Amex Drills 110.05 g/t Au over 2.15 m in Continuation of Bulk Sample Grade Control Program

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Amex Exploration Inc.
Ticker
AMX
Exchange
LSE
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 14:04:16 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Amex Exploration Inc. has announced high-grade gold drill results from its ongoing grade control program for the Champagne Zone bulk sample. The results include an intercept of 110.05 g/t gold over 2.15 metres, with visible gold being regularly observed in logged holes.

Reasoning: The headline reports an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept (110.05 g/t) which is highly material for a grade control program, supported by visual observations of gold.

Positive factors

  • high-grade intercept
  • visible gold noted

Facts used in scoring: 1

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 110.05 g/t gold significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · text

“110.05 g/t Au”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (1)

Fact 1Champagne Zone · goldGrade: 110.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Champagne Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
AMX

Geometry

Grade
110.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 110.05 g/t gold is an exceptional grade intercept.

Positive factors

  • bonanza grade

Evidence · text

“110.05 g/t Au over 2.15 m”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.