Archive
Original announcement by thenewswire on
- Company
- Vanguard Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- UUU
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Rhenium
- Document categories
- Other, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 06:03:00 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Vanguard Mining Corp. has completed its 2025 drill program at the Redonda Copper-Molybdenum Project in British Columbia, with assay results pending. The company also provided historical drill results from 2023 and 1979, which indicate copper-molybdenum mineralization but are not independently verified or NI 43-101 compliant. These historical results will be used to guide future exploration planning.
Reasoning: The company announced the completion of its 2025 drill program, but the lack of new assay results limits immediate impact. The provided historical drill results offer context but are not novel.
Positive factors
- Drill program completed as planned
- Historical data indicates copper-molybdenum mineralization
- Engagement with First Nations
Negative factors
- No new assay results reported
- Historical results not independently verified or NI 43-101 compliant
- Visual observations are not indicative of grades
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 85
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 85. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (85)
Red-23-04Redonda · copperGrade: 0.452Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.452
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 18.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:3.1-18.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.452”
Context: 15.2 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0265
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 18.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:3.1-18.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0265”
Context: 15.2 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.1053Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1053
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 18.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:3.1-18.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.1053”
Context: 15.2 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · copperGrade: 0.235Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.235
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:25.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.235”
Context: 72.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0228Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0228
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:25.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0228”
Context: 72.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.1106Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1106
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:25.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.1106”
Context: 72.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · copperGrade: 0.212Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.212
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 147.8 m
- To
- 163.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:147.8-163.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.212”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0154Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0154
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 147.8 m
- To
- 163.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:147.8-163.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0154”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-04Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0514Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0514
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 147.8 m
- To
- 163.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-04:147.8-163.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0514”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · copperGrade: 0.329Grade Unit: %Intercept: 45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.329
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 45 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:3.1-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.329”
Context: 45.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0265
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 45 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:3.1-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0265”
Context: 45.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.1111Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1111
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 45 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:3.1-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.1111”
Context: 45.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · copperGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.323
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 77.3 m
- From
- 68.8 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:68.8-141
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.323”
Context: 77.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0197Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0197
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 77.3 m
- From
- 68.8 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:68.8-141
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0197”
Context: 77.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0791Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 77.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0791
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 77.3 m
- From
- 68.8 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:68.8-141
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0791”
Context: 77.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · copperGrade: 0.174Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.174
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 199.5 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:199.5-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.174”
Context: 10.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0117Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0117
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 199.5 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:199.5-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0117”
Context: 10.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-03Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0563Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0563
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 199.5 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-03:199.5-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0563”
Context: 10.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · copperGrade: 0.213Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.213
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:2.7-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.213”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0192Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0192
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:2.7-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0192”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0749Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0749
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:2.7-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0749”
Context: 30.3 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · copperGrade: 0.279Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.279
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 142.6 m
- From
- 39.3 m
- To
- 182 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:39.3-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.279”
Context: 142.6 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0281Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0281
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 142.6 m
- From
- 39.3 m
- To
- 182 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:39.3-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0281”
Context: 142.6 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-05Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0927Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 142.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-05
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0927
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 142.6 m
- From
- 39.3 m
- To
- 182 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-05:39.3-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0927”
Context: 142.6 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · copperGrade: 0.251Grade Unit: %Intercept: 108 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.251
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 108 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:3.1-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.251”
Context: 108.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 108 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 108 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:3.1-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0250”
Context: 108.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.1025Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 108 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1025
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 108 m
- From
- 3.1 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:3.1-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.1025”
Context: 108.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · copperGrade: 0.375Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.375
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 169.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:158.5-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.375”
Context: 10.7 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.1377Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1377
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 169.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:158.5-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.1377”
Context: 10.7 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-02Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.5871Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-02
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5871
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 169.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-02:158.5-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.5871”
Context: 10.7 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-01Redonda · copperGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-01
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.136
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-01:60-67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.136”
Context: 7.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-01Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-01
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-01:60-67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0023”
Context: 7.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Red-23-01Redonda · rheniumGrade: 0.0167Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Red-23-01
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- rhenium
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0167
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Red-23-01:60-67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical rhenium intercept from the 2023 exploration program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.0167”
Context: 7.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 : 2023 Exploration Program”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "2023 Exploration Program".
Evidence · text
“2023 Exploration Program”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-2Redonda · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-2
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 90 m
- From
- 110 m
- To
- 200 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-2:110-200
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 90.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-2Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.011389Grade Unit: %Intercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-2
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011389
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 90 m
- From
- 110 m
- To
- 200 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-2:110-200
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: 90.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-2Redonda · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-2
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.1 m
- From
- 3.4 m
- To
- 27.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-2:3.4-27.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 24.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-2Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.04495Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-2
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04495
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.1 m
- From
- 3.4 m
- To
- 27.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-2:3.4-27.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.075”
Context: 24.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:35-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 25.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.014386Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014386
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:35-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: 25.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 67.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:67.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 30.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.07193Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07193
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 67.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:67.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.120”
Context: 30.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 152.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:140-152.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 12.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-3Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.008991Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-3
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008991
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 152.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-3:140-152.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: 12.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 53.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 53.1 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 55.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:2.7-55.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 53.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.014986Grade Unit: %Intercept: 53.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014986
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 53.1 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 55.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:2.7-55.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: 53.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42.5 m
- From
- 92.5 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:92.5-135
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 42.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.022778Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022778
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42.5 m
- From
- 92.5 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:92.5-135
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.038”
Context: 42.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
- From
- 155 m
- To
- 172.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:155-172.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 17.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.005994Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005994
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
- From
- 155 m
- To
- 172.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:155-172.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: 17.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 182.5 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:182.5-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 27.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-5Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.012588Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-5
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012588
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 182.5 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-5:182.5-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: 27.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-6Redonda · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-6
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-6:2.5-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 27.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-6Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.034766Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-6
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034766
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-6:2.5-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.058”
Context: 27.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-6Redonda · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-6
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 142.5 m
- To
- 155.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-6:142.5-155.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-6Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.026974Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-6
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026974
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 142.5 m
- To
- 155.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-6:142.5-155.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-7Redonda · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-7
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 37.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-7:30-37.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 7.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-7Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.002398Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-7
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002398
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 37.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-7:30-37.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: 7.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-8Redonda · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-8
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-8:125-135
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-8Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.02038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-8
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02038
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-8:125-135
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-9Redonda · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-9
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-9:5-15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-9Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.008392Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-9
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008392
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-9:5-15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: 10.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-9Redonda · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-9
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-9:97.5-110
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 12.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
DOH R79-9Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.006593Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DOH R79-9
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006593
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DOH R79-9:97.5-110
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1979-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical molybdenum intercept (converted from MoS2) from the 1979 drilling program, not new to this release.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- No QA/QC disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: 12.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Results are historical and not new to this release.
Evidence · text
“Table 2 : 1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Only downhole length is provided, no true width stated.
Evidence · text
“Core Length”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: Historical results are not independently verified and no QA/QC details are provided for them.
Evidence · text
“The Company has not independently verified these results and is not treating them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”
Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The program is explicitly called "1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.".
Evidence · text
“1979 Drilling Completed By Teck Corp.”
Porphyry DepositRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: The geological setting shares characteristics with nearby porphyry systems and targets are described as "key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems".
Evidence · text
“key vectors in porphyry copper-molybdenum systems”
Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · copperGrade: 0.452Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.452
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.452 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.452 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.452”
Context: Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0265
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0265 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0265”
Context: Hole Red-23-04 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-04Redonda · copperGrade: 0.235Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.235
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.235 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 16.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.235”
Context: Hole Red-23-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-04Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0228Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0228
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0228 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0228”
Context: Hole Red-23-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · copperGrade: 0.212Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.212
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.212 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.212”
Context: Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0154Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0154
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0154 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0154”
Context: Hole Red-23-04 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · copperGrade: 0.329Grade Unit: %Intercept: 45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.329
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.329 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 14.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.329”
Context: Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0265
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0265 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0265”
Context: Hole Red-23-03 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03Redonda · copperGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.323
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.323 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.323”
Context: Hole Red-23-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03Redonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0197Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0197
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0197 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0197”
Context: Hole Red-23-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · copperGrade: 0.174Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.174
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.174 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.174”
Context: Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0117Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0117
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0117 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0117”
Context: Hole Red-23-03 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · copperGrade: 0.213Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.213
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.213 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.213”
Context: Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0192Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0192
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0192 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0192”
Context: Hole Red-23-05 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · copperGrade: 0.279Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.279
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 142.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.279 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 39.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.279”
Context: Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0281Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0281
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 142.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0281 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0281”
Context: Hole Red-23-05 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · copperGrade: 0.251Grade Unit: %Intercept: 108 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.251
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 108 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.251 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 27.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.251”
Context: Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts from surfaceRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 108 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts from surface
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 108 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.025 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0250”
Context: Hole Red-23-02 – Mineralization starts f
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · copperGrade: 0.375Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.375
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.375 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.375”
Context: Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good gradeRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.1377Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good grade
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1377
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.1377 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.1377”
Context: Hole Red-23-02 – Hole bottoms in good gr
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole collared outside potassic zoneRedonda · copperGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole collared outside potassic zone
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.136
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.136 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.136 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.136”
Context: Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole colla
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole collared outside potassic zoneRedonda · molybdenumGrade: 0.0023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole collared outside potassic zone
- Project
- Redonda
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- UUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.0023 % molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.0023”
Context: Hole Red-23-01 – Confirmation hole colla
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.