# ARRAS MINERALS DRILLS 935.9M GRADING 0.71% CUEQ FROM SURFACE INCLUDING 214.9M GRADING 1.42% CUEQ STARTING AT 162.1M DEPTH FROM THE BEREZSKI NORTH PORPHYRY TARGET, ELEMES PROJECT IN KAZAKHSTAN

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-935-9m-grading-0-71-cueq-from-surface-including-214-9m-gra--a0be438d-a057-4626-8778-523a1482eff6

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/arras-minerals-drills-935-9m-100000543.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-06-09T10:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Arras Minerals Corp.

- Ticker: ARK

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Northeast Kazakhstan

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-08-20 22:02:11 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Arras Minerals has reported significant drill results from the Berezski North Target at the Elemes Project in Kazakhstan. The results include a 935.9m intercept grading 0.71% CuEq from surface, with a high-grade zone of 214.9m at 1.42% CuEq starting at 162.1m depth.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a very large intercept \(935.9m\) with strong CuEq grades, indicating a potentially massive porphyry system.

- Positive factor: significant intercept width

- Positive factor: high grade CuEq

- Positive factor: near-surface mineralization

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The results describe a significant porphyry target at the Berezski North Target.

Evidence · text

> Berezski North Target, Elemes Project

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-935-9m-grading-0-71-cueq-from-surface-including-214-9m-gra--a0be438d-a057-4626-8778-523a1482eff6#fact-drill-facts-0)

Elemes Project · copper

Needs review: ungrounded

#### Identity

- Project: Elemes Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Northeast Kazakhstan
- Ticker: ARK

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.71
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 935.9 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 935.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: porphyry
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.71
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: ungrounded
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 935.9m intercept is extremely wide for a porphyry target.

- Positive factor: exceptional width

Evidence · text

> 935.9M GRADING 0.71% CUEQ FROM SURFACE

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-935-9m-grading-0-71-cueq-from-surface-including-214-9m-gra--a0be438d-a057-4626-8778-523a1482eff6#fact-drill-facts-1)

Elemes Project · copper

Needs review: ungrounded

#### Identity

- Project: Elemes Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Northeast Kazakhstan
- Ticker: ARK

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.42
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 214.9 m
- From: 162.1 m
- To: 377 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: porphyry
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.42
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: ungrounded
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade 1.42% CuEq over a substantial 214.9m interval.

- Positive factor: strong grade

- Positive factor: significant width

Evidence · text

> 214.9M GRADING 1.42% CUEQ STARTING AT 162.1M DEPTH

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
