# ARRAS MINERALS DRILLS 276 METERS GRADING 0.58% CUEQ INCLUDING 104 METRES GRADING 1.14% CUEQ STARTING AT SURFACE ON BEREZSKI NORTH TARGET & ANNOUNCES CHANGES TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-276-meters-grading-0-58-cueq-including-104-metres-grading--c3f21a5d-7173-415c-aa35-335bb619aa5a

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-276-meters-100000343.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2025-09-08T10:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Arras Minerals Corp.

- Ticker: ARK

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Northeast Kazakhstan

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 07:06:37 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Arras Minerals has announced drill results from the Elemes Project in Kazakhstan, specifically from the Berezski North target. Drillhole EL25016 returned a 276m intercept at 0.58% CuEq, including a high-grade 104m section at 1.14% CuEq starting at surface.

Reasoning: The drillhole reports a substantial 276m intercept with a high-grade sub-interval starting at surface, indicating potential for a large, near-surface copper-equivalent deposit.

- Positive factor: significant intercept width

- Positive factor: near-surface mineralization

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The results are from an ongoing drilling program testing new targets along the Berezski trend.

Evidence · text

> ongoing drilling on the Elemes Project... to systematically test multiple high-priority targets

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### EL25016

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-276-meters-grading-0-58-cueq-including-104-metres-grading--c3f21a5d-7173-415c-aa35-335bb619aa5a#fact-drill-facts-0)

Elemes Project · copper

Needs review: ungrounded

#### Identity

- Hole ID: EL25016
- Project: Elemes Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Northeast Kazakhstan
- Ticker: ARK

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.58
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 276 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 276 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: EL25016:0-276

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: ungrounded
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 276m intercept at 0.58% CuEq is a significant width for an exploration target.

- Positive factor: large width

Evidence · text

> 276 METERS GRADING 0.58% CUEQ

### EL25016

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/arras-minerals-drills-276-meters-grading-0-58-cueq-including-104-metres-grading--c3f21a5d-7173-415c-aa35-335bb619aa5a#fact-drill-facts-1)

Elemes Project · copper

Needs review: ungrounded

#### Identity

- Hole ID: EL25016
- Project: Elemes Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Northeast Kazakhstan
- Ticker: ARK

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.14
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 104 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 104 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: EL25016:0-104

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: ungrounded
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 104m at 1.14% CuEq starting at surface is a strong high-grade intercept.

- Positive factor: high grade

- Positive factor: near surface

Evidence · text

> 104 METRES GRADING 1.14% CUEQ STARTING AT SURFACE

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.