Angkor Resources Reports Copper Mineralization Over 286 Metres At Thmei North Prospect, Cambodia

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Angkor Resources Corp.
Ticker
ANK
Exchange
TSX
Region
Cambodia
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-08-22 22:42:11 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Angkor Resources reported continuous copper mineralization over 286.2 metres in drill hole AB25-009 at the Thmei North prospect in Cambodia. Grades increased with depth, reaching 0.25% Cu over 52.6 metres at the bottom of the hole.

Reasoning: The hole AB25-009 shows a continuous copper interval with grades increasing at depth, which is encouraging for a porphyry-skarn system, though regional conflict has halted further drilling.

Positive factors

  • significant grade increase at depth
  • continuous mineralization over 286m
  • potassic alteration indicator

Negative factors

  • drilling halted due to border conflict
  • early stage exploration

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release names a Qualified Person (Dennis Ouellette, P.Geo.) and references NI 43-101 compliance.

Evidence · text

“Dennis Ouellette, B.Sc., P.Geo., is... a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

AB25-009Thmei North · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 286.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AB25-009
Project
Thmei North
Commodity
copper
Region
cambodia
Reported Region
Cambodia
Ticker
ANK

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
286.2 m
From
0 m
To
286.2 m
Hole Depth
312.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AB25-009:0.0-286.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Overall average grade of 0.13% Cu over a significant width of 286.2m.

Positive factors

  • continuous mineralization

Evidence · text

“returning an overall average of 1,309 parts per million (ppm) copper (0.13% Cu)”
AB25-009Thmei North · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 67.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AB25-009
Project
Thmei North
Commodity
copper
Region
cambodia
Reported Region
Cambodia
Ticker
ANK

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
67.3 m
From
244.9 m
To
312.2 m
Hole Depth
312.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AB25-009:244.9-312.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The bottom section shows higher grade than the overall average.

Positive factors

  • grade increase at depth

Evidence · text

“The bottom 67.3 metres of the hole averaged 2,181 ppm copper (0.22% Cu)”
AB25-009Thmei North · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 52.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AB25-009
Project
Thmei North
Commodity
copper
Region
cambodia
Reported Region
Cambodia
Ticker
ANK

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
52.6 m
From
259.6 m
To
312.2 m
Hole Depth
312.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AB25-009:259.6-312.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A notable high-grade sub-interval within the bottom section.

Positive factors

  • high grade interval at depth

Evidence · text

“including a 52.6-metre interval grading 2,493 ppm copper (0.25% Cu)”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.