ATEX Extends Strike Length of High-Grade B2B Breccia to 600m and Expands the Broader B2B Mineralized Corridor by 200m East

Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant extension of the B2B breccia to the south with a strong CuEq grade and substantial length, indicating good continuity. The pending Ag and Mo assays and unknown true width introduce minor uncertainty.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a broader extension of the B2B breccia, contributing to the overall CuEq grade. The grade is moderate for a porphyry gold component. Pending assays and unknown true width are minor caveats.

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within ATXD19A confirms the presence of stronger mineralization within the southern extension of the B2B breccia, with a very strong CuEq grade for a porphyry deposit. Pending assays and unknown true width are minor caveats.

Reasoning: This gold intercept contributes to the high-grade sub-interval in ATXD19A, with a good grade for a porphyry gold component. Pending assays and unknown true width are minor caveats.

Reasoning: This very long intercept in ATXD25D extends the B2B Zone to the north with a strong CuEq grade, demonstrating significant scale and continuity. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a very long interval extending mineralization to the north. The gold grade is moderate for a porphyry system, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This silver intercept is part of a very long interval extending mineralization to the north. The silver grade is low but contributes to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This molybdenum intercept is part of a very long interval extending mineralization to the north, contributing to the overall CuEq. The grade is moderate for a porphyry system. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This long, higher-grade sub-interval within ATXD25D further confirms the northern extension of the B2B Zone with a strong CuEq grade, indicating good continuity. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a long, higher-grade sub-interval extending mineralization to the north. The gold grade is moderate for a porphyry system, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This silver intercept is part of a long, higher-grade sub-interval extending mineralization to the north. The silver grade is low but contributes to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This molybdenum intercept is part of a long, higher-grade sub-interval extending mineralization to the north, with a good grade for a porphyry system. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This exceptionally long intercept in ATXD26C confirms the scale and continuity of porphyry mineralization at the B2B elevation horizon with a strong CuEq grade. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of an exceptionally long interval confirming porphyry mineralization continuity. The gold grade is at the weak end for a porphyry system, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This silver intercept is part of an exceptionally long interval confirming porphyry mineralization continuity. The silver grade is low but contributes to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This molybdenum intercept is part of an exceptionally long interval confirming porphyry mineralization continuity, with a good grade for a porphyry system. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This long, high-grade sub-interval within ATXD26C shows exceptional CuEq grade for a porphyry, further confirming the continuity of mineralization. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a long, high-grade sub-interval, with a good grade for a porphyry gold component, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This silver intercept is part of a long, high-grade sub-interval, contributing to the overall CuEq. The silver grade is low. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This molybdenum intercept is part of a long, high-grade sub-interval, with a good grade for a porphyry system, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This additional high-grade sub-interval within ATXD26C further confirms the continuity of porphyry mineralization with a strong CuEq grade. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of an additional sub-interval, with a good grade for a porphyry gold component, contributing to the overall CuEq. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: This silver intercept is part of an additional sub-interval, contributing to the overall CuEq. The silver grade is low. The unknown true width is a minor caveat.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 44.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 110.9 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 117.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 30.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 191.8 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 138.2 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 114.2 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 180.5 %·m is strong.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 52.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 306.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 138.1 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 66.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is weak.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 112.0 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53.7 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.99 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.0 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.5 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 168.0 %·m is strong.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 400.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 67.1 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 88.4 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.1 g/t mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.