Auriginal Intersects 45.5 m of 1.05 g/t Au and 29.4 m of 1.32 g/t Au at Roger, Extending Gold-Copper Mineralization at Depth; Updated Mineral Resource Estimate Expected Before Year-End 2026

Original announcement by jmn on

Company
Auriginal Mining Corp.
Ticker
AUME
Exchange
TSXV
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-15 10:21:14 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Auriginal Mining announced significant drill results from its Roger Project in Quebec, including 45.5 m grading 1.05 g/t Au and 29.4 m grading 1.32 g/t Au, extending gold-copper mineralization at depth. The drilling confirmed both porphyry-style and gold-rich VMS mineralization, with several high-grade polymetallic sub-intervals. The company expects to publish an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Roger Zone before year-end 2026, which will not include the current drilling, with a further update incorporating these new results targeted for the first half of 2027.

Reasoning: Auriginal Mining reported strong drill results from its Roger Project, extending gold-copper mineralization at depth and along strike with several high-grade polymetallic intercepts. The results confirm both porphyry and VMS mineralization styles and are supported by robust QA/QC. An updated MRE is expected, but will not include these new results, with a further update planned for 2027.

Positive factors

  • Broad gold-copper mineralization extended at depth and along strike
  • High-grade polymetallic sub-intervals confirm VMS component
  • Deepest mineralized intercept reported to date
  • Strong QA/QC protocols and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • True widths are estimated, not precisely stated for each intercept

Facts used in scoring: 114

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Phase 1 drilling has extended the Roger mineralized system to at least 1.4 km of strike and at least 150 m below the limits of historical drilling.

Evidence · text

“Phase 1 drilling has extended the Roger mineralized system to at least 1.4 km of strike and at least 150 m below the limits of historical drilling.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly states strict QA/QC protocols including certified reference materials, duplicates, and blanks, and names Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs) as the testing facility.

Evidence · text

“Strict QA/QC protocols are in place for the Roger Project, including the insertion of certified reference materials (standards), duplicates and blanks at regular intervals throughout the sample sequence. Samples were collected from half-split NQ-size drill core; duplicate samples were derived from quarter-cut core. A total of 1,864 drill core samples, including 94 QA/QC samples, were sent to Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs). Sample preparation and analysis were carried out at Actlabs' facilities in Val-d'Or, Quebec and Ancaster, Ontario, using the analytical packages "UT-8" and "4Litho".”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Michel Leblanc, géo. (613) and André Liboiron, géo. (617), independent consultants to Auriginal Mining Corp. and Qualified Persons as defined in National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Michel Leblanc, géo. (613) and André Liboiron, géo. (617), independent consultants to Auriginal Mining Corp. and Qualified Persons as defined in National Instrument 43-101.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that 'Intervals are core lengths. True widths are estimated at approximately 65% of the core intervals reported.' but does not provide specific true widths for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are core lengths. True widths are estimated at approximately 65% of the core intervals reported.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 2.2 m grading 12.2 g/t Au, 31.9 g/t Ag, 0.35% Cu and 0.21% Zn in AUR-26-12 includes gold grades that are strong for porphyry and VMS, and silver, copper, and zinc grades that are strong to exceptional for VMS.

Evidence · table

“12.2”

Context: 2.2

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 1.3 m grading 14.0 g/t Au, 44.9 g/t Ag and 1.47% Cu in AUR-26-10 includes gold grades that are strong for porphyry and VMS, and copper grades that are exceptional for VMS.

Evidence · table

“14.0”

Context: 1.3

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 0.5 m grading 8.41 g/t Au, 106.0 g/t Ag and 0.84% Cu in AUR-26-09 includes gold grades that are strong for porphyry and VMS, and silver grades that are exceptional for VMS.

Evidence · table

“8.41”

Context: 0.5

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 114. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (114)

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.7 m
From
127.3 m
To
134 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:127.3-134
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept contributes to the overall drill program, but the gold grade is relatively low for a porphyry deposit.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 6.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.5 m
From
183 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:183-192.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows gold mineralization, but the grade is below the moderate threshold for a porphyry deposit.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 9.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
235.5 m
To
243 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:235.5-243
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold mineralization within the porphyry system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Grade is near moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 7.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
235.5 m
To
237 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:235.5-237
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“4.22”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.5 m
From
256.5 m
To
265 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:256.5-265
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization within the porphyry system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.2 m
From
343 m
To
346.2 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:343-346.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows gold mineralization, but the grade is below the moderate threshold for a porphyry deposit.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 3.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
344.8 m
To
346.2 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:344.8-346.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: 1.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
378 m
To
379.5 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:378-379.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold mineralization within the porphyry system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Grade is near moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.3 m
From
397.5 m
To
429.8 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:397.5-429.8
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 33.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
425 m
To
427.5 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:425-427.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.5 m
From
524 m
To
533.5 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:524-533.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 9.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
355.5 m
To
361.5 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:355.5-361.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows gold mineralization, but the grade is below the moderate threshold for a porphyry deposit.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
412.3 m
To
415 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:412.3-415
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold mineralization within the porphyry system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
658.9 m
To
663 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:658.9-663
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold mineralization at a significant depth, contributing to the understanding of the system's vertical extent.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · goldGrade: 8.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
8.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade gold intercept, part of a polymetallic zone, confirms mineralization at the deepest level drilled to date, supporting the VMS component.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in VMS
  • Deepest mineralized intercept reported to date

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“8.41”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · silverGrade: 106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
106
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional silver grade within a polymetallic intercept at depth further supports the VMS potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept
  • Grade is exceptional for silver

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“106.0”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09Roger · copperGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong copper grade within a polymetallic intercept at depth further supports the VMS potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Grade is strong for copper in VMS

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.6 m
From
167.4 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:167.4-186
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 18.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
171.5 m
To
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:171.5-181.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.7 m
From
246 m
To
266.7 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:246-266.7
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 20.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
254.9 m
To
255.9 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:254.9-255.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“2.07”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
276 m
To
297 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:276-297
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 21.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.9 m
From
318.1 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:318.1-335
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 16.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:334-335
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.4 m
From
402 m
To
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:402-431.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate gold mineralization, contributing significantly to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 29.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade gold intercept, part of a polymetallic zone, supports the VMS component of the system.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in VMS
  • Polymetallic nature (Ag, Cu)

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“14.0”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · silverGrade: 44.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
44.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate silver grade within a polymetallic intercept further supports the VMS potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept
  • Grade is moderate for silver

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“44.9”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · copperGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong copper grade within a polymetallic intercept further supports the VMS potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Grade is strong for copper in VMS

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 12.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
12.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
430 m
To
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:430-431.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade gold sub-interval further enhances the overall intercept, indicating strong localized mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“12.3”

Context: 1.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28 m
From
502 m
To
530 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:502-530
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 28.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
507 m
To
510 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:507-510
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
517 m
To
518 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:517-518
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
570.5 m
To
577 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:570.5-577
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system but not economically significant on its own.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 4.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
589 m
To
590 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:589-590
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept indicates localized stronger mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“4.87”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
603.7 m
To
628 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:603.7-628
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate gold mineralization, demonstrating continuity at deeper levels.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry
  • Demonstrates gold grades sustained at deepest levels tested in this hole

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
606 m
To
610 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:606-610
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader deep intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
615 m
To
617.2 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:615-617.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader deep intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“2.15”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
626 m
To
627 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:626-627
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader deep intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“3.53”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10Roger · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.6 m
From
651.5 m
To
663.1 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10:651.5-663.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, weak gold mineralization at depth, contributing to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 11.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.2 m
From
111 m
To
134.2 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:111-134.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate gold mineralization near surface, contributing significantly to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 23.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
131 m
To
132.5 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:131-132.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader near-surface intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“16.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
207 m
To
226.5 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:207-226.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate gold mineralization, contributing significantly to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 19.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
209.5 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:209.5-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization, enhancing the overall intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · silverGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
209.5 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:209.5-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization, contributing to the polymetallic understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for silver

Evidence · table

“2.66”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 7.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
7.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
222.8 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:222.8-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates localized stronger mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“7.01”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37 m
From
308 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:308-345
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 37.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
327 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:327-345
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad sub-interval shows moderate gold mineralization, enhancing the overall intercept.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 18.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · silverGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
327 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:327-345
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization, contributing to the polymetallic understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for silver

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 18.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade gold intercept, part of a polymetallic zone, supports the VMS component of the system.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in VMS
  • Polymetallic nature (Ag, Cu)

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · silverGrade: 14.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
14.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for silver
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“14.5”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak copper mineralization within a polymetallic zone.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for copper in VMS
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
45.5 m
From
397 m
To
442.5 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:397-442.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional intercept length with moderate gold grade significantly extends mineralization at depth, representing a key highlight of the drilling program.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program
  • Exceptional intercept length
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry
  • Extends mineralization at depth

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 45.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.5 m
From
397 m
To
415.5 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:397-415.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad, high-grade sub-interval significantly enhances the overall intercept, indicating strong mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Significant intercept length
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“2.04”

Context: 18.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 4.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
397 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:397-405
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval further enhances the overall intercept, indicating strong localized mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“4.37”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
12.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade gold intercept, part of a significant polymetallic zone, strongly supports the VMS component of the system at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is strong for gold in VMS
  • Polymetallic nature (Ag, Cu, Zn)

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“12.2”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · silverGrade: 31.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
31.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade within a polymetallic intercept further supports the VMS potential at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept
  • Grade is weak for silver

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“31.9”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade within a polymetallic intercept further supports the VMS potential at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Grade is weak for copper in VMS

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc grade within a polymetallic intercept further supports the VMS potential at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade zinc intercept
  • Grade is weak for zinc

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
427 m
To
431 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:427-431
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate gold grade sub-interval further enhances the overall intercept, indicating localized mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval within broader mineralization
  • Grade is moderate for gold in porphyry

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12Roger · silverGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
427 m
To
431 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12:427-431
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization, contributing to the polymetallic understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for silver

Evidence · table

“11.4”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08 (-65 )Roger · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08 (-65 )
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.7 m
From
127.3 m
To
134 m
Intercept Depth
127.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08 (-65 ):127.3-134
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: AUR-26-08 (-65 )

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
235.5 m
To
237 m
Intercept Depth
235.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:235.5-237
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.22 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.22 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.22”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
344.8 m
To
346.2 m
Intercept Depth
344.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:344.8-346.2
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.23 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.23 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
425 m
To
427.5 m
Intercept Depth
425 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:425-427.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.47 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.47 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-09 (-65 )Roger · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-09 (-65 )
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
355.5 m
To
361.5 m
Intercept Depth
355.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-09 (-65 ):355.5-361.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.51 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: AUR-26-09 (-65 )

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
412.3 m
To
415 m
Intercept Depth
412.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:412.3-415
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.26 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.26 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
658.9 m
To
663 m
Intercept Depth
658.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:658.9-663
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.22 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 8.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
8.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
659.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.41 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.41 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.41”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · silverGrade: 106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
106
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
659.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 106 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“106.0”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
659.4 m
To
659.9 m
Intercept Depth
659.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:659.4-659.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.84 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-10 (-65 )Roger · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-10 (-65 )
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.6 m
From
167.4 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
167.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-10 (-65 ):167.4-186
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: AUR-26-10 (-65 )

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
171.5 m
To
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
171.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:171.5-181.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.7 m
From
246 m
To
266.7 m
Intercept Depth
246 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:246-266.7
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
254.9 m
To
255.9 m
Intercept Depth
254.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:254.9-255.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.07 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.07 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.07”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
276 m
To
297 m
Intercept Depth
276 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:276-297
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.9 m
From
318.1 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
318.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:318.1-335
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
334 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:334-335
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.29 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.4 m
From
402 m
To
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:402-431.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.32 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 38.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.32 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
410.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.0”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · silverGrade: 44.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
44.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
410.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“44.9”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · copperGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
410.1 m
To
411.4 m
Intercept Depth
410.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:410.1-411.4
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.47 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 12.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
12.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
430 m
To
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
430 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:430-431.4
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.3”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28 m
From
502 m
To
530 m
Intercept Depth
502 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:502-530
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
507 m
To
510 m
Intercept Depth
507 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:507-510
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.37 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
517 m
To
518 m
Intercept Depth
517 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:517-518
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.22 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
570.5 m
To
577 m
Intercept Depth
570.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:570.5-577
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 4.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
589 m
To
590 m
Intercept Depth
589 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:589-590
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.87 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.87 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.87”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
603.7 m
To
628 m
Intercept Depth
603.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:603.7-628
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 25.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.04 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
606 m
To
610 m
Intercept Depth
606 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:606-610
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.82 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.82 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
615 m
To
617.2 m
Intercept Depth
615 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:615-617.2
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.15”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
626 m
To
627 m
Intercept Depth
626 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:626-627
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.53 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.53”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.6 m
From
651.5 m
To
663.1 m
Intercept Depth
651.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:651.5-663.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-12 (-52 )Roger · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-12 (-52 )
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.2 m
From
111 m
To
134.2 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-12 (-52 ):111-134.2
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: AUR-26-12 (-52 )

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
131 m
To
132.5 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:131-132.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 24.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.3”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
207 m
To
226.5 m
Intercept Depth
207 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:207-226.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.51 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 29.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.51 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
209.5 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
209.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:209.5-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.72 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 28.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.72 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · silverGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
209.5 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
209.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:209.5-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.66 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.66 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.66”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 7.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
7.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
222.8 m
To
225.7 m
Intercept Depth
222.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:222.8-225.7
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.01”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37 m
From
308 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
308 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:308-345
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 23.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.64 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
327 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:327-345
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.04 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · silverGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
327 m
To
345 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:327-345
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.82 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · silverGrade: 14.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
14.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.5”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
327 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:327-328.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-08Roger · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-08
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
45.5 m
From
397 m
To
442.5 m
Intercept Depth
397 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-08:397-442.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 47.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.05 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: Table 1 - Significant assay results, hol

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.5 m
From
397 m
To
415.5 m
Intercept Depth
397 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:397-415.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.04 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 37.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.04 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.04”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 4.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
397 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
397 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:397-405
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.37 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 35.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.37 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.37”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
12.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
402.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 26.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.2”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · silverGrade: 31.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
31.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
402.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.9”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
402.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
402.8 m
To
405 m
Intercept Depth
402.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:402.8-405
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
427 m
To
431 m
Intercept Depth
427 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:427-431
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

and incl.Roger · silverGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Roger
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
427 m
To
431 m
Intercept Depth
427 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:427-431
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.4”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

AUR-26-20Roger · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-20
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
45.5 m
From
397 m
To
442.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept contributes to the overall drill program, but the gold grade is relatively low for a porphyry deposit.

Positive factors

  • New intercept from ongoing drill program

Negative factors

  • Grade is below moderate threshold for gold in porphyry

Evidence · text

“45.5 m grading 1.05 g/t Au from 397.0 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "That estimate deliberately excludes this year's drilling: it gives us a clean, modern base to which the Phase 1 and Phas"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.