Argenta Silver Intersects 0.45 g/t Au and 0.19 % Cu over 46.0m at Gold-Copper target; 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0m including 2,780 g/t Ag over 2.0m at Resource Expansion Drilling Area

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Argenta Silver Corp.
Ticker
AGAG.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Salta Province, Argentina
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-05 12:23:39 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Argenta Silver Corp. announced high-grade drill results from its El Quevar Project in Argentina, including 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0m and a new gold-copper zone with 0.45 g/t Au and 0.19% Cu over 46.0m. These results expand the Yaxtché deposit's footprint and confirm a new gold-copper target at depth. Additionally, a historical core re-sampling program identified significant new silver mineralization, which will be incorporated into an upcoming Mineral Resource Estimate update.

Reasoning: Argenta Silver reported high-grade silver intercepts, including bonanza grades, and a new gold-copper mineralized zone, significantly expanding the project's potential. Successful re-sampling of historical core also added new mineralization, contributing to an upcoming resource update.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercepts
  • New gold-copper discovery
  • Resource footprint expansion
  • Successful historical core re-sampling
  • Strong infrastructure

Negative factors

  • Assay turnaround times were extended
  • True width not yet calculated for new data

Facts used in scoring: 59

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 59. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (59)

QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 152Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
152
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
185 m
To
187 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:185-187
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades within the new gold-copper target, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized system.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“152”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
185 m
To
187 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:185-187
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
185 m
To
187 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:185-187
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
185 m
To
187 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:185-187
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
185 m
To
187 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:185-187
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
132
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
190 m
To
191 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:190-191
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“132”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
190 m
To
191 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:190-191
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
190 m
To
191 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:190-191
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
190 m
To
191 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:190-191
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
190 m
To
191 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:190-191
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
209 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:209-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, below the stated cut-off, within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
209 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:209-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
209 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:209-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
209 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:209-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
209 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:209-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
220 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:220-222
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, below the stated cut-off, within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“66”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
220 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:220-222
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
220 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:220-222
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
220 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:220-222
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 2.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
2.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
220 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:220-222
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.29”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
46 m
From
233 m
To
279 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:233-279
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows very low silver grades, below the stated cut-off, within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13”

Context: 46.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
46 m
From
233 m
To
279 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:233-279
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate gold grades, confirming a new gold-copper mineralized zone at the Carmen target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Continuous interval

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 46.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-465 is described as a 165-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-465:drilling of this 165-meter step-out hole reached a final depth of 410.0 meters.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
46 m
From
233 m
To
279 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:233-279
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 46.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-465 is described as a 165-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-465:drilling of this 165-meter step-out hole reached a final depth of 410.0 meters.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
46 m
From
233 m
To
279 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:233-279
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 46.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-465 is described as a 165-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-465:drilling of this 165-meter step-out hole reached a final depth of 410.0 meters.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
46 m
From
233 m
To
279 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:233-279
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept shows moderate copper grades, confirming a new gold-copper mineralized zone at the Carmen target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Continuous interval

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 46.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-465 is described as a 165-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-465:drilling of this 165-meter step-out hole reached a final depth of 410.0 meters.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:245-256
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, below the stated cut-off, within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:245-256
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Continuous interval

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:245-256
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:245-256
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:245-256
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Continuous interval

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
258 m
To
262 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:258-262
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, below the stated cut-off, within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
258 m
To
262 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:258-262
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
258 m
To
262 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:258-262
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
258 m
To
262 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:258-262
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
258 m
To
262 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:258-262
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267 m
To
268 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:267-268
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“100”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · goldGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
1.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267 m
To
268 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:267-268
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.71”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
267 m
To
268 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:267-268
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace lead grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
267 m
To
268 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:267-268
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace zinc grades within the new gold-copper target.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-465El Quevar · copperGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-465
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
2.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
267 m
To
268 m
Hole Depth
410 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-465:267-268
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Easting
3419341
Northing
7306776
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong copper grades within the new gold-copper target.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.43”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · silverGrade: 1599Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
1599
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
310 m
To
314 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-314
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows bonanza silver grades from a 100-meter step-out hole, significantly expanding the high-grade silver mineralization at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1,599”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,599 g/t over 4.0m is well above the exceptional threshold for silver (500 g/t).

Evidence · table

“1,599”

Context: 4.0

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
310 m
To
314 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-314
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace gold grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
310 m
To
314 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-314
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate lead grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
310 m
To
314 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-314
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace zinc grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
310 m
To
314 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-314
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low copper grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · silverGrade: 2780Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
2780
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
310 m
To
312 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-312
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza silver grades from a 100-meter step-out hole, significantly expanding the high-grade silver mineralization at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2,780”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 2,780 g/t over 2.0m is well above the exceptional threshold for silver (500 g/t).

Evidence · table

“2,780”

Context: 2.0

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
310 m
To
312 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-312
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace gold grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
310 m
To
312 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-312
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate lead grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
310 m
To
312 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-312
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows trace zinc grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
310 m
To
312 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:310-312
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low copper grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · silverGrade: 192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
389 m
To
395 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:389-395
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“192”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
389 m
To
395 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:389-395
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace gold grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · leadGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
3.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
389 m
To
395 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:389-395
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong lead grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.01”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · zincGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
389 m
To
395 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:389-395
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate zinc grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-475El Quevar · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-475
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
copper
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
389 m
To
395 m
Hole Depth
451 m
Intercept Depth
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-475:389-395
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3417640
Northing
7307476
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace copper grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-475 is described as a 100-meter step-out hole, extending high-grade silver mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-475 – Northwest Extension:drilling of this 100-meter step-out hole intersected high-grade silver mineralization, returning 1,599 g/t Ag over 4.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-479El Quevar · silverGrade: 122Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-479
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
122
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
145 m
To
155 m
Hole Depth
347 m
Intercept Depth
145 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-479:145-155
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3419315
Northing
7306746
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades from a step-out hole, expanding the Yaxtché deposit to the southeast.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“122”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-479 is described as a 130-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization to the southeast.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-479 – Southeast Extension:drilling of this 130-meter step-out hole intersected 122 g/t Ag over 9.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-479El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-479
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
145 m
To
155 m
Hole Depth
347 m
Intercept Depth
145 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-479:145-155
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3419315
Northing
7306746
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-479 is described as a 130-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization to the southeast.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-479 – Southeast Extension:drilling of this 130-meter step-out hole intersected 122 g/t Ag over 9.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-479El Quevar · leadGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-479
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
145 m
To
155 m
Hole Depth
347 m
Intercept Depth
145 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QVD-479:145-155
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Yaxtché Deposit
Easting
3419315
Northing
7306746
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
100
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows trace lead grades from a step-out hole at Yaxtché.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: Hole QVD-479 is described as a 130-meter step-out hole, extending mineralization to the southeast.

Evidence · text

“Hole QVD-479 – Southeast Extension:drilling of this 130-meter step-out hole intersected 122 g/t Ag over 9.0 m”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC statement mentioning independent monitoring, blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names ALS Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“All geochemical sample assay results from Argenta Silver have been independently monitored through a rigorous QA/QC protocol. This protocol includes the regular insertion of blind standard reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true widths vary and cannot be calculated at this time, indicating that reported lengths are downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Estimated true widths vary between 60 to 85% of core reported length. Insufficient re-modelling and drill density on new data has been completed to calculate true width at this time.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: Table 1 explicitly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intervals.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: 2025-2026 Summer Drilling Program Sixth Batch of Assays (cut-off 100g/t Ag)”
QVD-425El Quevar · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QVD-425
Project
El Quevar
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGAG.V

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44 m
From
316 m
To
360 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Carmen Gold-Copper target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades within the new gold-copper target, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized system.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“44.00m grading 0.57 g/t Au and 0.58% Cu**(from 316m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.