ARL: Annual Report to shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Ardea Resources Limited
Ticker
ARL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Nickel
Secondary commodities
Cobalt, Scandium, Rare earth elements, Rare metals, Gold, Copper
Document categories
Resource update, Capital raise, Other
Extracted
2026-09-29 19:32:49 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Ardea Resources Limited's 2026 Annual Report details significant progress for its Kalgoorlie Nickel Project (KNP) - Goongarrie Hub, securing strategic recognition from Australian, Japanese, and US governments and potential project financing of up to A$1 billion. The company advanced its Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and strengthened partnerships, while also completing a successful A$5.34 million capital raise. The report also restates the JORC-compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for the KNP from June 2023, totaling 854 Mt at 0.71% Ni and 0.045% Co for 6.1 Mt contained nickel and 386 kt contained cobalt.

Reasoning: The annual report highlights significant strategic and operational progress for the Kalgoorlie Nickel Project, including government recognition, strong partnerships, and successful funding. While the DFS completion was extended and the resource estimate is stale, the overall outlook presented is positive for the company's long-term development.

Positive factors

  • Strategic recognition by governments for critical minerals project
  • Strengthened global partnerships and increased JV ownership
  • Progress in Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and value engineering
  • Successful capital raise strengthening the balance sheet
  • Significant contained metal in the resource estimate

Negative factors

  • DFS completion extended beyond original target
  • Resource estimate effective date is over two years old, indicating staleness

Facts used in scoring: 37

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document provides an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Kalgoorlie Nickel Project.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resource Estimate”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is reported in accordance with JORC Code (2012) guidelines.

Evidence · text

“JORC Code (2012) guidelines”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Resource Estimation is based on information reviewed or compiled by Mr Ian Buchhorn and Mr Andrew Penkethman, who are Competent Persons.

Evidence · text

“information reviewed or compiled by Mr Ian Buchhorn, and Mr Andrew Penkethman”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource estimate explicitly states a 0.5% nickel cut-off grade.

Evidence · text

“based on a greater than 0.5% Ni cut-off grade”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The effective date of the Mineral Resource Estimate is 30 June 2023, while the annual report is for FY2026 (published September 2026), making the estimate over two years old.

Evidence · text

“KNP nickel and cobalt MRE at 30 June 2023”

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a Measured category for nickel and cobalt.

Evidence · table

“Measured”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Measured

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an Indicated category for nickel and cobalt.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Indicated

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an Inferred category for nickel and cobalt.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Inferred

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 37. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (37)

Goongarrie HubKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 584000000Grade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4044Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:9b3acb7a8b0b986ee8c5
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
584000000
Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4044
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a very large nickel endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large combined resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“584”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Goongarrie HubKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 584000000Grade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 250Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:9b3acb7a8b0b986ee8c5
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
584000000
Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
250
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a very large cobalt endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large combined resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalpini Hub including Yerilla HubKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 270000000Grade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2056Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:cc793d27d44a015a7180
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
270000000
Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2056
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a large nickel endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large combined resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“270”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalpini Hub including Yerilla HubKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 270000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 136Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:cc793d27d44a015a7180
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
270000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
136
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a large cobalt endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large combined resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalgoorlie Nickel Project TotalKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 854000000Grade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 6101Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:c00caf9874a904869b5f
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Tonnes
854000000
Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
6101
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The grand total resource for the KNP represents a globally significant nickel endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Globally significant combined resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“854”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Grand Total

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalgoorlie Nickel Project TotalKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 854000000Grade: 0.045Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 386Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:c00caf9874a904869b5f
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Tonnes
854000000
Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
386
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The grand total resource for the KNP represents a globally significant cobalt endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Globally significant combined resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Grand Total

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Goongarrie HubKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 584000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:9b3acb7a8b0b986ee8c5
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
584000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a very large tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large combined resource tonnage for the Goongarrie Hub
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“584”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalpini Hub including Yerilla HubKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 270000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:cc793d27d44a015a7180
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Tonnes
270000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a large tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large combined resource tonnage for the Kalpini Hub
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“270”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Sub Total Combined

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Kalgoorlie Nickel Project TotalKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 854000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:c00caf9874a904869b5f
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Tonnes
854000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The grand total resource for the KNP represents a globally significant tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Globally significant combined resource tonnage for the KNP
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“854”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Grand Total

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 18000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:785d083b12d569fdf2df
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
18000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Goongarrie Hub shows high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“18”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 277000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:5a5cdff13a517f7eeefe
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
277000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a significant tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“277”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 289000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:2ff0e129497cb5880a09
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
289000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Goongarrie Hub indicates significant potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“289”

Context: Goongarrie Hub1 Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 4000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:be4c2cec04862b0e8ba9
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Kalpini Hub shows high confidence, but the tonnage is relatively small and the estimate is stale.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Relatively small tonnage for Measured category
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 84000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:dfc57cd8642cd0f00966
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
84000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a significant tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“84”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 182000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:81571c22b9e7cffc1125
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
182000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Kalpini Hub indicates significant potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“182”

Context: Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub2 Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 22000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:ccdd0ecb1916f0367ec3
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
22000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the total KNP shows high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“22”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 361000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:c689ad7fd10faa5ec99b
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
361000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the total KNP represents a very large tonnage, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large Indicated resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“361”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel ProjectTonnes: 471000000Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:37d3de7a7559ba98b880
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
471000000
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the total KNP indicates very large potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Very large Inferred resource tonnage
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“471”

Context: Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

Fact 19Kalgoorlie Nickel ProjectView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:40b4c6856c1ffab4ffb8
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-03-01

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Share Purchase Plan raised an additional A$340,000, further contributing to the company's financial strength.

Positive factors

  • Successful Share Purchase Plan
  • Strengthened the Company's balance sheet

Evidence · text

“subsequently completed a Share Purchase Plan raising a further A$340,000”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 18000000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 171Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:8c119de361baef470d2d
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
18000000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
171
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Goongarrie Hub shows good nickel grade and high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 18

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 18000000Grade: 0.085Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 15Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:8c119de361baef470d2d
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
18000000
Grade
0.085
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
15
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Goongarrie Hub shows good cobalt grade and high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.085”

Context: 18

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 277000000Grade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1923Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:d5f62df7d77a812ef5fc
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
277000000
Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1923
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a significant tonnage of nickel, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 277

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 277000000Grade: 0.046Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 127Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:d5f62df7d77a812ef5fc
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
277000000
Grade
0.046
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
127
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Goongarrie Hub represents a significant tonnage of cobalt, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.046”

Context: 277

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 289000000Grade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1951Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:0456e53a6d150becca6a
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
289000000
Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1951
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Goongarrie Hub indicates significant nickel potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 289

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 289000000Grade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 108Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:0456e53a6d150becca6a
Deposit or zone
Goongarrie Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
289000000
Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
108
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Goongarrie Hub indicates significant cobalt potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 289

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 36Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:eb164c93b5fbdaa98f24
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
36
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Kalpini Hub shows good nickel grade and high confidence, but the tonnage is relatively small and the estimate is stale.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Relatively small tonnage for Measured category
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.048Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:eb164c93b5fbdaa98f24
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.048
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the Kalpini Hub shows good cobalt grade and high confidence, but the tonnage is relatively small and the estimate is stale.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Relatively small tonnage for Measured category
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.048”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 84000000Grade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 699Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:988b338e3fa07c3e371d
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
84000000
Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
699
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a significant tonnage of nickel, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 84

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 84000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 42Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:988b338e3fa07c3e371d
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
84000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
42
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Kalpini Hub represents a significant tonnage of cobalt, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: 84

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 182000000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1321Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:f3fbe42a6382a1afde96
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
182000000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1321
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Kalpini Hub indicates significant nickel potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 182

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 182000000Grade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 92Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:f3fbe42a6382a1afde96
Deposit or zone
Kalpini Hub including Yerilla Hub
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
182000000
Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
92
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the Kalpini Hub indicates significant cobalt potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: 182

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 22000000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 207Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:329002b426d2e5c32f14
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
22000000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
207
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the total KNP shows good nickel grade and high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 22

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

measuredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 22000000Grade: 0.079Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 17Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:329002b426d2e5c32f14
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
22000000
Grade
0.079
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for the total KNP shows good cobalt grade and high confidence, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.079”

Context: 22

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 361000000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2622Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:5dc973ab3c06e2c9eecb
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
361000000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2622
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the total KNP represents a very large nickel endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 361

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

indicatedKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 361000000Grade: 0.047Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 169Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:5dc973ab3c06e2c9eecb
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
361000000
Grade
0.047
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
169
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the total KNP represents a very large cobalt endowment, but the estimate is stale as it dates back to June 2023.

Positive factors

  • Very large Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.047”

Context: 361

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · nickelTonnes: 471000000Grade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3272Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:ec5207abd670dfe431d9
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
471000000
Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3272
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the total KNP indicates very large nickel potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Very large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good nickel grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 471

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

inferredKalgoorlie Nickel Project · cobaltTonnes: 471000000Grade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 200Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
ARL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ian Buchhorn, Andrew Penkethman
Resource group id
resource:ec5207abd670dfe431d9
Deposit or zone
Kalgoorlie Nickel Project Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
471000000
Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
200
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for the total KNP indicates very large cobalt potential, but its lower confidence category and stale effective date reduce its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Very large Inferred resource tonnage
  • Good cobalt grade for laterite deposit
  • JORC compliant and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence
  • Estimate effective date is over two years old

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 471

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.2 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.