Au Gold Announces Results from 20 Holes Drilled at the Ponderosa Gold Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Au Gold Corp
Ticker
AUGC
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-24 23:13:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Au Gold Corp announced drill results from 20 holes at its Ponderosa Gold Project in British Columbia, confirming a shallow epithermal hydrothermal system. While some narrow intervals returned moderate gold grades, the majority of intercepts showed anomalous to weak gold and silver values. The company is consulting an epithermal expert to evaluate the complex mineralization and determine the next phase of exploration, as the Flatiron target yielded no anomalous gold.

Reasoning: The drill program confirmed the presence of a hydrothermal system and returned some anomalous gold and silver values, with a few narrow higher-grade intercepts. However, the overall grades are low for epithermal gold, and the company is seeking expert advice, indicating the results are not as strong as hoped, particularly with no significant results from the Flatiron target.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and signed off by a Qualified Person
  • True width generally estimated for drill intervals
  • Identified structural hydrothermal system
  • Efficient and low-cost drill program execution

Negative factors

  • Generally low gold grades, described as 'anomalous'
  • Complex nature of mineralization requiring expert evaluation
  • Extensive silicification and brecciation appears non-gold bearing
  • No anomalous gold intervals from Flatiron drill holes
  • Higher grades are confined to narrow sub-intervals within broader low-grade zones
  • Cut-off grades for 'including' intervals are not disclosed

Facts used in scoring: 69

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly states that all scientific and technical information has been prepared by a Qualified Person, William Wengzynowski, P. Eng., and details the laboratory (ALS Canada Ltd.) and assay methods (Au-ICP22, ME-MS41).

Evidence · text

“All scientific and technical information in this press release has been prepared by William Wengzynowski, P. Eng., a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101. Mr. Wengzynowski is the Exploration Manager for Au Gold Corp. All samples were submitted to ALS Canada Ltd. in North Vancouver, BC for sample preparation and analysis. Samples were fine crushed to 70% passing 2 millimeters before a 250 gram split was pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns. Pulps were then analyzed for gold by fire assay using the Au-ICP22 technique (Inductively Coupled Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry finish) using a 50 gram charge. Multi-element analyses for 51 elements including gold and silver were determined for all sample pulps using the ME-MS41 procedure which utilizes an ultra-trace aqua regia acid digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy finish.”

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that true widths are interpreted to be 80 to 90% of the reported drill interval for the silica zone intercepts.

Evidence · text

“true widths are interpreted to be 80 to 90% of the reported drill interval”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document reports several 'including' intervals with higher grades, implying a higher cut-off was applied for these sub-intervals, but the specific cut-off grade is not stated.

Evidence · table

“including”

Context: 0.69

Low Gradenegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Many of the reported gold intercepts are below 0.5 g/t, which is considered low for epithermal gold deposits, and the CEO refers to them as 'anomalous gold and silver values'.

Evidence · text

“Broad zones of complex silicification encountered along the Tomahawk trend yielded narrow to moderate intervals of anomalous gold and silver values.”

Narrow High-Grade Zonesneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: While the overall intercepts are generally low grade, several 'including' intervals show gold grades above 1 g/t, but these are over very narrow widths (e.g., 0.69 m at 1.27 g/t Au, 1.00 m at 2.20 g/t Au).

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 0.69

Exploration Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill program 'partially tested two of four epithermal gold targets' and the company is looking to 'determine the next phase of exploration', indicating an early-stage exploration focus.

Evidence · text

“The drill program only partially tested two of four epithermal gold targets identified on the property.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 69. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (69)

PD22-01Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-01
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
22.86 m
To
26.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-01:22.86-26.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.23 g/t over 3.38 m is below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 3.38

PD22-01Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-01
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
22.86 m
To
26.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-01:22.86-26.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.80 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 3.38

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.41 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.41 m
From
18.15 m
To
25.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:18.15-25.56
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.29 g/t over 7.41 m is below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 7.41

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.41 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.41 m
From
18.15 m
To
25.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:18.15-25.56
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.60 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.60”

Context: 7.41

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.27 m
From
31.9 m
To
34.17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:31.90-34.17
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.25 g/t over 2.27 m is below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 2.27

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.27 m
From
31.9 m
To
34.17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:31.90-34.17
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.76 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 2.27

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.69 m
From
22.61 m
To
23.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:22.61-23.30
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.27 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.69 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 0.69

PD22-02Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.69 m
From
22.61 m
To
23.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-02:22.61-23.30
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.92 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 0.69

PD22-03Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.34 m
From
5.7 m
To
10.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-03:5.70-10.67
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.16 g/t over 4.34 m is well below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 4.34

PD22-03Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.34 m
From
5.7 m
To
10.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-03:5.70-10.67
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.62 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 4.34

PD22-03Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.44 m
From
22.4 m
To
23.84 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-03:22.40-23.84
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.49 g/t over 1.44 m is at the higher end of the weak threshold for epithermal gold, but still not highly material.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 1.44

PD22-03Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.44 m
From
22.4 m
To
23.84 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-03:22.40-23.84
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.19 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 1.44

PD22-07Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-07
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
17.1 m
To
19.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-07:17.10-19.20
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.26 g/t over 2.10 m is below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 2.10

PD22-07Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-07
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
17.1 m
To
19.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-07:17.10-19.20
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.96 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.96”

Context: 2.10

PD22-09Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-09
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
14.18 m
To
17.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-09:14.18-17.56
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.23 g/t over 3.38 m is below the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 3.38

PD22-09Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-09
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
14.18 m
To
17.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-09:14.18-17.56
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 3.91 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 3.38

PD22-12Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-12
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.05 m
From
19.86 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-12:19.86-25.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.32 g/t over 6.05 m is at the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating limited materiality.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 6.05

PD22-12Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-12
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.05 m
From
19.86 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-12:19.86-25.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.34 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 6.05

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.91 m
From
25.91 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:25.91-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.44 g/t over 18.91 m is at the higher end of the weak threshold for epithermal gold, but still not highly material.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 18.91

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.91 m
From
25.91 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:25.91-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.88 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 18.91

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.96 m
From
26.91 m
To
27.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:26.91-27.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.01 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.96 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 0.96

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.96 m
From
26.91 m
To
27.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:26.91-27.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.45 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: 0.96

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
43.82 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:43.82-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade of 2.20 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 1.00 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: 1.00

PD22-13Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
43.82 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-13:43.82-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.36 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 1.00

PD22-14Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.72 m
From
18.29 m
To
30.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-14:18.29-30.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.46 g/t over 11.72 m is at the higher end of the weak threshold for epithermal gold, but still not highly material.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 11.72

PD22-14Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.72 m
From
18.29 m
To
30.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-14:18.29-30.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.34 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 11.72

PD22-14Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
22.11 m
To
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-14:22.11-22.86
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.54 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.75 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: 0.75

PD22-14Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
22.11 m
To
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-14:22.11-22.86
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.26 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 0.75

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.52 m
From
30.79 m
To
51.31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:30.79-51.31
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.39 g/t over 20.52 m is at the higher end of the weak threshold for epithermal gold, but still not highly material.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 20.52

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.52 m
From
30.79 m
To
51.31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:30.79-51.31
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.73 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: 20.52

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
33.53 m
To
34.33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:33.53-34.33
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.58 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.80 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.58”

Context: 0.80

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
33.53 m
To
34.33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:33.53-34.33
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 2.51 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: 0.80

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.34 m
From
35.13 m
To
35.47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:35.13-35.47
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.55 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.34 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 0.34

PD22-15Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.34 m
From
35.13 m
To
35.47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-15:35.13-35.47
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.97 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 0.34

PD22-16Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.13 m
From
18.29 m
To
34.42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-16:18.29-34.42
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.35 g/t over 16.13 m is at the weak threshold for epithermal gold, indicating limited materiality.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for epithermal gold

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 16.13

PD22-16Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.13 m
From
18.29 m
To
34.42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-16:18.29-34.42
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.90 g/t is very low and not economically significant.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 16.13

PD22-16Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.97 m
From
18.29 m
To
19.26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-16:18.29-19.26
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.31 g/t is present, but over a very narrow interval of 0.97 m, limiting its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Cut-off grade for sub-interval not disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: 0.97

PD22-16Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.97 m
From
18.29 m
To
19.26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Group ID
PD22-16:18.29-19.26
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.52 g/t is very low and not economically significant, especially over a very narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade
  • Very narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.52”

Context: 0.97

Fact 39Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Canada Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
fire_assay, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, aqua_regia_digestion

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A single surface sample from the T-Bone Zone returned a low gold grade, indicating some prospectivity but requiring further drill testing to confirm significance.

Positive factors

  • Indicates prospectivity in a new target area

Negative factors

  • Single surface sample, not drill results
  • Low grade

Evidence · text

“A composite sample of select material across the zone yielded 0.47 g/t gold.”
PD22-01*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-01*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
22.86 m
To
26.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-01*:22.86-26.24
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: PD22-01*

PD22-01*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-01*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.38 m
From
22.86 m
To
26.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-01*:22.86-26.24
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: PD22-01*

PD22-02*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.41 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.41 m
From
18.15 m
To
25.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-02*:18.15-25.56
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: PD22-02*

PD22-02*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.41 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-02*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.41 m
From
18.15 m
To
25.56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-02*:18.15-25.56
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.60”

Context: PD22-02*

includingPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.69 m
From
22.61 m
To
23.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:22.61-23.3
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: including

includingPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.69 m
From
22.61 m
To
23.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:22.61-23.3
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: including

PD22-03*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.34 m
From
5.7 m
To
10.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-03*:5.7-10.67
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: PD22-03*

PD22-03*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-03*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.34 m
From
5.7 m
To
10.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-03*:5.7-10.67
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: PD22-03*

PD22-12*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-12*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.05 m
From
19.86 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-12*:19.86-25.91
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: PD22-12*

PD22-12*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-12*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.05 m
From
19.86 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-12*:19.86-25.91
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: PD22-12*

PD22-13*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.91 m
From
25.91 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-13*:25.91-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: PD22-13*

PD22-13*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-13*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.91 m
From
25.91 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-13*:25.91-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: PD22-13*

includingPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.96 m
From
26.91 m
To
27.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:26.91-27.87
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: including

includingPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.96 m
From
26.91 m
To
27.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:26.91-27.87
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: including

andPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
43.82 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:43.82-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.2 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: and

andPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
43.82 m
To
44.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:43.82-44.82
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: and

PD22-14*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.72 m
From
18.29 m
To
30.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-14*:18.29-30.01
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: PD22-14*

PD22-14*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-14*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.72 m
From
18.29 m
To
30.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-14*:18.29-30.01
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: PD22-14*

includingPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
22.11 m
To
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:22.11-22.86
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.54 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: including

includingPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
22.11 m
To
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:22.11-22.86
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: including

PD22-15*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.52 m
From
30.79 m
To
51.31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-15*:30.79-51.31
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: PD22-15*

PD22-15*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-15*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.52 m
From
30.79 m
To
51.31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-15*:30.79-51.31
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: PD22-15*

includingPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
33.53 m
To
34.33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:33.53-34.33
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.58 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.58”

Context: including

includingPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
33.53 m
To
34.33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:33.53-34.33
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: including

andPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.34 m
From
35.13 m
To
35.47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:35.13-35.47
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.55 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: and

andPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.34 m
From
35.13 m
To
35.47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:35.13-35.47
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.97 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: and

PD22-16*Ponderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.13 m
From
18.29 m
To
34.42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-16*:18.29-34.42
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: PD22-16*

PD22-16*Ponderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD22-16*
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.13 m
From
18.29 m
To
34.42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD22-16*:18.29-34.42
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: PD22-16*

includingPonderosa Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.97 m
From
18.29 m
To
19.26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:18.29-19.26
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.31 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: including

includingPonderosa Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ponderosa Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
AUGC

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.97 m
From
18.29 m
To
19.26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:18.29-19.26
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-08-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.52”

Context: including

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.