Amex Announces Filing of Feasibility Phase 1 Technical Report for the Perron Gold Mine

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Amex Exploration Inc.
Ticker
AMX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Québec, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper
Document categories
Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-22 22:32:58 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Amex Exploration Inc. has filed a NI 43-101 technical report supporting a Phase 1 Feasibility Study for the Perron Gold Project in Quebec. The study reports Proven and Probable reserves of 1.989 million tonnes at 12.1 g/t gold, with an estimated NPV of C$1.13 billion and an IRR of 114.6%.

Reasoning: The filing of a Phase 1 Feasibility Study for a high-grade gold project with strong economics is a major de-risking milestone, though the core results were previously disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Strong economic indicators (NPV $1.13B, IRR 114.6%)
  • High-grade reserves (12.1 g/t Au)
  • Short payback period (0.5 years)
  • Proven and Probable reserves established

Negative factors

  • Results were previously announced in April 2026

Facts used in scoring: 2

Atlas analysis — Amex Exploration Inc.: Amex Announces Filing of Feasibility Phase 1 Technical Report for the Perron Gold Mine. proven 1989000 tonnes; probable 1989000 tonnes

Classification and evidence

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The report explicitly states Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves.

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves”

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The report explicitly states Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves.

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The technical report was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

“prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons (QPs) are named in the report.

Evidence · text

“The Qualified Persons ("QPs") for this Technical Report are the following”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (2)

provengoldTonnes: 1989000Grade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 774500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
AMX

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
1989000
Grade
12.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
774500
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold reserve reported as part of a feasibility study.

Positive factors

  • High grade (12.1 g/t)
  • Established reserve category

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 1.989 million tonnes grading 12.1 g/t gold, containing approximately 774,500 ounces of gold”
probablegoldTonnes: 1989000Grade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 774500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
AMX

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
1989000
Grade
12.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
774500
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold reserve reported as part of a feasibility study.

Positive factors

  • High grade (12.1 g/t)
  • Established reserve category

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 1.989 million tonnes grading 12.1 g/t gold, containing approximately 774,500 ounces of gold”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.