AT4: Antimony and Silver Results Support Mine-to-Metal Strategy

Original announcement by asx on

Company
AMERICAN TUNGSTEN & ANTIMONY LTD
Ticker
AT4
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Antimony
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-14 22:37:46 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

American Tungsten & Antimony Ltd (AT4) announced high-grade antimony drill results from its Antimony Canyon Project in Utah and bonanza silver rock chip results from the White Spar Project in Arizona. The drilling at Little Emma confirmed a second high-grade antimony pod, including an intercept of 0.36m at 68.1% Sb. The company also reported silver grades up to 665 g/t Ag from White Spar rock chip samples, prompting an assessment for a dedicated silver recovery circuit at its Del Sol Refinery, which previously produced 99.8% pure antimony ingot.

Reasoning: The announcement reports very high-grade antimony drill results and bonanza silver rock chip results, which significantly strengthen the company's mine-to-metal strategy and open new revenue potential. While drilling QA/QC is good, rock chip sampling has limitations and true widths are not confirmed, and deleterious elements are present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept (68.1% Sb)
  • Bonanza silver grades (665 g/t Ag)
  • Confirmation of mine-to-metal strategy viability
  • Potential for new silver revenue stream
  • QA/QC disclosed for drilling
  • Compositing parameters disclosed for drilling
  • Step-out drilling extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True widths not confirmed for drill intercepts
  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations for rock chip samples (no company CRMs/blanks/duplicates, unmeasured sampling precision)
  • Deleterious elements (As, Hg, Tl, Mo, Pb, Ba, Sr, Cd) present in both projects
  • Metallurgical results are historical, not new testwork

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 26

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 0.36m at 68.1% Sb is exceptionally high-grade for antimony.

Evidence · table

“0.36m @ 68.10% Sb”

Context: 0.36

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Intercepts are reported as down-hole lengths and true widths are not confirmed for the drill results.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as down-hole lengths. True widths not confirmed.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that certified reference standards and blanks were inserted at a 1:20 rate for the Antimony Canyon drilling.

Evidence · text

“QA/QC: certified reference standards and blanks at 1:20 rate.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The drill intercepts are reported at a nominal cut-off of 0.1% Sb with a maximum of approximately 3m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“All intercepts reported at a nominal cut-off of 0.1% Sb with a maximum of approximately 3m internal dilution.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling at Little Emma has advanced the geological understanding of the Antimony Canyon stibnite system extending to the northeast of the historical open pit workings.

Evidence · text

“Drilling at Little Emma has advanced the geological understanding of the Antimony Canyon stibnite system extending to the northeast of the historical open pit workings”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: For White Spar rock chip samples, no Company certified reference material, blank or duplicate was submitted, and sampling precision is unmeasured.

Evidence · text

“LIMITATION: all quality control in this batch was laboratory-inserted; no Company certified reference material, blank or duplicate was submitted within the sample stream. Neither laboratory standard certifies Sb or Ag at the levels reported. No field duplicates were submitted and sampling precision is unmeasured.”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: Antimony Canyon samples show elevated arsenic, mercury, thallium, and molybdenum. White Spar samples show elevated lead, barium, strontium, mercury, and cadmium.

Evidence · text

“Pathfinder element signatures flanking the pod record elevated arsenic (1,618 ppm), mercury (11.7 ppm), thallium (100 ppm laboratory upper detection limit), and molybdenum (53.8 ppm)”

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: Del Sol recently produced 99.8% purity antimony ingot from White Spar material, demonstrating the processing pathway.

Evidence · text

“Del Sol recently producing 99.8% purity antimony ingot from White Spar material, exceeding Regulus II specifications.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Previously reported high-grade intercepts at Antimony Canyon (ACO2622026 and ACP26DD010) are re-stated for context.

Evidence · text

“Latest drilling builds on previously reported high-grade intercepts at Antimony Canyon, including: o 10.37m @ 3.98% Sb from 3.35m including 4.57m @ 8.56% Sb from 6.71m (ACO2622026)2 o 11.03m @ 3.1% Sb from 25.91m including 2.62m @12.54% Sb from 29.2m (ACP26DD010)3”

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 26. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (25)

ACP26DD023Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 18.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.49 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD023
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
18.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.49 m
From
28.35 m
To
29.84 m
Hole Depth
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
28.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD023:28.35-29.84
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420819.839
Northing
4216636.241
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very high-grade antimony intercept from new drilling, contributing to the understanding of the deposit, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“18.23”

Context: 1.49

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD023Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 33.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD023
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
33.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
29.05 m
To
29.84 m
Hole Depth
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
28.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD023:29.05-29.84
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420819.839
Northing
4216636.241
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade antimony sub-interval, confirming a significant mineralized pod, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High-grade antimony intercept
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“33.95”

Context: 0.79

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD023Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 68.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD023
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
68.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.36 m
From
29.05 m
To
29.41 m
Hole Depth
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
28.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD023:29.05-29.41
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420819.839
Northing
4216636.241
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade antimony sub-interval, representing near-pure massive stibnite and confirming a significant mineralized pod, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High-grade antimony intercept
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“68.10”

Context: 0.36

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD027Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD027
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.32 m
From
3.96 m
To
11.28 m
Hole Depth
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
3.96 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD027:3.96-11.28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
420888.212
Northing
4216804.353
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade antimony intercept from new drilling, extending the mineralized system, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 7.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD027Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD027
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.22 m
From
8.53 m
To
9.75 m
Hole Depth
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
3.96 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD027:8.53-9.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
420888.212
Northing
4216804.353
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-grade antimony sub-interval from new drilling, extending the mineralized system, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“1.96”

Context: 1.22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD029Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD029
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.19 m
From
7.62 m
To
14.81 m
Hole Depth
50.29 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD029:7.62-14.81
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
420886.754
Northing
4216802.867
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a weak-grade antimony intercept from new drilling, extending the mineralized system, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 7.19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD029Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD029
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
8.84 m
To
10.67 m
Hole Depth
50.29 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD029:8.84-10.67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
420886.754
Northing
4216802.867
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade antimony sub-interval from new drilling, extending the mineralized system, though true width is not confirmed and deleterious elements are noted.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 1.83

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD016Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD016
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
64.86 m
To
65.32 m
Hole Depth
83.82 m
Intercept Depth
64.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD016:64.86-65.32
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420832.436
Northing
4216682.199
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a weak-grade antimony intercept, though it contributes to the overall understanding of the mineralized system and QA/QC was disclosed.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD017Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.64 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD017
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.64 m
From
37.37 m
To
39.01 m
Hole Depth
62.48 m
Intercept Depth
37.37 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD017:37.37-39.01
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420831.037
Northing
4216682.447
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a weak-grade antimony intercept, though it confirms continuity of the mineralized system and QA/QC was disclosed.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1.64

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACP26DD018Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD018
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.77 m
From
47.98 m
To
50.75 m
Hole Depth
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
47.98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD018:47.98-50.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
420831.036
Northing
4216682.452
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, mercury, thallium, molybdenum

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% Sb
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a weak-grade antimony intercept, though it confirms continuity of the mineralized system and QA/QC was disclosed.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 2.77

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 11White Spar · silverGrade: 665Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
665
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Pit/trench spoil at northern end of corridor
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358033
Northing
3809182
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade silver rock chip sample, indicating significant mineralization, but it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations and not representative of in-situ grades or widths.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High-grade silver

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“665”

Context: WS008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 12White Spar · silverGrade: 394Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
394
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Quartz-rich spoil, pit at southern end of corridor
Latitude
34.4
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358193
Northing
3808599
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very high-grade silver rock chip sample, indicating significant mineralization, but it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations and not representative of in-situ grades or widths.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“394”

Context: WS007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 13White Spar · silverGrade: 432Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
432
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Eastern lode at historic shaft - separate structure
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358310
Northing
3809168
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very high-grade silver rock chip sample, indicating significant mineralization, but it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations and not representative of in-situ grades or widths.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“432”

Context: WS009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 14White Spar · silverGrade: 94.1Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
94.1
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Eastern lode, 3.5m SW of WS009
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358308
Northing
3809165
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-grade silver rock chip sample, indicating mineralization, but it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations and not representative of in-situ grades or widths.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“94.1”

Context: WS010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 15White Spar · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Green clay hangingwall to WS002; actively worked face
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358096
Northing
3808986
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“12.0”

Context: WS001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 16White Spar · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
24
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Quartz vein, visible stibnite, vuggy; 148–150°/84°→238°
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358096
Northing
3808986
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“24.0”

Context: WS002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 17White Spar · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Purple footwall alteration; sharp contact with vein
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358096
Northing
3808986
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: WS003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 18White Spar · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
23.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Same vein, 4–5m NE, opposite side of cutting
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358100
Northing
3808984
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“23.4”

Context: WS004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 19White Spar · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Southern extension of alteration, 108 m SSE
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358115
Northing
3808880
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: WS005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 20White Spar · silverGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Quartz float/spoil, southern end of corridor
Latitude
34.4
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358191
Northing
3808621
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade silver rock chip sample, but it contributes to the understanding of the mineralized system, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: WS006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 21White Spar · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
White Spar
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Historic trench, 17m SSE of WS009 - local background
Latitude
34.41
Longitude
-112.54
Easting
358316
Northing
3809152
CRS
WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, barium, strontium, mercury, cadmium

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low-grade silver rock chip sample, representing local background, though it is a selective surface sample with QA/QC limitations.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Rock chip samples are selective and not representative
  • QA/QC limitations
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: WS011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

ACO2622026Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.37 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACO2622026
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
3.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.37 m
From
3.35 m
To
13.72 m
Intercept Depth
3.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACO2622026:3.35-13.72

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-06-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously reported high-grade antimony intercept, re-stated for context, but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Stale data re-release
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“10.37m @ 3.98% Sb from 3.35m including 4.57m @ 8.56% Sb from 6.71m (ACO2622026)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ACO2622026Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 8.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACO2622026
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
8.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.57 m
From
6.71 m
To
11.28 m
Intercept Depth
6.71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACO2622026:6.71-11.28

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-06-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously reported high-grade antimony sub-interval, re-stated for context, but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Stale data re-release
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“4.57m @ 8.56% Sb from 6.71m (ACO2622026)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ACP26DD010Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.03 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD010
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.03 m
From
25.91 m
To
36.94 m
Intercept Depth
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD010:25.91-36.94

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously reported high-grade antimony intercept, re-stated for context, but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Stale data re-release
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“11.03m @ 3.1% Sb from 25.91m including 2.62m @12.54% Sb from 29.2m (ACP26DD010)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ACP26DD010Antimony Canyon · antimonyGrade: 12.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.62 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ACP26DD010
Project
Antimony Canyon
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
AT4

Geometry

Grade
12.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.62 m
From
29.2 m
To
31.82 m
Intercept Depth
29.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ACP26DD010:29.2-31.82

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously reported high-grade antimony sub-interval, re-stated for context, but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Stale data re-release
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“2.62m @12.54% Sb from 29.2m (ACP26DD010)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Metallurgical Results (1)

electrowinning and fire refiningDel Sol · antimonyHead Grade: 99.8Head Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Del Sol
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AT4

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
electrowinning and fire refining
Processing Route
electrowinning and fire refining
Sample
White Spar material

Recovery

Head Grade
99.8
Head Grade Unit
%
Conc. Grade
99.8
Conc. Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This fact confirms the successful production of high-purity antimony ingot from White Spar material, demonstrating the viability of the mine-to-metal strategy, though it is a reiteration of previously announced results.

Positive factors

  • Pilot scale complete
  • High purity product

Negative factors

  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“Del Sol recently producing 99.8% purity antimony ingot from White Spar material, exceeding Regulus II specifications.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.