Arizona Gold & Silver Intersects 21.79 Metres grading 4.10 g/t Gold at Philadelphia

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Arizona Gold & Silver Inc.
Ticker
AZS
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-20 17:42:16 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Arizona Gold & Silver reported high-grade gold and silver drill results from the Philadelphia Project, extending the mineralized zone 150 metres vertically above the Perry Zone. The results demonstrate a broad hydrothermal system with significant up-dip extensions and improved geological continuity.

Reasoning: Significant gold-silver intercepts extending the known mineralized envelope vertically by 150m, supported by robust QA/QC and expanded permitting.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Broad mineralized zone

Facts used in scoring: 24

Atlas analysis — Arizona Gold & Silver Inc.: Arizona Gold & Silver Intersects 21.79 Metres grading 4.10 g/t Gold at Philadelphia. 3.1 g/t over 37.34 m; 4.1 g/t over 21.79 m; 0.7 g/t over 62.27 m

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Results extend mineralization approximately 150 metres vertically above previously reported high-grade intersections.

Evidence · text

“extend both high-grade and broad zones of gold mineralization approximately 150 metres vertically above previously reported high-grade intersections”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes details on Skyline Labs, ISO 9001:2015, and use of standards and blanks.

Evidence · text

“All core samples were processed at Skyline Labs in Tucson, Arizona, International Standard ISO 9001:2015.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 10.19 g/t Au exceeds the exceptional threshold for epithermal gold.

Evidence · table

“10.19”

Context: 0.98

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (24)

PC26-169Philadelphia · goldGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-169
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
4.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.79 m
From
256.18 m
To
277.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-169:256.18-277.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 4.10 g/t Au over 21.79m is a strong intercept for an epithermal system.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for epithermal

Evidence · table

“4.1”

Context: 21.79

PC26-169Philadelphia · silverGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-169
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.79 m
From
256.18 m
To
277.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-169:256.18-277.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade accompanies high-grade gold intercept.

Evidence · table

“5.8”

Context: 21.79

PC26-165Philadelphia · goldGrade: 10.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-165
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
10.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.98 m
From
142.19 m
To
143.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-165:142.19-143.16
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 10.19 g/t Au is exceptionally high grade for this deposit type.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Evidence · table

“10.19”

Context: 0.98

PC26-165Philadelphia · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-165
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.98 m
From
142.19 m
To
143.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-165:142.19-143.16
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade accompanies high-grade gold intercept.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 0.98

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.34 m
From
245.36 m
To
282.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:245.36-282.7
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.1 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 115.8 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 3.1 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.1”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
7.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.34 m
From
245.36 m
To
282.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:245.36-282.7
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 265.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.1”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
1.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41.97 m
From
242.41 m
To
284.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:242.41-284.38
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 70.9 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.69”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41.97 m
From
242.41 m
To
284.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:242.41-284.38
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 184.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
3.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
110.83 m
To
113.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:110.83-113.93
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.34 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.34 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.34”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 12.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
12.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
110.83 m
To
113.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:110.83-113.93
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.7”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.27 m
From
109.42 m
To
171.69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:109.42-171.69
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 43.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.27 m
From
109.42 m
To
171.69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:109.42-171.69
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 124.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: within

PC26-167Philadelphia · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-167
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
2.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.24 m
From
229.21 m
To
244.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-167:229.21-244.45
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.66 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 40.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.66 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.66”

Context: PC26-167

PC26-167Philadelphia · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-167
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.24 m
From
229.21 m
To
244.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-167:229.21-244.45
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 85.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.6”

Context: PC26-167

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.35 m
From
226.77 m
To
255.12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:226.77-255.12
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 62.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.19 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.35 m
From
226.77 m
To
255.12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:226.77-255.12
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 224.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.9”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 66.81 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
66.81 m
From
191.11 m
To
257.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:191.11-257.92
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.12 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 74.8 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 66.81 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
66.81 m
From
191.11 m
To
257.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:191.11-257.92
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 267.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.0”

Context: within

PC26-166Philadelphia · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-166
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.37 m
From
247.35 m
To
248.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-166:247.35-248.72
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.02 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.02 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.02”

Context: PC26-166

PC26-166Philadelphia · silverGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PC26-166
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.37 m
From
247.35 m
To
248.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PC26-166:247.35-248.72
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.6”

Context: PC26-166

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
1.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.7 m
From
234.62 m
To
258.32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:234.62-258.32
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.42 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 33.7 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.42”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
6.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.7 m
From
234.62 m
To
258.32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:234.62-258.32
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 161.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.8”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.94 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.94 m
From
227.69 m
To
260.63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:227.69-260.63
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.6 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: within

withinPhiladelphia · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.94 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
within
Project
Philadelphia
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
AZS

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.94 m
From
227.69 m
To
260.63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
within:227.69-260.63
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 197.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: within

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.