Alpha Exploration Drills 7 m Grading 7.09 g/t Gold within 19 m Grading 3.18 g/t Gold at Northeast Prospect, Aburna Gold Project

Original announcement by jmn on

Company
Alpha Exploration Ltd.
Ticker
ALEX
Exchange
TSXV
Region
Eritrea
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-06 12:30:00 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Alpha Exploration announced positive drill results from its Aburna Gold Project, including a high-grade intercept of 7m grading 7.09 g/t gold within 19m grading 3.18 g/t gold at the Northeast Prospect. The program successfully expanded the gold mineralization footprint through step-out drilling and identified new shallow zones. Additionally, first-pass drilling at the Far Southwest target returned gold mineralization, extending the prospective Aburna corridor.

Reasoning: Alpha Exploration reported strong high-grade gold intercepts from step-out drilling at the Northeast Prospect, significantly expanding the known mineralization footprint. Additionally, first-pass drilling at the Far Southwest target discovered new gold mineralization, demonstrating the project's exploration potential. The results include a new best grade for the Northeast prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • New zone discovery
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 32

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a dedicated 'QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL' section detailing independent lab analysis, certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicate samples.

Evidence · text

“QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: John Wilton CGeol FGS, CEO & Director of Alpha, is named as a 'qualified person' for the purposes of NI 43-101 and has reviewed, verified, and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

“John Wilton CGeol FGS, CEO & Director of Alpha and a "qualified person" for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The release states the nominal cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 6 metres (or 10 metres for specific intercepts) used for compositing.

Evidence · text

“A nominal cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t Au has been used to determine the boundaries of these intersections, with no more than 6 metres of internal dilution of the intercepts.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (32)

ABD030Aburna · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD030
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
76 m
To
81 m
Hole Depth
170.5 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD030:76-81
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342148
Northing
1652606
Elevation
952 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD030Aburna · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD030
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
110 m
To
125 m
Hole Depth
170.5 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD030:110-125
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342148
Northing
1652606
Elevation
952 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but represents a good width for exploration, contributing to the overall footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 15.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD030Aburna · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD030
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
120 m
To
125 m
Hole Depth
170.5 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD030:120-125
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342148
Northing
1652606
Elevation
952 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-intercept shows a higher grade within a broader zone, indicating localized mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD031Aburna · goldGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD031
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
3.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19 m
From
162 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
221.5 m
Intercept Depth
162 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD031:162-181
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342236
Northing
1652855
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong intercept of 19m at 3.18 g/t gold is significantly above the project's average grade and contributes to expanding the mineralization footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.18”

Context: 19.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD031Aburna · goldGrade: 7.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD031
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
7.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
174 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
221.5 m
Intercept Depth
162 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD031:174-181
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342236
Northing
1652855
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept of 7m at 7.09 g/t gold is exceptional for an orogenic gold deposit and significantly above the project's average, indicating strong mineralization within the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.09”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 7.09 g/t gold over 7m is exceptional for an orogenic gold deposit (open pit exceptional >=5 g/t).

Evidence · table

“7.09”

Context: 7.00

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD031Aburna · goldGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD031
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
193 m
To
197 m
Hole Depth
221.5 m
Intercept Depth
162 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD031:193-197
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342236
Northing
1652855
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept of 4m at 3.60 g/t gold contributes to the expansion of mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.60”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD032Aburna · goldGrade: 8.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD032
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
8.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
130 m
To
132 m
Hole Depth
245.2 m
Intercept Depth
130 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD032:130-132
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342311
Northing
1652849
Elevation
981 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept of 2m at 8.88 g/t gold is exceptional for an orogenic gold deposit and represents a new best grade for the Northeast prospect, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.88”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 8.88 g/t gold over 2m is exceptional for an orogenic gold deposit (open pit exceptional >=5 g/t) and is a new best grade for the Northeast prospect.

Evidence · table

“8.88”

Context: 2.00

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD032Aburna · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD032
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
207 m
To
216 m
Hole Depth
245.2 m
Intercept Depth
130 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD032:207-216
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342311
Northing
1652849
Elevation
981 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
32 m
To
44 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:32-44
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 12m at 1.53 g/t gold is a good width and near the project's average grade, contributing to the expansion of shallow mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 12.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
33 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:33-41
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-intercept of 8m at 2.22 g/t gold is above the project's average grade and contributes to the expansion of shallow mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 8.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 4.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
4.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
33 m
To
37 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:33-37
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-intercept of 4m at 4.12 g/t gold is well above the project's average grade and contributes to the expansion of shallow mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.12”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
71 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:71-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 8.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
98 m
To
101 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:98-101
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept of 3m at 2.05 g/t gold is above the project's average grade and contributes to the expansion of shallow mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD033Aburna · goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD033
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
105 m
To
107 m
Hole Depth
134.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD033:105-107
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653111
Elevation
971 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is near the project average grade and contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD034Aburna · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD034
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
200 m
To
202 m
Hole Depth
305.5 m
Intercept Depth
200 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD034:200-202
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342385
Northing
1653099
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is near the project average grade and contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD034Aburna · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD034
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
247 m
To
260 m
Hole Depth
305.5 m
Intercept Depth
200 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD034:247-260
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342385
Northing
1653099
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 13m at 1.53 g/t gold is a good width and near the project's average grade, contributing to the expansion of mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 13.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD034Aburna · goldGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD034
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
3.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
247 m
To
253 m
Hole Depth
305.5 m
Intercept Depth
200 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD034:247-253
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342385
Northing
1653099
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-intercept of 6m at 3.01 g/t gold is above the project's average grade and contributes to the expansion of mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.01”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD034Aburna · goldGrade: 2.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD034
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
2.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
268 m
To
270 m
Hole Depth
305.5 m
Intercept Depth
200 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD034:268-270
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342385
Northing
1653099
Elevation
968 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept of 2m at 2.13 g/t gold is above the project's average grade and contributes to the expansion of mineralization at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Step-out extension
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.13”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The drill holes were designed as 'step-outs' to expand the footprint of gold mineralization.

Evidence · text

“All the drill holes represent 'step-outs' from the previously interpreted edges of the drilled gold mineralization.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD035Aburna · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD035
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
156 m
To
163 m
Hole Depth
188.5 m
Intercept Depth
156 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD035:156-163
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342311
Northing
1653010
Elevation
1001 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD037Aburna · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD037
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
225 m
To
234 m
Hole Depth
245.5 m
Intercept Depth
225 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD037:225-234
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342313
Northing
1652893
Elevation
953 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABD039Aburna · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD039
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
193 m
To
214 m
Hole Depth
278.5 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD039:193-214
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342301
Northing
1652620
Elevation
957 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but represents a good width for exploration, contributing to the overall footprint at the Northeast Prospect. It is subject to a higher internal dilution limit.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 21.00*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”

Internal Dilution HigherRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: This intercept is subject to a higher maximum internal dilution of 10 metres, compared to the general 6 metres.

Evidence · text

“no more than 10 metres of internal dilution of the intercept”
ABD039Aburna · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABD039
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
193 m
To
199 m
Hole Depth
278.5 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABD039:193-199
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342301
Northing
1652620
Elevation
957 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-intercept is near the project average grade and contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect. It is subject to a higher internal dilution limit.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”

Internal Dilution HigherRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: This intercept is subject to a higher maximum internal dilution of 10 metres, compared to the general 6 metres.

Evidence · text

“no more than 10 metres of internal dilution of the intercept”
ABR192Aburna · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR192
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
22 m
To
28 m
Hole Depth
103 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR192:22-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342201
Northing
1653000
Elevation
963 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR192Aburna · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR192
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
26 m
To
28 m
Hole Depth
103 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR192:26-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342201
Northing
1653000
Elevation
963 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR194Aburna · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR194
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
3 m
To
10 m
Hole Depth
122 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR194:3-10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653171
Elevation
960 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR194Aburna · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR194
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
23 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
122 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR194:23-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653171
Elevation
960 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR194Aburna · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR194
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
23 m
To
27 m
Hole Depth
122 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR194:23-27
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653171
Elevation
960 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-intercept is near the project average grade and contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR194Aburna · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR194
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
41 m
To
62 m
Hole Depth
122 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR194:41-62
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653171
Elevation
960 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the project average grade but represents a good width for exploration, contributing to the overall footprint at the Northeast Prospect. It is subject to a higher internal dilution limit.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 21.00*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”

Internal Dilution HigherRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: This intercept is subject to a higher maximum internal dilution of 10 metres, compared to the general 6 metres.

Evidence · text

“no more than 10 metres of internal dilution of the intercept”
ABR194Aburna · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR194
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
47 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
122 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR194:47-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Northeast Prospect
Easting
342260
Northing
1653171
Elevation
960 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-intercept is below the project average grade but contributes to the overall exploration footprint at the Northeast Prospect. It is subject to a higher internal dilution limit.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Alpha expects to release more batches of results in the coming weeks and months as they are received from the laboratory"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”

Internal Dilution HigherRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: This intercept is subject to a higher maximum internal dilution of 10 metres, compared to the general 6 metres.

Evidence · text

“no more than 10 metres of internal dilution of the intercept”
ABR213Aburna · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR213
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
71 m
To
92 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR213:71-92
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Far SW Target (FSW)
Easting
339392
Northing
1650380
Elevation
937 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This first-pass intercept, while below the project average grade, represents a significant width and indicates new gold mineralization at the Far Southwest Target, extending the prospective corridor.

Positive factors

  • New zone discovery
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 21.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This intercept is located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect, indicating an extension of the mineralized system.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Nearology PlayRejected · neutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Reason: The value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit, with the intercept located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR213Aburna · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR213
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
71 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR213:71-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Far SW Target (FSW)
Easting
339392
Northing
1650380
Elevation
937 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This first-pass intercept, while below the project average grade, represents a good width and indicates new gold mineralization at the Far Southwest Target, extending the prospective corridor.

Positive factors

  • New zone discovery
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 8.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This intercept is located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect, indicating an extension of the mineralized system.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Nearology PlayRejected · neutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Reason: The value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit, with the intercept located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”
ABR213Aburna · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ABR213
Project
Aburna
Commodity
gold
Region
eritrea
Reported Region
eritrea
Ticker
ALEX

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
75 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ABR213:75-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Far SW Target (FSW)
Easting
339392
Northing
1650380
Elevation
937 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Minerals Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This first-pass intercept, while below the project average grade, indicates new gold mineralization at the Far Southwest Target, extending the prospective corridor.

Positive factors

  • New zone discovery
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed
  • Compositing transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This intercept is located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect, indicating an extension of the mineralized system.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Nearology PlayRejected · neutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Reason: The value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit, with the intercept located 1.7 km along trend from the Hill 52 prospect.

Evidence · text

“This mineralized intercept is located some 1.7 km along trend from the edge of the currently interpreted Hill 52 prospect”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths are estimated to range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections, not precisely stated for this intercept.

Evidence · text

“true widths range between 70% and 90% of the drilled intersections”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.