Ashley Gold Corp. Announces Result of Exploratory Hole Between the 67Z and D99Z, Phase II TAK-26-06, Delivers 0.460 g/t Au over 25.50m from 6.50m Downhole, Including an Intercept of 9.560 g/t Au over 0.50m, 30.75m Downhole
Original announcement by cse on
- Company
- Ashley Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- ASHL
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 01:51:19 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Ashley Gold Corp. announced results from exploratory hole TAK-26-06, which delivered 0.460 g/t Au over 25.50m from 6.50m downhole, including a high-grade intercept of 9.560 g/t Au over 0.50m. This hole was drilled between the 67Z and D99Z zones, successfully confirming gold mineralization and continuity, which the company states is a significant step towards unifying the Tak zones. The results set the stage for a Phase IV step-out program to extend the mineralized horizon easterly. The company also provided context by referencing several historical drill results from previous campaigns.
Reasoning: The exploratory hole successfully confirmed gold mineralization and continuity between two previously isolated zones, which is a positive step for future exploration. While the overall grade is moderate to low, the presence of a bonanza-grade sub-interval is encouraging. The company's robust QA/QC procedures support the reliability of the results. However, the overall grade is below the company average and peer comparison, and the lack of true width information introduces uncertainty.
Positive factors
- Exploratory hole confirms gold mineralization and continuity between known zones, setting up future step-out drilling.
- High-grade sub-interval of 9.560 g/t Au over 0.50m demonstrates bonanza-grade potential.
- QA/QC procedures are thoroughly disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off, ensuring data reliability.
Negative factors
- The main intercept grade of 0.460 g/t Au is below the company's average and the 25th percentile for orogenic gold deposits.
- True thickness of the intercept is unknown, which may overstate the actual width.
- The high-grade intercept is very narrow, limiting its overall impact on the broader interval.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 19
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'Quality Assurance / Quality Control' section, mentioning certified lab, QP sign-off, and specific methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“The Company utilizes a drill rig recovering NQ core. All core is sealed in the field by the drill contractor and transported to the core logging facility. ... QAQC check samples are inserted every tenth sample consisting of either a blank substrate material, OREAS gold certified standard, or a duplicate is done by quarter cutting the previous sample interval and submitting the other quarter material as the QAQC sample.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'True thickness is unknown' for the reported intercepts.
Evidence · text
“True thickness is unknown.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The exploratory hole was drilled between two isolated zones (67Z and D99Z) to unify them, and the results set the stage for a 'Phase IV step-out program, where the Company will work towards extending the mineralized horizon from 67Z easterly'.
Evidence · text
“exploratory hole was drilled to target the depth extensions of two historically worked trenches... as we work toward unifying the Tak zones in one continuous mineralized body. ... TAK-26-06 sets the stage for the Phase IV step-out program, where the Company will work towards extending the mineralized horizon from 67Z easterly.”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 9.560 g/t Au is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · text
“9.560 g/t Au over 0.50m”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document includes several historical drill results from 1999, 2002, and earlier in 2026, explicitly stating they were 'previously reported' or from 'Southern Rio, 2002' or 'Triex, 1999'.
Evidence · text
“Some results discussed in this document are historical. Ashley Gold Corp. nor the qualified person have performed sufficient work or data verification of the historical data.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 19. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (19)
TAK-26-06Tak Patents · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-06
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.5 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-26-06:6.5-32
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept confirms mineralization and continuity in an exploratory hole, which is positive for future targeting. However, the grade is relatively low compared to company averages and peer deposits, and the lack of true width information adds uncertainty.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 25.50m.
- Confirms gold mineralization and continuity between previously isolated zones.
Negative factors
- Grade of 0.460 g/t Au is below the company's average (0.874 g/t Au) and the 25th percentile for orogenic gold deposits (0.73 g/t Au).
- True thickness is unknown, potentially overstating the actual width.
Evidence · text
“0.460 g/t Au over 25.50m from 6.50m Downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-06Tak Patents · goldGrade: 9.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-06
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 30.75 m
- To
- 31.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-26-06:30.75-31.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept demonstrates bonanza-grade potential within the target area, which is a strong positive. However, its very narrow width means its overall contribution to the broader interval's contained metal is limited.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade of 9.560 g/t Au, significantly above the 75th percentile for orogenic gold deposits (5.303 g/t Au).
- Highlights high-grade potential within the broader mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length of 0.50m, limiting overall contained metal.
- True thickness is unknown, potentially overstating the actual width.
Evidence · text
“9.560 g/t Au over 0.50m, 30.75m Downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-07Tak Patents · goldGrade: 0.861Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-07
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.861
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from TAK-26-07 shows good width with a moderate gold grade, contributing to the understanding of the 67Z zone. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length of 62.35m.
- Confirms gold mineralization in the 67Z zone.
Negative factors
- Grade of 0.861 g/t Au is moderate for orogenic gold.
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“0.861 g/t Au over 62.35 m From Below Collar”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-26-07Tak Patents · goldGrade: 1.111Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.85 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-07
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.111
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 45.85 m
- From
- 4.4 m
- To
- 50.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-26-07:4.4-50.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from TAK-26-07 shows good width and a moderate gold grade, reinforcing the prospectivity of the 67Z zone. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 45.85m with a moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“1.111 g/t Au over 45.85 m from 4.40 m Downhole in TAK-26-07”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-02-06Tak Patents · goldGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-02-06
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from 2002 shows a good gold grade over a moderate width. However, its age means it has very low novelty and confidence for current exploration.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
- No specific from/to depths provided for the interval.
Evidence · text
“3.08 g/t Au over 7.57 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-02-06Tak Patents · goldGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-02-06
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from 2002 shows a high gold grade, but its very narrow width and age limit its current significance.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“7.0 g/t Au over 1.1 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-02-07Tak Patents · goldGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-02-07
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from 2002 shows a good gold grade over a moderate width. Its age means it has very low novelty and confidence for current exploration.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
- No specific from/to depths provided for the interval.
Evidence · text
“3.18 g/t Au over 8.7 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-02-07Tak Patents · goldGrade: 9.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-02-07
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from 2002 shows a high gold grade, but its very narrow width and age limit its current significance.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“9.67 g/t Au over 0.8 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-99-10Tak Patents · goldGrade: 2.082Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-99-10
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.082
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.83 m
- From
- 3.57 m
- To
- 35.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-99-10:3.57-35.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1999-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from 1999 shows a good gold grade over a significant width, indicating early prospectivity. Its age means it has very low novelty and confidence for current exploration.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over a significant intercept length of 31.83m.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
Evidence · text
“2.082 g/t Au over 31.83 m from 3.57–35.40 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-99-10Tak Patents · goldGrade: 11.778Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.88 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-99-10
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.778
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.88 m
- From
- 3.57 m
- To
- 6.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-99-10:3.57-6.45
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1999-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from 1999 shows a bonanza gold grade, highlighting high-grade potential. Its age means it has very low novelty and confidence for current exploration.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
Evidence · text
“11.778 g/t Au over 2.88 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-99-10Tak Patents · goldGrade: 7.632Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-99-10
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.632
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 3.57 m
- To
- 4.67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAK-99-10:3.57-4.67
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1999-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from 1999 shows a high gold grade, but its very narrow width and age limit its current significance.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for an historical intercept.
Negative factors
- This is a very old historical result, significantly reducing its novelty and confidence.
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“7.632 g/t Au over 1.10 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-26-08Tak Patents · goldGrade: 0.729Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-08
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.729
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from TAK-26-08 shows good width with a moderate gold grade, contributing to the understanding of the 67Z zone. It is presented as part of the current Phase 2 drilling description.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length of 38.75m.
- Confirms gold mineralization in the 67Z zone.
Negative factors
- Grade of 0.729 g/t Au is moderate for orogenic gold and below company average.
Evidence · text
“0.729 g/t Au over 38.75m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-08Tak Patents · goldGrade: 0.961Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-08
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.961
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from TAK-26-08 shows good width and a moderate gold grade, reinforcing the prospectivity of the 67Z zone. It is presented as part of the current Phase 2 drilling description.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 27.50m with a moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- Grade of 0.961 g/t Au is moderate for orogenic gold.
Evidence · text
“0.961 g/t Au over 27.50m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-08Tak Patents · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-08
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from TAK-26-08 shows good width and a moderate gold grade, reinforcing the prospectivity of the 67Z zone. It is presented as part of the current Phase 2 drilling description.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 17.00m with a moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- Grade of 1.43 g/t Au is moderate for orogenic gold.
Evidence · text
“1.43 g/t Au over 17.00m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-08Tak Patents · goldGrade: 9.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-08
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept from TAK-26-08 demonstrates bonanza-grade potential within the target area, which is a strong positive. However, its very narrow width means its overall contribution to the broader interval's contained metal is limited.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade of 9.200 g/t Au, significantly above the 75th percentile for orogenic gold deposits (5.303 g/t Au).
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length of 0.50m, limiting overall contained metal.
Evidence · text
“9.200 g/t Au over 0.5 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TAK-26-01Tak Patents · goldGrade: 1.104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-01
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.104
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from TAK-26-01 shows good width and moderate gold grade, validating historic mineralization. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 28m with a moderate gold grade.
- Confirmed and validated historic near-surface mineralization.
Negative factors
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“1.104 g/t Au over 28 m from collar”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-26-01Tak Patents · goldGrade: 1.662Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-01
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.662
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from TAK-26-01 shows good width and moderate gold grade, reinforcing the validated mineralization. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length of 12m with a moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“1.662 g/t Au over 12 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-26-02Tak Patents · goldGrade: 0.586Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-02
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.586
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from TAK-26-02 shows significant width with a low gold grade, confirming broad mineralization. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length of 34.2m.
- Further confirmed broad width and continuity of the mineralized D99Z system.
Negative factors
- Grade of 0.586 g/t Au is low for orogenic gold.
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“0.586 g/t Au over 34.2 m from surface”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TAK-26-03Tak Patents · goldGrade: 2.347Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAK-26-03
- Project
- Tak Patents
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- ASHL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.347
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept from TAK-26-03 shows a good gold grade over a moderate width, confirming mineralization. Its novelty is low as it was previously released.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade for an historical intercept.
- Further confirmed broad width and continuity of the mineralized D99Z system.
Negative factors
- Moderate intercept length of 4.35m.
- This is a previously released historical result, reducing novelty.
Evidence · text
“2.347 g/t Au over 4.35 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.