ALR: 2026 Annual Report to Shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Altair Minerals Limited
- Ticker
- ALR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Guyana
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Capital raise, Agreement transaction
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 08:39:52 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Altair Minerals Limited has reported a highly active and successful financial year, securing A$41.2 million in capital raises, including a strategic placement from Endeavour Gold Corporation. These funds are supporting an expanded 75,000m drilling program at the Greater Oko Project in Guyana, which is strategically positioned near world-class gold discoveries. The company has also reported high-grade historical drill intercepts at North Peters and promising new trench results at SOKO, alongside significant project acquisitions and expansions.
Reasoning: Altair Minerals Limited has demonstrated strong operational momentum and financial backing, securing significant capital and a strategic investor to fund an expanded, large-scale exploration program at its highly prospective Greater Oko Project. The project's location near major gold discoveries, coupled with high-grade historical and new trench results, indicates substantial potential, despite the reliance on historical data for some reported intercepts and an ongoing dispute at another project.
Positive factors
- Significant capital raises (A$13M and A$28.2M) providing substantial funding for exploration.
- Strategic investment by Endeavour Gold Corporation, a major gold producer, validating the company's potential.
- Acquisition and expansion of the Greater Oko Project in Guyana, a highly prospective gold region.
- Commencement and expansion of a large drilling program (30,000m to 75,000m) at Greater Oko.
- High-grade historical drill intercepts at North Peters and promising new trench results at SOKO.
- Project's strategic location along strike from world-class gold discoveries (Oko West, OMZ, Ghanie).
- Appointment of experienced technical team and board members, strengthening corporate governance and exploration capabilities.
Negative factors
- Many reported drill results are historical, reducing their novelty.
- All drill intercepts are reported as apparent (downhole) widths only, with no true width disclosure.
- No cut-off grades are disclosed for any reported drill intercepts.
- The Olympic Domain project faces an ongoing dispute with BHP, creating uncertainty.
- CuEq calculations for the Olympic Domain project are based on assumptions without metallurgical testwork.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 36
Classification and evidence
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The company explicitly highlights the Greater Oko Project's proximity and geological similarity to world-class discoveries like Oko West, OMZ, and Ghanie to emphasize its potential.
Evidence · text
“The Greater Oko Project lies along strike on the same Oko Shear Contact as the world-class Oko West, OMZ and Ghanie discoveries”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document presents numerous historical drill results from North Peters and Old Granny, some dating back to 1996-1998, without indicating new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Between 1996 and 1998 a total of 109 auger drill holes were completed... Some of the significant intercepts of this shallow auger drilling are shown below”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: All reported drill intercepts are given as downhole lengths without any mention of true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.
Evidence · text
“85m @ 4.81g/t Au from 24m (MM0105)”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: No cut-off grades are disclosed for any of the reported drill intercepts, making it difficult to assess the compositing methodology.
Evidence · text
“85m @ 4.81g/t Au from 24m (MM0105)”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 36. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (36)
MM0105North Peters · goldGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 85 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM0105
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 85 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 109 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM0105:24-109
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade historical gold intercept over a substantial width, indicating significant mineralization potential, though its novelty is limited as it's a re-release of old data.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (4.81 g/t Au) over a significant width (85m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“85m @ 4.81g/t Au from 24m (MM0105)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM13808North Peters · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 89 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM13808
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 89 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM13808:45-134
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows good grade over a considerable width, suggesting continuity of mineralization, but its impact is tempered by its historical nature and lack of true width/cut-off disclosure.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.40 g/t Au) over a significant width (89m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“89m @ 2.40g/t Au from 45m (MM13808)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM0106North Peters · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM0106
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 88 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 106 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM0106:18-106
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept indicates moderate grade mineralization over a substantial width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit, but with limited novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.30 g/t Au) over a significant width (88m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“88m @ 1.30g/t Au from 18m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM0106North Peters · goldGrade: 3.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM0106
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 21 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM0106:21-43
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a good width, highlighting a higher-grade core within the broader mineralization, but is historical data.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval (3.92 g/t Au) within a broader zone, indicating localized enrichment.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 22m @ 3.92g/t Au from 21m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM9407North Peters · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM9407
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM9407:0-57
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept from surface shows moderate grade over a good width, indicating near-surface mineralization, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.40 g/t Au) from surface over a significant width (57m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“57m @ 1.40g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM9407North Peters · goldGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM9407
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM9407:0-24
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade from surface, highlighting a more enriched zone within the broader mineralization, but is historical data.
Positive factors
- Good grade sub-interval (2.63 g/t Au) from surface, indicating a higher-grade zone.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 24m @ 2.63g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM13808North Peters · goldGrade: 7.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM13808
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM13808:51-75
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval represents a high-grade gold zone over a good width, indicating significant localized enrichment, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval (7.17 g/t Au) over a good width (24m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 24m @ 7.17g/t Au from 51m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 7.17 g/t over 24m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold in an open pit setting, indicating a very high-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“24m @ 7.17g/t Au”
MM4206North Peters · goldGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM4206
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM4206:55-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows good grade over a considerable width, suggesting continuity of mineralization, but its impact is tempered by its historical nature and lack of true width/cut-off disclosure.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.25 g/t Au) over a significant width (63m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“63m @ 2.25g/t Au from 55m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM4206North Peters · goldGrade: 8.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM4206
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 57 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM4206:57-68
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval represents a high-grade gold zone over a good width, indicating significant localized enrichment, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval (8.55 g/t Au) over a good width (11m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 11m @ 8.55g/t Au from 57m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 8.55 g/t over 11m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold in an open pit setting, indicating a very high-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“11m @ 8.55g/t Au”
AG-37-96North Peters · goldGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG-37-96
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG-37-96:5-16
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical auger drill intercept shows exceptionally high-grade gold over a good width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and auger sample type limit its immediate impact.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade gold intercept (33.1 g/t Au) over a good width (11m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- Auger drilling typically provides less geological confidence than diamond drilling.
Evidence · text
“AG-37-96: 11m @ 33.1g/t Au from 5m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 33.1 g/t over 11m significantly exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“11m @ 33.1g/t Au”
AG-46-96North Peters · goldGrade: 19.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG-46-96
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG-46-96:0-11
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical auger drill intercept shows exceptionally high-grade gold from surface over a good width, indicating significant near-surface mineralization, but its historical nature and auger sample type limit its immediate impact.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade gold intercept (19.1 g/t Au) from surface over a good width (11m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- Auger drilling typically provides less geological confidence than diamond drilling.
Evidence · text
“AG-46-96: 11m @ 19.1g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 19.1 g/t over 11m significantly exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“11m @ 19.1g/t Au”
AG-3-98North Peters · goldGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG-3-98
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG-3-98:0-13
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical auger drill intercept shows high-grade gold from surface over a good width, indicating significant near-surface mineralization, but its historical nature and auger sample type limit its immediate impact.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (11.4 g/t Au) from surface over a good width (13m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- Auger drilling typically provides less geological confidence than diamond drilling.
Evidence · text
“AG-3-98: 13m @ 11.4g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 11.4 g/t over 13m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“13m @ 11.4g/t Au”
AG-26-98North Peters · goldGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG-26-98
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 17 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG-26-98:0-17
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical auger drill intercept shows high-grade gold from surface over a good width, indicating significant near-surface mineralization, but its historical nature and auger sample type limit its immediate impact.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (8.5 g/t Au) from surface over a good width (17m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- Auger drilling typically provides less geological confidence than diamond drilling.
Evidence · text
“AG-26-98: 17m @ 8.5g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 8.5 g/t over 17m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“17m @ 8.5g/t Au”
MM0205North Peters · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 262 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM0205
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 262 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 292 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM0205:30-292
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows good gold grade over an exceptionally long width, indicating a very large mineralized system, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (1.6 g/t Au) over an exceptionally long width (262m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM0205: 262m @ 1.6g/t Au from 30m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM0205North Peters · goldGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM0205
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM0205:30-68
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a high gold grade over a significant width, indicating a rich zone within the broader mineralization, but is historical data.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval (8.5 g/t Au) over a significant width (38m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 38m @ 8.5g/t Au from 30m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 8.5 g/t over 38m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“38m @ 8.5g/t Au”
MMMT003North Peters · goldGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMMT003
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 43 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMMT003:0-43
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows exceptionally high-grade gold from surface over a significant width, indicating a very rich near-surface zone, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade gold intercept (10.6 g/t Au) from surface over a significant width (43m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MMMT003: 43m @ 10.6g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 10.6 g/t over 43m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“43m @ 10.6g/t Au”
MM5006North Peters · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 226 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM5006
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 226 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 226 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM5006:0-226
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows moderate gold grade from surface over an exceptionally long width, indicating a very large near-surface mineralized system, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.1 g/t Au) from surface over an exceptionally long width (226m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM5006: 226m @ 1.1g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM4106North Peters · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 109 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM4106
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 109 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 156 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM4106:47-156
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows good gold grade over a very long width, indicating a substantial mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.0 g/t Au) over a very long width (109m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM4106: 109m @ 2.0g/t Au from 47m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM39-06North Peters · goldGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM39-06
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM39-06:49-63
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows high-grade gold over a good width, indicating a significant mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (6.1 g/t Au) over a good width (14m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM39-06: 14m @ 6.1g/t Au from 49m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 6.1 g/t over 14m exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“14m @ 6.1g/t Au”
MM7407North Peters · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM7407
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM7407:54-86
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows good gold grade over a good width, indicating a mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.2 g/t Au) over a good width (32m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM7407: 32m @ 2.2g/t Au from 54m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MM17510North Peters · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 104 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM17510
- Project
- North Peters
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 104 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM17510:0-104
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical diamond drill intercept shows moderate gold grade from surface over a very long width, indicating a substantial near-surface mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.3 g/t Au) from surface over a very long width (104m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“MM17510: 104m @ 1.3g/t Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
OG1710Old Granny · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OG1710
- Project
- Old Granny
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OG1710:7-31
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows moderate grade over a good width, indicating mineralization at the Old Granny target, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.28 g/t Au) over a good width (24m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“OG1710: 24m @ 1.28g/t Au from 7m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
OG1710Old Granny · goldGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OG1710
- Project
- Old Granny
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OG1710:8-22
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade over a good width, indicating a more enriched zone within the Old Granny target, but is historical data.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold sub-interval (2.07 g/t Au) over a good width (14m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Incl. 14m @ 2.07g/t Au from 8m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
OG1810Old Granny · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OG1810
- Project
- Old Granny
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OG1810:8-18
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows moderate grade over a good width, indicating mineralization at the Old Granny target, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade gold intercept (1.35 g/t Au) over a good width (10m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“OG1810: 10m @ 1.35g/t Au from 8m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
OG3512Old Granny · goldGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OG3512
- Project
- Old Granny
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 264 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OG3512:252-264
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows good grade over a good width at a deeper level, indicating mineralization extends at depth at the Old Granny target, but its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.04 g/t Au) over a good width (12m) at depth.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“OG3512: 12m @ 2.04g/t Au from 252m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
OG1007Old Granny · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OG1007
- Project
- Old Granny
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows good grade over a moderate width, indicating mineralization at the Old Granny target, but its novelty is low and depth information is missing.
Positive factors
- Good grade gold intercept (2.24 g/t Au) over a moderate width (9m).
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- No 'from' depth specified.
Evidence · text
“Hole #1007 (9m @ 2.24g/t Au)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27South Oko · goldGrade: 10.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- South Oko
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- Guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This maiden trench result at SOKO W1 is a highly positive and novel finding, demonstrating high-grade gold mineralization and supporting the project's exploration model, despite being from trenching rather than drilling.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (10.15 g/t Au) over a good width (10m).
- New maiden trench result, indicating fresh exploration success.
- Supports the structurally controlled exploration model.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- Trench results are typically less definitive than drill results.
Evidence · text
“maiden trench results from the SOKO W1 target including 10m @ 10.15g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 10.15 g/t over 10m significantly exceeds the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.
Evidence · text
“10m @ 10.15g/t Au”
HWDD005Olympic Domain · copperGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 115 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HWDD005
- Project
- Olympic Domain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 115 m
- From
- 1095 m
- To
- 1210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1095 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HWDD005:1095-1210
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good copper equivalent grade over a significant width at depth, indicating potential for IOCG mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of metallurgical validation reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Good copper equivalent grade (0.68% CuEq) over a significant width (115m).
- Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation are disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- No metallurgical work undertaken, adding uncertainty to commercial recoveries.
Evidence · text
“HWDD005: 115m @ 0.68% CuEqi from 1095m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
HWD1Olympic Domain · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HWD1
- Project
- Olympic Domain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 61 m
- From
- 901 m
- To
- 962 m
- Intercept Depth
- 901 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HWD1:901-962
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper equivalent grade over a good width at depth, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of metallurgical validation reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper equivalent grade (0.35% CuEq) over a good width (61m).
- Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation are disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- No metallurgical work undertaken, adding uncertainty to commercial recoveries.
Evidence · text
“HWD1: 61m @ 0.35% CuEq from 901m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
HWDD008Olympic Domain · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 115 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HWDD008
- Project
- Olympic Domain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 115 m
- From
- 1040 m
- To
- 1155 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1040 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HWDD008:1040-1155
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper equivalent grade over a significant width at depth, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of metallurgical validation reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper equivalent grade (0.33% CuEq) over a significant width (115m).
- Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation are disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- No metallurgical work undertaken, adding uncertainty to commercial recoveries.
Evidence · text
“HWDD008: 115m @ 0.33% CuEq from 1040m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
HWDD005W1Olympic Domain · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HWDD005W1
- Project
- Olympic Domain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- ALR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 70 m
- From
- 962 m
- To
- 1032 m
- Intercept Depth
- 962 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HWDD005W1:962-1032
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM Zone 21N
- Loc. Source
- document
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good copper equivalent grade over a good width at depth, indicating potential for IOCG mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of metallurgical validation reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Good copper equivalent grade (0.76% CuEq) over a good width (70m).
- Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation are disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed.
- No metallurgical work undertaken, adding uncertainty to commercial recoveries.
Evidence · text
“HWDD005W1: 70m @ 0.76% CuEq from 962m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 32Greater Oko Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Oko Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- Guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This capital raise is a significant positive, providing substantial funding for the Greater Oko Project and demonstrating investor confidence in the company's exploration strategy.
Positive factors
- Significant capital raise (A$13.0 million) provides substantial funding for exploration.
- Placement at A$0.016 per share indicates market confidence.
Evidence · text
“Completion in November 2025 of a A$13.0 million investor-led institutional placement at A$0.016 per share to fund exploration and drilling activities at the Greater Oko Project.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 33Greater Oko Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Oko Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- Guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strategic placement is a highly positive and material event, bringing in substantial capital and a significant strategic partner, which strongly validates the company's projects and future prospects.
Positive factors
- Very significant capital raise (A$28.2 million) provides substantial funding.
- Strategic investment by Endeavour Gold Corporation, a major gold producer, validates the company's potential.
- Placement at a premium price (A$0.043 per share) indicates strong market and strategic investor confidence.
Evidence · text
“Completion of a strategic A$28.2 million placement to Endeavour Gold Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Endeavour Mining plc, resulting in Endeavour holding a 9.90% interest in the Company”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 34Greater Oko Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Oko Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- Guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Greater Oko Project is a highly material and positive transaction, establishing a significant landholding in a prospective gold region and forming the basis for future exploration.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of a large, prospective gold project (Greater Oko) provides significant growth potential.
- Consolidation of fragmented tenure in a highly endowed region.
Evidence · text
“On 14 October 2025, the Company announced that it had executed the Definitive Acquisition Agreement for the Greater Oko Project, initially covering approximately 590km².”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 35Irka Project · copperView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Irka Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- ALR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The option to acquire a substantial interest in the Irka Project represents a positive step for the company's copper portfolio, though the transaction is not yet finalized.
Positive factors
- Exclusive option to acquire a significant interest (80%) in a copper project in a world-class belt.
Negative factors
- Acquisition is still subject to due diligence and completion requirements.
Evidence · text
“As at 30 June 2026, Altair held 100% of the remaining 327km² of the project and an exclusive option to acquire an 80% interest in Irka Permit No. N010184917 (10km²).”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 36South Oko · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- South Oko
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- guyana
- Reported Region
- Guyana
- Ticker
- ALR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This option agreement is a positive and novel development, significantly expanding the company's footprint in a promising gold target area, which could lead to further discoveries.
Positive factors
- Securing an option for critical expansion of the South Oko landholding (29km²) enhances project scale and potential.
- Expansion is in a key target area with recent positive trench results.
Negative factors
- The option is subject to due diligence and future payments.
Evidence · text
“On 17 September 2026 the Company announced that it had entered into a binding heads of agreement (Agreement) with Henry Alphonso, Lorenzo Alphonso, Clinton Alphonso, and Vincent Thakur (collectively, Vendor Parties), who hold a 100% interest and rights to Permits securing a critical expansion to South Oko (“SOKO”), expanding its landholding across this target by 29km2 (“New Permits”).”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.