Appia Reports Diamond Drilling on ULTRA HARD ROCK Carbonatite Target Intercepts 300m at 2.55% Total Rare Earth Oxide from Surface Including 1.7m at 14.27% TREO in Goias, Brazil
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp.
- Ticker
- API
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- Goias, Brazil
- Primary commodity
- Rare earth
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-20 10:08:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. has announced preliminary assay results from a 26-hole diamond drilling program at the Ultra Hard Rock carbonatite target in Brazil. The program identified a significant 300m intercept at 2.55% TREO from surface, including a high-grade 1.7m interval at 14.27% TREO.
Reasoning: The announcement reports a very thick 300m intercept at 2.55% TREO from surface, including a high-grade 1.7m zone, which is highly significant for a carbonatite target.
Positive factors
- significant intercept thickness
- high-grade sub-interval
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The announcement describes new intercepts from a completed 26-hole program at a specific target.
Evidence · text
“completed a 26-hole diamond drilling program”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Ultra Hard Rock · rare earthGrade: 2.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 300 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ultra Hard Rock
- Commodity
- rare earth
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- brazil
- Ticker
- API
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 300 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ultra_Hard_Rock:0-300
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 300m intercept at 2.55% TREO from surface is a substantial discovery-scale interval for a carbonatite target.
Positive factors
- significant thickness
- intercepts from surface
Evidence · text
“Intercepts 300m at 2.55% Total Rare Earth Oxide from Surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Ultra Hard Rock · rare earthGrade: 14.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ultra Hard Rock
- Commodity
- rare earth
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- brazil
- Ticker
- API
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 14.27% TREO is a very high-grade interval within the larger mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- exceptionally high grade
Evidence · text
“1.7m at 14.27% TREO”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.