slightly decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage and contained silver for Indicated category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade slightly decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 12,420,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 12420000 against 9761000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 3.82 against 4.11 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 1527000 against 1289400 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 700000Grade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4000Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:a21dbf254195a0ce5247
Deposit or zone
Chinook

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4000
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
913000
Prior Grade
0.81
Prior Contained Metal
7400
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chinook Inferred copper resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained metal compared to the prior estimate, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained copper compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 700000 against 913000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.56 against 0.81 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 4000 against 7400 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 700000Grade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 59600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:a21dbf254195a0ce5247
Deposit or zone
Chinook

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
2.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
59600
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
913000
Prior Grade
2.85
Prior Contained Metal
83700
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chinook Inferred silver resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained metal compared to the prior estimate, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained silver compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“2.63”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 700000 against 913000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 2.63 against 2.85 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 59600 against 83700 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 1040000Grade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:a8b90d561ae99dc82e17
Deposit or zone
Chinook

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1040000
Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16900
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
857000
Prior Grade
1.92
Prior Contained Metal
16500
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chinook Indicated copper resource shows an increase in tonnage and contained metal, providing a stronger foundation, although the grade decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Increase in tonnage and contained copper for Indicated category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 1,040,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 1040000 against 857000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.62 against 1.92 previously

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 16900 from 16500

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 1040000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 127800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:a8b90d561ae99dc82e17
Deposit or zone
Chinook

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1040000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
127800
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
857000
Prior Grade
4.37
Prior Contained Metal
120200
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chinook Indicated silver resource shows an increase in tonnage and contained metal, providing a stronger foundation, although the grade decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Increase in tonnage and contained silver for Indicated category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 1,040,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 1040000 against 857000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 3.82 against 4.37 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 127800 against 120200 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 1360000Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1e00a802bdf4e0623f13
Deposit or zone
Corona

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1360000
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8900
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1880000
Prior Grade
0.85
Prior Contained Metal
15900
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Corona Inferred copper resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained metal compared to the prior estimate, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained copper compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 1,360,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1360000 against 1880000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.65 against 0.85 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 8900 against 15900 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 1360000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 87500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1e00a802bdf4e0623f13
Deposit or zone
Corona

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1360000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
87500
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1880000
Prior Grade
1.51
Prior Contained Metal
91500
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Corona Inferred silver resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage and contained metal, despite an increase in grade, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Grade increased compared to prior estimate
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage and contained silver compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 1,360,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1360000 against 1880000 previously

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 2 against 1.51 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 87500 against 91500 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 1220000Grade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11200Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1bd6216e8f9c75621f0a
Deposit or zone
Corona

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1220000
Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
11200
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Corona deposit now has an Indicated copper resource, which is a positive step in de-risking the project, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • New Indicated resource for Corona deposit
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 1,220,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 1220000Grade: 2.85Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 112100Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1bd6216e8f9c75621f0a
Deposit or zone
Corona

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1220000
Grade
2.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
112100
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Corona deposit now has an Indicated silver resource, which is a positive step in de-risking the project, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • New Indicated resource for Corona deposit
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“2.85”

Context: 1,220,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 1500000Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8600Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:8b8742a1267ac158e000
Deposit or zone
Thunder

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1500000
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8600
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1824000
Prior Grade
1.04
Prior Contained Metal
19000
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thunder Inferred copper resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained metal compared to the prior estimate, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained copper compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 1,500,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1500000 against 1824000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.58 against 1.04 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 8600 against 19000 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 1500000Grade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 60000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:8b8742a1267ac158e000
Deposit or zone
Thunder

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1500000
Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
60000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1824000
Prior Grade
1.55
Prior Contained Metal
90800
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thunder Inferred silver resource shows a significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained metal compared to the prior estimate, which is concerning given the lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Significant decrease in tonnage, grade, and contained silver compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which should have increased tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 1,500,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1500000 against 1824000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.24 against 1.55 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 60000 against 90800 previously

indicatedStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 1250000Grade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 15300Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1c216c0183b583c416df
Deposit or zone
Thunder

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1250000
Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
15300
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thunder deposit now has an Indicated copper resource, which is a positive step in de-risking the project, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • New Indicated resource for Thunder deposit
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 1,250,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 1250000Grade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 73600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:1c216c0183b583c416df
Deposit or zone
Thunder

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1250000
Grade
1.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
73600
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thunder deposit now has an Indicated silver resource, which is a positive step in de-risking the project, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • New Indicated resource for Thunder deposit
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.83”

Context: 1,250,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 2650000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16700Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:5596f3ff99f0a00dc5a2
Deposit or zone
Cirrus

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2650000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16700
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1552000
Prior Grade
0.62
Prior Contained Metal
9600
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cirrus Inferred copper resource shows a significant increase in tonnage and contained metal with a slight grade improvement, indicating growth in the resource, despite a lowered cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage and contained copper for Inferred category
  • Grade slightly increased compared to prior estimate
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 2,650,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 2650000 against 1552000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 16700 against 9600 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 2650000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 122300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:5596f3ff99f0a00dc5a2
Deposit or zone
Cirrus

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2650000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
122300
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
1552000
Prior Grade
1.29
Prior Contained Metal
64300
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Cirrus Inferred silver resource shows a significant increase in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating strong growth in the resource, despite a lowered copper equivalent cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage, grade, and contained silver for Inferred category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 2,650,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 2650000 against 1552000 previously

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 1.43 against 1.29 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 122300 against 64300 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 700000Grade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8800Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:73c6f07ccbcac32cfa6c
Deposit or zone
Gap

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8800
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Gap Deposit has been added to the MRE with a new Inferred copper resource, representing a positive expansion of the overall resource base, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Maiden resource for the Gap Deposit, adding new mineralization to the MRE
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 700000Grade: 4.99Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 112600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:73c6f07ccbcac32cfa6c
Deposit or zone
Gap

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
4.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
112600
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Gap Deposit has been added to the MRE with a new Inferred silver resource, representing a positive expansion of the overall resource base, although the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Maiden resource for the Gap Deposit, adding new mineralization to the MRE
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“4.99”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredStorm Copper Project · copperTonnes: 810000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:36b22c1ca8ab00e3687b
Deposit or zone
Lightning Ridge

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
810000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5900
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
491000
Prior Grade
0.93
Prior Contained Metal
4600
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Lightning Ridge Inferred copper resource shows an increase in tonnage and contained metal, although the grade decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Increase in tonnage and contained copper for Inferred category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 810,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 810000 against 491000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.73 against 0.93 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 5900 against 4600 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.25 against 0.35 previously

inferredStorm Copper Project · silverTonnes: 810000Grade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 107400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Storm Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Christopher Livingstone, Warren Black, Steve Nicholls
Resource group id
resource:36b22c1ca8ab00e3687b
Deposit or zone
Lightning Ridge

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
810000
Grade
4.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
107400
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-21
Prior Tonnes
491000
Prior Grade
4.37
Prior Contained Metal
69000
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Lightning Ridge Inferred silver resource shows a significant increase in tonnage and contained metal, although the grade slightly decreased and the cut-off grade was lowered.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in tonnage and contained silver for Inferred category
  • New estimate is JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade slightly decreased compared to prior estimate
  • Cut-off grade was lowered, which can inflate tonnage

Evidence · table

“4.11”

Context: 810,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 810000 against 491000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 4.11 against 4.37 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 107400 against 69000 previously

indicatedWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 27349163Grade: 1037278Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 1037278Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:c42ea458576e86681df2

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27349163
Grade
1037278
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
1037278
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a large Indicated zinc resource, providing a strong foundation for future development, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated zinc resource
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“1,037,278”

Context: 27,349,163

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 27349163Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 40588Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:c42ea458576e86681df2

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27349163
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
40588
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a significant Indicated copper resource, contributing to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated copper resource
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 27,349,163

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 27349163Grade: 9.53Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8376494Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:c42ea458576e86681df2

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27349163
Grade
9.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8376494
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a significant Indicated silver resource, contributing to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated silver resource
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“9.53”

Context: 27,349,163

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 6318875Grade: 253626Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 253626Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:e9b1ca8eccec80e300eb

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6318875
Grade
253626
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
253626
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes a substantial Inferred zinc resource, indicating future potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Substantial Inferred zinc resource
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“253,626”

Context: 6,318,875

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 6318875Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8465Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:e9b1ca8eccec80e300eb

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6318875
Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8465
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes an Inferred copper resource, adding to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred copper resource contributes to overall project value
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 6,318,875

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 6318875Grade: 7.13Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1440285Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:e9b1ca8eccec80e300eb

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6318875
Grade
7.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1440285
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn equivalent

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes an Inferred silver resource, adding to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver resource contributes to overall project value
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“7.13”

Context: 6,318,875

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · indiumTonnes: 15531071Grade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5916698Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
indium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:0317e2a77c4b19051b84
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
15531071
Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5916698
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a large Inferred indium resource in open-pit oxide material, highlighting its critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred indium resource in open-pit oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“10.8”

Context: 15,531,071

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · goldTonnes: 15531071Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 49306Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:0317e2a77c4b19051b84
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
15531071
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
49306
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes an Inferred gold resource in open-pit oxide material, contributing to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Inferred gold resource in open-pit oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 15,531,071

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · indiumTonnes: 3140102Grade: 23.89Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2646148Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
indium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:45d8516e8f3ef1614f0e
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
23.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2646148
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a high-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material, highlighting its critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“23.89”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · goldTonnes: 3140102Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 11076Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:45d8516e8f3ef1614f0e
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
11076
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes an Inferred gold resource in open-pit sulphide material, contributing to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Inferred gold resource in open-pit sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · indiumTonnes: 14996864Grade: 28.73Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15198136Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
indium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:073f6a0472441c162852
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14996864
Grade
28.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
15198136
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a very high-grade Inferred indium resource in underground sulphide material, highlighting its significant critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade Inferred indium resource in underground sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“28.73”

Context: 14,996,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · goldTonnes: 14996864Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 63480Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:073f6a0472441c162852
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14996864
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
63480
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project includes an Inferred gold resource in underground sulphide material, contributing to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Inferred gold resource in underground sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 14,996,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredSeal Project · zincHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Seal Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:7c241bf92c672cae046a

Resource Data

Category
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Seal Project's historical zinc estimate is not JORC compliant and lacks current verification, making it a low-confidence and low-materiality item in this report.

Positive factors

  • Indicates historical potential for zinc mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical Estimate Only
  • Not JORC Compliant
  • No tonnage or grade provided in this document
  • Limited work undertaken to verify estimates

Evidence · text

“maiden estimate was prepared under NI 43-101 guidelines for the Seal zinc-silver deposit by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (P&E, 2018). The estimate is historical/foreign in nature and is not reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code.”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 8.7 years before this release

inferredSeal Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Seal Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nu
Reported Region
Nunavut
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:7c241bf92c672cae046a

Resource Data

Category
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Seal Project's historical silver estimate is not JORC compliant and lacks current verification, making it a low-confidence and low-materiality item in this report.

Positive factors

  • Indicates historical potential for silver mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical Estimate Only
  • Not JORC Compliant
  • No tonnage or grade provided in this document
  • Limited work undertaken to verify estimates

Evidence · text

“maiden estimate was prepared under NI 43-101 guidelines for the Seal zinc-silver deposit by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (P&E, 2018). The estimate is historical/foreign in nature and is not reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code.”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 8.7 years before this release

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 4540000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 43300Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:654275fb2f2c52d36d90

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4540000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
43300
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 4,540,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 4540000Grade: 3.94Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 575600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:654275fb2f2c52d36d90

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4540000
Grade
3.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
575600
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.94”

Context: 4,540,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 12420000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 136500Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:b8c1b7b03fb555fa51bb

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12420000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
136500
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 12,420,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 12420000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1527000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:b8c1b7b03fb555fa51bb

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12420000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1527000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 12,420,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 700000Grade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8800Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:22ff91c56ae7a7f1ff1a

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8800
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 700000Grade: 4.99Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 112600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:22ff91c56ae7a7f1ff1a

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
4.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
112600
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“4.99”

Context: 700,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1040000Grade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:cb17d4f3476351827770

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1040000
Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16900
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 1,040,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1040000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 127800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:cb17d4f3476351827770

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1040000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
127800
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 1,040,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1360000Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:e91dced840f11bcdcbff

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1360000
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8900
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 1,360,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1360000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 87500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:e91dced840f11bcdcbff

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1360000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
87500
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 1,360,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1220000Grade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11200Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:164f94f95b837792fcc9

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1220000
Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
11200
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 1,220,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1220000Grade: 2.85Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 112100Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:164f94f95b837792fcc9

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1220000
Grade
2.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
112100
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.85”

Context: 1,220,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1500000Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8600Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:70fdf4afdfb2272b7d60

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1500000
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8600
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 1,500,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1500000Grade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 60000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:70fdf4afdfb2272b7d60

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1500000
Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
60000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 1,500,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1250000Grade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 15300Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:b4d1e5927cd1610b98b5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1250000
Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
15300
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 1,250,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1250000Grade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 73600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:b4d1e5927cd1610b98b5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1250000
Grade
1.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
73600
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.83”

Context: 1,250,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 2650000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16700Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:e44c86959cb03c6819a1

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2650000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16700
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 2,650,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 2650000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 122300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:e44c86959cb03c6819a1

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2650000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
122300
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 2,650,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · copperTonnes: 810000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:d52eb25ddde6a863fa03

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
810000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5900
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 810,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained MRE of the Storm · silverTonnes: 810000Grade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 107400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained MRE of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:d52eb25ddde6a863fa03

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
810000
Grade
4.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
107400
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“4.11”

Context: 810,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 4493988Grade: 59446Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 59446Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:3ef4151406054614cc79
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4493988
Grade
59446
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
59446
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated zinc resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category provides a clear pathway for potential extraction, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated zinc resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“59,446”

Context: 4,493,988

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 4493988Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3304Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:3ef4151406054614cc79
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4493988
Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3304
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category contributes to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated copper resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 4,493,988

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 4493988Grade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1324438Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:3ef4151406054614cc79
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4493988
Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1324438
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated silver resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category adds to the project's economic potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: 4,493,988

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 528095Grade: 6845Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 6845Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:5ddcd6106824bf8a73ae
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
528095
Grade
6845
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
6845
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred zinc resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category provides additional potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred zinc resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“6,845”

Context: 528,095

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 528095Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 211Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:5ddcd6106824bf8a73ae
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
528095
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
211
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category contributes to the overall project, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred copper resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 528,095

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 528095Grade: 10.92Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 185387Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:5ddcd6106824bf8a73ae
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
528095
Grade
10.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
185387
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource in the open-pit heap leach oxide category adds to the project's potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver resource in open-pit heap leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“10.92”

Context: 528,095

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 9719064Grade: 333737Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 333737Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:50c0602dfcd1a0123ad8
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9719064
Grade
333737
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
333737
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large Indicated zinc resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category provides a strong foundation for future extraction, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated zinc resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“333,737”

Context: 9,719,064

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 9719064Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11630Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:50c0602dfcd1a0123ad8
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9719064
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
11630
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category contributes to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated copper resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 9,719,064

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 9719064Grade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3425247Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:50c0602dfcd1a0123ad8
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9719064
Grade
10.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3425247
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The significant Indicated silver resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category adds to the project's economic potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated silver resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“10.96”

Context: 9,719,064

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 789925Grade: 21034Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 21034Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:fc7df79e162e24219c7c
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
789925
Grade
21034
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
21034
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred zinc resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category provides additional potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred zinc resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“21,034”

Context: 789,925

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 789925Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 747Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:fc7df79e162e24219c7c
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
789925
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
747
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category contributes to the overall project, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred copper resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 789,925

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 789925Grade: 8.98Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 228008Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:fc7df79e162e24219c7c
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
789925
Grade
8.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
228008
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource in the open-pit mill leach oxide category adds to the project's potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver resource in open-pit mill leach oxide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“8.98”

Context: 789,925

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 3074980Grade: 92108Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 92108Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:9a3ccf7549ca30618bcd
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3074980
Grade
92108
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
92108
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated zinc resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category provides a clear pathway for potential extraction, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated zinc resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“92,108”

Context: 3,074,980

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 3074980Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5780Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:9a3ccf7549ca30618bcd
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3074980
Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5780
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category contributes to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated copper resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 3,074,980

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 3074980Grade: 13.84Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1367936Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:9a3ccf7549ca30618bcd
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3074980
Grade
13.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1367936
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The significant Indicated silver resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category adds to the project's economic potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated silver resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“13.84”

Context: 3,074,980

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 65122Grade: 1719Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 1719Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:188450bdb876b3a8d9cb
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
65122
Grade
1719
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
1719
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred zinc resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category provides additional potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred zinc resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“1,719”

Context: 65,122

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 65122Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 78Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:188450bdb876b3a8d9cb
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
65122
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
78
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category contributes to the overall project, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred copper resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 65,122

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 65122Grade: 11.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 24487Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:188450bdb876b3a8d9cb
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
65122
Grade
11.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
24487
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource in the open-pit mill flotation sulphide category adds to the project's potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver resource in open-pit mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“11.70”

Context: 65,122

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 3140102Grade: 93826Grade Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f490bc7c0c91f2477319
Mining method
open_pit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
93826
Grade Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a high-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material, highlighting its critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“93,826”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 3140102Grade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5858Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f490bc7c0c91f2477319
Mining method
open_pit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5858
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a high-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material, highlighting its critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 3140102Grade: 13.79Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1392423Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f490bc7c0c91f2477319
Mining method
open_pit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
13.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1392423
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-12-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The West Desert Project hosts a high-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material, highlighting its critical mineral potential, with no changes reported in the current year. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred indium resource in open-pit sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Indium is a critical mineral

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“13.79”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.8 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 10061132Grade: 551988Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 551988Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f5efa5663babcc07b10b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10061132
Grade
551988
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
551988
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large Indicated zinc resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category provides a strong foundation for future extraction, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated zinc resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“551,988”

Context: 10,061,132

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 10061132Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 19874Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f5efa5663babcc07b10b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10061132
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
19874
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category contributes to the overall project value, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated copper resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 10,061,132

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

indicatedWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 10061132Grade: 6.98Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2258872Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:f5efa5663babcc07b10b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10061132
Grade
6.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2258872
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The significant Indicated silver resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category adds to the project's economic potential, with no changes reported in the current year.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated silver resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Evidence · table

“6.98”

Context: 10,061,132

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · zincTonnes: 4935733Grade: 224026Grade Unit: tContained Metal: 224026Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:92b92d41f58b8915f00b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4935733
Grade
224026
Grade Unit
t
Contained Metal
224026
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The substantial Inferred zinc resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category provides additional potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Substantial Inferred zinc resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“224,026”

Context: 4,935,733

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · copperTonnes: 4935733Grade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 7429Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:92b92d41f58b8915f00b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4935733
Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
7429
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category contributes to the overall project, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred copper resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 4,935,733

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredWest Desert Project · silverTonnes: 4935733Grade: 6.36Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1009632Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
West Desert Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Schappert
Resource group id
resource:92b92d41f58b8915f00b
Mining method
underground
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4935733
Grade
6.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1009632
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
3.5
Cutoff Unit
% Zn

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-02-09

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource in the underground mill flotation sulphide category adds to the project's potential, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver resource in underground mill flotation sulphide material
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“6.36”

Context: 4,935,733

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.6 years before this release

inferredJORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and · goldTonnes: 15531071Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 49306Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
JORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and
Commodity
gold
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:a4595b2c885cefcf2c74
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
15531071
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
49306
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 15,531,071

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and · goldTonnes: 3140102Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 11076Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
JORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and
Commodity
gold
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:70555cd6e642aaa694ce
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3140102
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
11076
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 3,140,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and · goldTonnes: 14996864Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 63480Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
JORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and
Commodity
gold
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:cd000c666810469867af
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14996864
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
63480
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 14,996,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and · goldTonnes: 0.1Grade: 118761Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
JORC 2012 compliant West Desert Indium and
Commodity
gold
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:344aca5d679b46226d5a

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
0.1
Grade
118761
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“118,761”

Context: 0.10

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 3335000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 34200Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:0b485dfbb3a272ae920a

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3335000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
34200
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 3,335,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 3335000Grade: 3.94Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 403300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:0b485dfbb3a272ae920a

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3335000
Grade
3.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
403300
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.94”

Context: 3,335,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 9761000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 121500Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:865722b13bdb13c97dcc

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9761000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
121500
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 9,761,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 9761000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1289400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:865722b13bdb13c97dcc

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9761000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1289400
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 9,761,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 913000Grade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 7400Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:ec0aab198f84ebe4a4b8

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
913000
Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
7400
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 913,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 913000Grade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 83700Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:ec0aab198f84ebe4a4b8

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
913000
Grade
2.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
83700
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.63”

Context: 913,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 857000Grade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16500Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:42fb23f244dba374e367

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
857000
Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16500
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 857,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 857000Grade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 120200Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:42fb23f244dba374e367

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
857000
Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
120200
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 857,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1880000Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 15900Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:96b8bb35369c259b673e

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1880000
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
15900
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 1,880,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1880000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 91500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:96b8bb35369c259b673e

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1880000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
91500
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 1,880,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1552000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 9600Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:18ab445f6e87e2f56ce2

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1552000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
9600
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 1,552,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1552000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 64300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:18ab445f6e87e2f56ce2

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1552000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
64300
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 1,552,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 1824000Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 19000Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:3a73dec8a15f57bc1251

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1824000
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
19000
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 1,824,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 1824000Grade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 90800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:3a73dec8a15f57bc1251

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1824000
Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
90800
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 1,824,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · copperTonnes: 491000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4600Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
copper
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:7839dce6e84881991f06

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
491000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4600
Contained Unit
t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 491,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTotal unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm · silverTonnes: 491000Grade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 69000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Total unconstrained 2025 and 2026 MREs of the Storm
Commodity
silver
Ticker
AW1

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:7839dce6e84881991f06

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
491000
Grade
4.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
69000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“4.11”

Context: 491,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.