Aton Reports New Results From Metallurgical Testing on Abu Marawat Oxide, Transition and Sulphide Mineralisation

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aton Mining Inc.
Ticker
AAN
Exchange
TSX
Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Zinc, Lead
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-08-24 07:37:46 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aton Mining Inc. announced encouraging preliminary metallurgical testwork results from its Abu Marawat deposit, covering oxide, transitional, and sulphide mineralisation. The study identified several potential processing routes, including conventional cyanide leaching for gold, flotation for copper and zinc concentrates with precious metal credits, and a flotation-leach flowsheet for improved overall metal extraction. The testwork also demonstrated the effectiveness of SART for cyanide recovery and base metal removal, despite challenges with zinc depression in some transitional ore types.

Reasoning: Aton Mining reported encouraging preliminary metallurgical testwork results for its Abu Marawat project, identifying viable processing routes for gold, silver, copper, and zinc across various ore types. While high recoveries were achieved for gold leaching and SART precipitation, challenges such as high reagent consumption, recovery losses in cleaner stages, and zinc depression were noted. The testwork is a significant step towards defining the project's economic viability and will inform the upcoming mineral resource estimate update.

Positive factors

  • High gold recoveries achieved through whole ore cyanide leaching (up to 90.7%) and flotation tails leaching (up to 86.6%).
  • High value copper concentrates with significant silver credits are achievable through flotation.
  • A combined flotation-leach flowsheet offers improved overall metal extraction for gold (76.2%) and silver (70.5%).
  • SART testwork demonstrated high precipitation rates for copper (99.8%), silver (99.9%), and zinc (98.4%), indicating effective cyanide regeneration and base metal removal.
  • Metallurgical testwork covered multiple mineralisation types (oxide, transitional, sulphide) and domains (Fin Vein, CVZ, JVZ).

Negative factors

  • Whole ore cyanide leaching showed high reagent consumptions (up to 9.2 kg/t NaCN and 12.0 kg/t Lime).
  • Significant recovery losses (often 10-40%) were observed in cleaner stages for copper flotation, impacting overall concentrate recovery.
  • Zinc depression proved challenging in transitional ore types, leading to zinc misreporting to copper concentrates and potential smelter penalties.
  • Gold extraction in the SART circuit was limited (~62%) due to reduction to elemental gold and co-precipitation.
  • Comminution testwork indicated that the mineralisation types are moderately hard to hard for crushing and milling.
  • The testwork is described as 'preliminary', suggesting further optimization and larger-scale tests are needed.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 162

Atlas analysis — Aton Mining Inc.: Aton Reports New Results From Metallurgical Testing on Abu Marawat Oxide, Transition and Sulphide Mineralisation. 85.5% recovery; 48.3% recovery; 19.5% recovery

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 162. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (162)

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 85.5 %Head Grade: 11.5Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET01 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
85.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
11.5
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.4 kg/t
Lime
3.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold recovery of 85.5% from Fin Vein oxide material is positive, but accompanied by high cyanide consumption of 4.4 kg/t.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery for oxide material.

Negative factors

  • High cyanide consumption.

Evidence · table

“85.5”

Context: AM-MET01-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 48.3 %Head Grade: 184Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET01 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
48.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
184
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.4 kg/t
Lime
3.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver recovery of 48.3% is moderate, indicating variability in silver amenability to cyanide leaching.

Negative factors

  • Moderate silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“48.3”

Context: AM-MET01-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 19.5 %Head Grade: 0.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET01 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
19.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.63
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.4 kg/t
Lime
3.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 19.5% in cyanide leaching is expected for copper-bearing gold mineralisation, but highlights the need for alternative processing for copper.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“19.5”

Context: AM-MET01-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 1.5 %Head Grade: 5.8Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET01 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
1.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
5.8
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.4 kg/t
Lime
3.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 1.5% in cyanide leaching indicates it is not an effective method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: AM-MET01-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 69.8 %Head Grade: 15.1Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET02 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
69.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
15.1
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
9.2 kg/t
Lime
2.4 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold recovery of 69.8% is moderate, and the very high cyanide consumption of 9.2 kg/t is a significant negative factor for this sample.

Negative factors

  • High cyanide consumption.
  • Moderate gold recovery.

Evidence · table

“69.8”

Context: AM-MET02-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 62.2 %Head Grade: 104Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET02 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
62.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
104
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
9.2 kg/t
Lime
2.4 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver recovery of 62.2% is moderate, but the high cyanide consumption is a concern.

Negative factors

  • Moderate silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“62.2”

Context: AM-MET02-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 22 %Head Grade: 1.82Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET02 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
22 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.82
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
9.2 kg/t
Lime
2.4 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 22.0% in cyanide leaching is expected, reinforcing the need for alternative copper processing.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“22.0”

Context: AM-MET02-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0 %Head Grade: 0.83Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET02 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
0 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.83
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
9.2 kg/t
Lime
2.4 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: No zinc recovery (0.0%) in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • No zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: AM-MET02-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 79.2 %Head Grade: 1.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
79.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
0.9 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 79.2% from transitional material with moderate cyanide consumption and low lime consumption is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery.
  • Lower lime consumption.

Negative factors

  • Moderate cyanide consumption.

Evidence · table

“79.2”

Context: AM-MET03-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 66.7 %Head Grade: 42Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
66.7 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
42
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
0.9 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 66.7% from transitional material is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“66.7”

Context: AM-MET03-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 26 %Head Grade: 0.38Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
26 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.38
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
0.9 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 26.0% in cyanide leaching is expected, indicating it's not the primary method for copper.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“26.0”

Context: AM-MET03-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.8 %Head Grade: 1.56Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
0.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.56
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
0.9 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 0.8% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: AM-MET03-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 82.3 %Head Grade: 3.9Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
82.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.9
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
0.6 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 82.3% from Fin Vein transitional material with low cyanide and lime consumption is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery.
  • Low reagent consumption.

Evidence · table

“82.3”

Context: AM-MET04-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 64.4 %Head Grade: 152Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
64.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
152
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
0.6 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 64.4% from transitional material is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“64.4”

Context: AM-MET04-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 15 %Head Grade: 0.35Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
15 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.35
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
0.6 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 15.0% in cyanide leaching is expected, indicating it's not the primary method for copper.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“15.0”

Context: AM-MET04-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.2 %Head Grade: 3.99Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
0.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.99
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
0.6 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 0.2% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: AM-MET04-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 82.5 %Head Grade: 5.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
82.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
5.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
1.8 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 82.5% from Fin Vein oxide material is positive, with moderate reagent consumption.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery.

Negative factors

  • Moderate cyanide consumption.

Evidence · table

“82.5”

Context: AM-MET05-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 42 %Head Grade: 96.9Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
42 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
96.9
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
1.8 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low silver recovery of 42.0% is a negative, indicating challenges with silver extraction via cyanide leaching for this sample.

Negative factors

  • Low silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“42.0”

Context: AM-MET05-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 18 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
18 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
1.8 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 18.0% in cyanide leaching is expected, reinforcing the need for alternative copper processing.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“18.0”

Context: AM-MET05-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.5 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
0.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.6 kg/t
Lime
1.8 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 0.5% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: AM-MET05-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 83.5 %Head Grade: 2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
83.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
2
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
8.1 kg/t
Lime
12 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 83.5% is positive, but very high cyanide (8.1 kg/t) and lime (12.0 kg/t) consumption are significant negative factors.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery.

Negative factors

  • High cyanide consumption.
  • Very high lime consumption.

Evidence · table

“83.5”

Context: AM-MET06-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 61.2 %Head Grade: 34.7Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
61.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
34.7
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
8.1 kg/t
Lime
12 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver recovery of 61.2% is achieved, but the very high reagent consumption is a concern.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver recovery.

Negative factors

  • Very high reagent consumption.

Evidence · table

“61.2”

Context: AM-MET06-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 12.2 %Head Grade: 1.08Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
12.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.08
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
8.1 kg/t
Lime
12 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 12.2% in cyanide leaching is expected, reinforcing the need for alternative copper processing.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“12.2”

Context: AM-MET06-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 1.5 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
1.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
8.1 kg/t
Lime
12 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 1.5% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: AM-MET06-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 75.5 %Head Grade: 2.8Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
75.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
2.8
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
6.2 kg/t
Lime
2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 75.5% is positive, but high cyanide consumption of 6.2 kg/t is a negative factor.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery.

Negative factors

  • High cyanide consumption.

Evidence · table

“75.5”

Context: AM-MET07-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 51.6 %Head Grade: 36.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
51.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
36.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
6.2 kg/t
Lime
2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver recovery of 51.6% is achieved, but the high cyanide consumption is a concern.

Negative factors

  • Moderate silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“51.6”

Context: AM-MET07-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 30.8 %Head Grade: 0.52Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
30.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.52
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
6.2 kg/t
Lime
2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 30.8% in cyanide leaching is expected, reinforcing the need for alternative copper processing.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“30.8”

Context: AM-MET07-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.1 %Head Grade: 1.81Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
0.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.81
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
6.2 kg/t
Lime
2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 0.1% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: AM-MET07-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 89.2 %Head Grade: 3.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
89.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.1 kg/t
Lime
1.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold recovery of 89.2% from JVZ oxide material with moderate reagent consumption is very positive.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery.
  • Moderate reagent consumption.

Evidence · table

“89.2”

Context: AM-MET08-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 62.6 %Head Grade: 50.5Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
62.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
50.5
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.1 kg/t
Lime
1.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 62.6% from JVZ oxide material is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“62.6”

Context: AM-MET08-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 45.3 %Head Grade: 0.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
45.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.2
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.1 kg/t
Lime
1.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper recovery of 45.3% in cyanide leaching is noted, but still not the primary method for copper.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper recovery.

Evidence · table

“45.3”

Context: AM-MET08-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 4.2 %Head Grade: 0.54Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
4.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.54
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
4.1 kg/t
Lime
1.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 4.2% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: AM-MET08-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 90.7 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET09 CVZ sulphide

Recovery

Recovery
90.7 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
3.2 kg/t
Lime
1.3 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold recovery of 90.7% from CVZ sulphide material with low cyanide consumption is excellent and very positive.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery.
  • Low cyanide consumption.

Evidence · table

“90.7”

Context: AM-MET09-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 88.4 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET09 CVZ sulphide

Recovery

Recovery
88.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
3.2 kg/t
Lime
1.3 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high silver recovery of 88.4% from CVZ sulphide material is excellent and very positive.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver recovery.

Evidence · table

“88.4”

Context: AM-MET09-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 3.4 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET09 CVZ sulphide

Recovery

Recovery
3.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
3.2 kg/t
Lime
1.3 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 3.4% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for copper extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: AM-MET09-LT1

kinetic cyanide leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.4 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
kinetic cyanide leach test
Processing Route
whole ore cyanide leaching
Sample
AM-MET09 CVZ sulphide

Recovery

Recovery
0.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Cyanide
3.2 kg/t
Lime
1.3 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 0.4% in cyanide leaching confirms it is not a viable method for zinc extraction.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery in cyanide leach.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: AM-MET09-LT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 65.8 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
65.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
4.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.13 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 65.8% to rougher concentrate is positive, but the concentrate grade of 4.9% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“65.8”

Context: AM-MET05

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 59.7 %Head Grade: 5.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
59.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
5.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
52
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
6.13 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 59.7% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 52.0 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“59.7”

Context: AM-MET05

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 66.5 %Head Grade: 96.9Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
66.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
96.9
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
1038
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
6.13 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 66.5% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 1,038 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“66.5”

Context: AM-MET05

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 17.7 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
17.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
11.3
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.13 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 17.7% to copper rougher concentrate is negative, and the high zinc grade of 11.3% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting and potential penalties.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: AM-MET05

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 52.8 %Head Grade: 0.04Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
52.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.04
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.8
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.13 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 52.8% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“52.8”

Context: AM-MET05

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 69.9 %Head Grade: 1.08Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
69.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.08
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
8
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.17 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 69.9% to rougher concentrate with a reasonable concentrate grade of 8.0% Cu is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“69.9”

Context: AM-MET06

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 43.1 %Head Grade: 2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
43.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
9.3
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.17 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate gold recovery of 43.1% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Moderate gold recovery.

Evidence · table

“43.1”

Context: AM-MET06

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 53.4 %Head Grade: 34.7Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
53.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
34.7
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
188.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.17 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver recovery of 53.4% to rougher concentrate with a good concentrate grade of 188.8 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver recovery.
  • Good silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“53.4”

Context: AM-MET06

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 22.6 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
22.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.1
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.17 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 22.6% to copper rougher concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“22.6”

Context: AM-MET06

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 31.5 %Head Grade: 0.06Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
31.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.06
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.17 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur recovery of 31.5% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Evidence · table

“31.5”

Context: AM-MET06

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 56.1 %Head Grade: 0.52Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
56.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.52
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
5.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.77 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper recovery of 56.1% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“56.1”

Context: AM-MET07

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 59.4 %Head Grade: 2.8Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
59.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
2.8
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
38.1
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
4.77 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 59.4% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 38.1 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“59.4”

Context: AM-MET07

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 59.8 %Head Grade: 36.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
59.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
36.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
519.7
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
4.77 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 59.8% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 519.7 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“59.8”

Context: AM-MET07

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 8.2 %Head Grade: 1.81Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
8.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.81
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
3
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.77 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 8.2% to copper rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“8.2”

Context: AM-MET07

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 38.8 %Head Grade: 0.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
38.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.8
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.77 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur recovery of 38.8% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Evidence · table

“38.8”

Context: AM-MET07

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 48.4 %Head Grade: 0.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
48.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.2
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
2.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.92 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper recovery of 48.4% to rougher concentrate is noted, but the concentrate grade of 2.4% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“48.4”

Context: AM-MET08

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 39.3 %Head Grade: 3.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
39.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
3.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
32.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
3.92 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate gold recovery of 39.3% to rougher concentrate is noted, despite a high concentrate grade of 32.8 g/t Au.

Positive factors

  • High gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Moderate gold recovery.

Evidence · table

“39.3”

Context: AM-MET08

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 62.5 %Head Grade: 50.5Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
62.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
50.5
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
716.9
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
3.92 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 62.5% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 716.9 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“62.5”

Context: AM-MET08

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 12 %Head Grade: 0.54Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
12 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.54
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.92 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 12.0% to copper rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“12.0”

Context: AM-MET08

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 44.4 %Head Grade: 0.08Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
44.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.08
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.3
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.92 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 44.4% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Evidence · table

“44.4”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 37.8 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
37.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
17.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.99 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper concentrate grade of 17.6% Cu is achieved, but at the cost of significant recovery loss to 37.8%.

Positive factors

  • Good copper concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“37.8”

Context: AM-MET05

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 29.5 %Head Grade: 5.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
29.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
5.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
159
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.99 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 159 g/t Au is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 29.5%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“29.5”

Context: AM-MET05

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 37.7 %Head Grade: 96.9Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
37.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
96.9
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
3647
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.99 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 3,647 g/t Ag is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 37.7%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“37.7”

Context: AM-MET05

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 3.9 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
3.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
15.7
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.99 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 3.9% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative, and the high zinc grade of 15.7% in the copper concentrate will attract smelter penalties.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate leading to penalties.

Evidence · table

“3.9”

Context: AM-MET05

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 20.3 %Head Grade: 0.04Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide

Recovery

Recovery
20.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.04
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.99 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low sulfur recovery of 20.3% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“20.3”

Context: AM-MET05

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 62.6 %Head Grade: 1.08Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
62.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.08
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
24.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.69 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 62.6% to cleaner concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 24.4% Cu is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • High copper concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“62.6”

Context: AM-MET06

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 31.5 %Head Grade: 2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
31.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
23.2
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
2.69 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold concentrate grade of 23.2 g/t Au is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 31.5%.

Positive factors

  • High gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“31.5”

Context: AM-MET06

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 44.3 %Head Grade: 34.7Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
44.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
34.7
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
534.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
2.69 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high silver concentrate grade of 534.6 g/t Ag is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 44.3%.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“44.3”

Context: AM-MET06

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 8.6 %Head Grade: 0.46Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
8.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.46
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.69 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 8.6% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: AM-MET06

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 17.9 %Head Grade: 0.06Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET06 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
17.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.06
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.69 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low sulfur recovery of 17.9% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“17.9”

Context: AM-MET06

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 35.7 %Head Grade: 0.52Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
35.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.52
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
22.8
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.78 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High copper concentrate grade of 22.8% Cu is achieved, but at the cost of significant recovery loss to 35.7%.

Positive factors

  • High copper concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“35.7”

Context: AM-MET07

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 35.5 %Head Grade: 2.8Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
35.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
2.8
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
139
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.78 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 139 g/t Au is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 35.5%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“35.5”

Context: AM-MET07

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 35.3 %Head Grade: 36.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
35.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
36.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
1868
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.78 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 1,868 g/t Ag is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 35.3%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“35.3”

Context: AM-MET07

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 2.5 %Head Grade: 1.81Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
2.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.81
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
5.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.78 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 2.5% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: AM-MET07

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 14.7 %Head Grade: 0.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET07 CVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
14.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.78 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low sulfur recovery of 14.7% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“14.7”

Context: AM-MET07

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 30.9 %Head Grade: 0.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
30.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.2
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
13.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.43 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper concentrate grade of 13.9% Cu is achieved, but at the cost of significant recovery loss to 30.9%.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“30.9”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 13.1 %Head Grade: 3.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
13.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
3.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
101
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.43 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 101 g/t Au is achieved, but with very low recovery of 13.1%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“13.1”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 32.3 %Head Grade: 50.5Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
32.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
50.5
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
3410
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.43 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 3,410 g/t Ag is achieved, but with a significant recovery loss to 32.3%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“32.3”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 2.8 %Head Grade: 0.54Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
2.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.54
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
3.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.43 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 2.8% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 27.8 %Head Grade: 0.08Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET08 JVZ oxide

Recovery

Recovery
27.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.08
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
7.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.43 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low sulfur recovery of 27.8% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“27.8”

Context: AM-MET08

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 38.8 %Head Grade: 0.38Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
38.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.38
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
9.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper recovery of 38.8% to cleaner concentrate is noted, but the concentrate grade of 9.9% Cu is low and recovery is significantly reduced.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.
  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“38.8”

Context: AM-MET03

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 23.2 %Head Grade: 1.6Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
23.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.6
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
28.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
1.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold concentrate grade of 28.6 g/t Au is achieved, but with very low recovery of 23.2%.

Positive factors

  • High gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“23.2”

Context: AM-MET03

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 25.1 %Head Grade: 42Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
25.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
42
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
799.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
1.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high silver concentrate grade of 799.6 g/t Ag is achieved, but with very low recovery of 25.1%.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“25.1”

Context: AM-MET03

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 38.4 %Head Grade: 1.56Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
38.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
1.56
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
44.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High zinc concentrate grade of 44.6% Zn is achieved, but with moderate recovery of 38.4% to the copper cleaner concentrate, indicating misreporting.

Positive factors

  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Moderate zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“38.4”

Context: AM-MET03

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 18 %Head Grade: 2.51Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET03 CVZ transitional

Recovery

Recovery
18 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
2.51
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
33.3
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low sulfur recovery of 18.0% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“18.0”

Context: AM-MET03

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 77.2 %Head Grade: 0.35Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
77.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.35
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
7.5
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 77.2% to cleaner concentrate is positive, but the concentrate grade of 7.5% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“77.2”

Context: AM-MET04

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 54 %Head Grade: 3.9Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
54 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
3.9
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
65.5
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
3.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 54.0% to cleaner concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 65.5 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“54.0”

Context: AM-MET04

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 54.2 %Head Grade: 152Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
54.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
152
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
2393
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
3.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 54.2% to cleaner concentrate with an exceptional concentrate grade of 2,393 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“54.2”

Context: AM-MET04

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 35.1 %Head Grade: 3.99Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
35.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
3.99
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
38.8
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High zinc concentrate grade of 38.8% Zn is achieved, but with moderate recovery of 35.1% to the copper cleaner concentrate, indicating misreporting.

Positive factors

  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Moderate zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“35.1”

Context: AM-MET04

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 38.8 %Head Grade: 3.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
AM-MET04 Fin Vein transitional

Recovery

Recovery
38.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
3.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
34.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
3.4 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 38.8% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“38.8”

Context: AM-MET04

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 91.9 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
91.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
2.01
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high copper recovery of 91.9% to rougher concentrate is excellent, but the concentrate grade of 2.01% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Very high copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“91.9”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 70 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
70 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
16
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 70.0% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 16.0 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“70.0”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 72 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
72 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
386.4
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 72.0% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 386.4 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“72.0”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 32.9 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
32.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
7.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate zinc recovery of 32.9% to copper rougher concentrate is noted, but the high zinc grade of 7.6% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Moderate zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“32.9”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 84.7 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
84.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.69
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High lead recovery of 84.7% to copper rougher concentrate is positive.

Positive factors

  • High lead recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“84.7”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 52.7 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
52.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
11.7
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
19.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 52.7% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“52.7”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 2.4 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
2.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.16
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 2.4% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 11.8 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
11.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
8.5
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low gold recovery of 11.8% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“11.8”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 11.6 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
11.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
194.7
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low silver recovery of 11.6% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, despite a good concentrate grade of 194.7 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Good silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“11.6”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 62.7 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
62.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
45.5
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc recovery of 62.7% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 45.5% Zn is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“62.7”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 2.5 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
2.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.06
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low lead recovery of 2.5% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low lead recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 36.8 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT1 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
36.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
25.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
6.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 36.8% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“36.8”

Context: FT1

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 89.7 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
89.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
3.44
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high copper recovery of 89.7% to rougher concentrate is excellent, but the concentrate grade of 3.44% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Very high copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“89.7”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 65.4 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
65.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
26.3
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 65.4% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 26.3 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“65.4”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 67.5 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
67.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
613.2
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 67.5% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 613.2 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“67.5”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 29 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
29 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
12
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate zinc recovery of 29.0% to copper rougher concentrate is noted, but the high zinc grade of 12.0% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Moderate zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“29.0”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 76.5 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
76.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.1
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good lead recovery of 76.5% to copper rougher concentrate is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good lead recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“76.5”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 49.2 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
49.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
18.5
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
11.1 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 49.2% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“49.2”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 4.1 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
4.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.21
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 4.1% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“4.1”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 16.4 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
16.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
8.9
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low gold recovery of 16.4% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“16.4”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 15.8 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
15.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
192.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low silver recovery of 15.8% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, despite a good concentrate grade of 192.6 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Good silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“15.8”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 66.2 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
66.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
36.7
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc recovery of 66.2% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 36.7% Zn is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“66.2”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 6 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.12
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low lead recovery of 6.0% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low lead recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 44.6 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT2 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
44.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
22.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 44.6% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“44.6”

Context: FT2

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 89.2 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
89.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
4.27
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high copper recovery of 89.2% to rougher concentrate is excellent, but the concentrate grade of 4.27% Cu is low.

Positive factors

  • Very high copper recovery to rougher concentrate.

Negative factors

  • Low concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“89.2”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 62.4 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
62.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
29.2
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 62.4% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 29.2 g/t Au is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High gold concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“62.4”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 66 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
66 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
665.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 66.0% to rougher concentrate with a very high concentrate grade of 665.8 g/t Ag is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“66.0”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 23.5 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
23.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
11.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low zinc recovery of 23.5% to copper rougher concentrate is noted, but the high zinc grade of 11.6% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“23.5”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 75.5 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
75.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
1.23
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good lead recovery of 75.5% to copper rougher concentrate is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good lead recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“75.5”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 39.8 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
39.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
17.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9.6 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 39.8% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“39.8”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 3.6 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
3.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 3.6% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 15.9 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
15.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
8.7
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low gold recovery of 15.9% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“15.9”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 15.9 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
15.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
188.1
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low silver recovery of 15.9% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, despite a good concentrate grade of 188.1 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Good silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“15.9”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 70.3 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
70.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
40.5
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc recovery of 70.3% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 40.5% Zn is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“70.3”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 5.5 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
5.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.1
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low lead recovery of 5.5% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low lead recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“5.5”

Context: FT3

rougher kinetic flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 43.5 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
rougher kinetic flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
FT3 Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
43.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
22
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
8.3 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 43.5% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“43.5”

Context: FT3

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 48.3 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
48.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
23.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High copper concentrate grade of 23.6% Cu is achieved, but at the cost of significant recovery loss to 48.3%.

Positive factors

  • High copper concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Significant recovery loss in cleaner stage.

Evidence · table

“48.3”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 12.8 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
12.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
67
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 67.0 g/t Au is achieved, but with very low recovery of 12.8%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“12.8”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 14.3 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
14.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
1663
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 1,663 g/t Ag is achieved, but with very low recovery of 14.3%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“14.3”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 0.9 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
0.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
5.05
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely low zinc recovery of 0.9% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative, and the high zinc grade of 5.05% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Extremely low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“0.9”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 6.3 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
6.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
30.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely low sulfur recovery of 6.3% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Extremely low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 30.7 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl2 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
30.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
5.34
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
0.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate lead recovery of 30.7% to copper cleaner concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lead recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“30.7”

Context: CuCl2 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 65.2 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
65.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
14.6
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 65.2% to cleaner concentrate with a good concentrate grade of 14.6% Cu is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • Good copper concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“65.2”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 23.3 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
23.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
55.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 55.8 g/t Au is achieved, but with very low recovery of 23.3%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“23.3”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 25.3 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
25.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
1338
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 1,338 g/t Ag is achieved, but with very low recovery of 25.3%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“25.3”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 3.3 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
3.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
8.38
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 3.3% to copper cleaner concentrate is negative, and the high zinc grade of 8.38% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“3.3”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 10.5 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
10.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
23.1
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low sulfur recovery of 10.5% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Very low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“10.5”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 42.2 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

Recovery

Recovery
42.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
3.35
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
1.8 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate lead recovery of 42.2% to copper cleaner concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lead recovery to copper cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“42.2”

Context: CuCl1 Conc + Scav Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 66.7 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
66.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
12
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 66.7% to rougher concentrate with a good concentrate grade of 12.0% Cu is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good copper recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • Good copper concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“66.7”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 25.9 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
25.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
49.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high gold concentrate grade of 49.6 g/t Au is achieved, but with very low recovery of 25.9%.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“25.9”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 27.8 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
27.8 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
1182
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver concentrate grade of 1,182 g/t Ag is achieved, but with very low recovery of 27.8%.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“27.8”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 4.4 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
4.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc recovery of 4.4% to copper rougher concentrate is negative, and the high zinc grade of 9.0% in the copper concentrate indicates misreporting.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc recovery to copper rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc grade in copper concentrate.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 11.9 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
11.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
20.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low sulfur recovery of 11.9% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Negative factors

  • Very low sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“11.9”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 44.4 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Cu Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
44.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
2.83
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
2.2 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate lead recovery of 44.4% to copper rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lead recovery to copper rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“44.4”

Context: Cu Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 4.3 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
4.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.36
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 4.3% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 14.6 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
14.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
13.2
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low gold recovery of 14.6% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, despite a good concentrate grade of 13.2 g/t Au.

Positive factors

  • Good gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“14.6”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 16.3 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
16.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
326.6
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low silver recovery of 16.3% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, despite a very high concentrate grade of 326.6 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“16.3”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 64.2 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
64.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
62.3
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc recovery of 64.2% to cleaner concentrate with an exceptional concentrate grade of 62.3% Zn is very positive.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • Exceptional zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“64.2”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 37.2 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
37.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
30.9
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 37.2% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“37.2”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 6.6 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Conc

Recovery

Recovery
6.6 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
4.7 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low lead recovery of 6.6% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Very low lead recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“6.6”

Context: ZnCl1 Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 6.1 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
6.1 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.44
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low copper recovery of 6.1% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Very low copper recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“6.1”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 17.7 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
17.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
13.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low gold recovery of 17.7% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, despite a good concentrate grade of 13.8 g/t Au.

Positive factors

  • Good gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 19.9 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
19.9 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
343.2
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low silver recovery of 19.9% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative, despite a very high concentrate grade of 343.2 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“19.9”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 72.3 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
72.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
60.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high zinc recovery of 72.3% to cleaner concentrate with an exceptional concentrate grade of 60.4% Zn is very positive.

Positive factors

  • Very high zinc recovery to cleaner concentrate.
  • Exceptional zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“72.3”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 42.3 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
42.3 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
30.2
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 42.3% to cleaner concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“42.3”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 9.2 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
ZnCl1 Combined

Recovery

Recovery
9.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.49
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
5.5 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low lead recovery of 9.2% to zinc cleaner concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Low lead recovery to zinc cleaner concentrate.

Evidence · table

“9.2”

Context: ZnCl1 Combined

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 15.7 %Head Grade: 0.41Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
15.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.41
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.7
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper recovery of 15.7% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative, indicating poor selectivity.

Negative factors

  • Low copper recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“15.7”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 31.2 %Head Grade: 4.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
31.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
14.8
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate gold recovery of 31.2% to zinc rougher concentrate is noted, despite a good concentrate grade of 14.8 g/t Au.

Positive factors

  • Good gold concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Moderate gold recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“31.2”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 33.5 %Head Grade: 102Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
33.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
102
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
351.3
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver recovery of 33.5% to zinc rougher concentrate is noted, despite a very high concentrate grade of 351.3 g/t Ag.

Positive factors

  • Very high silver concentrate grade.

Negative factors

  • Moderate silver recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“33.5”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 83.5 %Head Grade: 4.63Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
83.5 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.63
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
42.4
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high zinc recovery of 83.5% to rougher concentrate with a high concentrate grade of 42.4% Zn is very positive.

Positive factors

  • Very high zinc recovery to rougher concentrate.
  • High zinc concentrate grade.

Evidence · table

“83.5”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · sulfurRecovery: 52.2 %Head Grade: 4.05Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
sulfur
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
52.2 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
4.05
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
22.7
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate sulfur recovery of 52.2% to rougher concentrate is noted.

Positive factors

  • Moderate sulfur recovery.

Evidence · table

“52.2”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

open cycle cleaner flotationAbu Marawat · leadRecovery: 20.7 %Head Grade: 0.16Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
lead
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
open cycle cleaner flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
Zn Ro Conc

Recovery

Recovery
20.7 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Head Grade
0.16
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
0.33
Conc. Grade Unit
%
Mass Pull
9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low lead recovery of 20.7% to zinc rougher concentrate is negative.

Negative factors

  • Low lead recovery to zinc rougher concentrate.

Evidence · table

“20.7”

Context: Zn Ro Conc

cyanidation leach testAbu Marawat · goldRecovery: 76.5 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanidation leach test
Processing Route
flotation tails leach
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide FCT final tails

Recovery

Recovery
76.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
1.5 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold extraction of 76.5% from flotation tails indicates potential for incremental recovery.

Positive factors

  • Good gold extraction from flotation tails.

Evidence · table

“76.5”

Context: AM-MET05

cyanidation leach testAbu Marawat · silverRecovery: 36.8 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
silver
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanidation leach test
Processing Route
flotation tails leach
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide FCT final tails

Recovery

Recovery
36.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
1.5 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low silver extraction of 36.8% from flotation tails is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low silver extraction from flotation tails.

Evidence · table

“36.8”

Context: AM-MET05

cyanidation leach testAbu Marawat · copperRecovery: 20.6 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
copper
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanidation leach test
Processing Route
flotation tails leach
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide FCT final tails

Recovery

Recovery
20.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
1.5 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low copper dissolution of 20.6% from flotation tails is noted.

Negative factors

  • Low copper dissolution from flotation tails.

Evidence · table

“20.6”

Context: AM-MET05

cyanidation leach testAbu Marawat · zincRecovery: 3.3 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Abu Marawat
Commodity
zinc
Region
eastern desert of egypt
Reported Region
Eastern Desert of Egypt
Ticker
AAN

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanidation leach test
Processing Route
flotation tails leach
Sample
AM-MET05 Fin Vein oxide FCT final tails

Recovery

Recovery
3.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Reagents

Cyanide
3.6 kg/t
Lime
1.5 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SLR Consulting

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low zinc dissolution of 3.3% from flotation tails is noted.

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc dissolution from flotation tails.

Evidence · table

“3.3”

Context: AM-MET05

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.