Almadex Expands Claim Block at New Hope, Provides Exploration Update

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Almadex Minerals Ltd.
Ticker
DEX.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Arizona, USA
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Molybdenum
Document categories
Other, Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-21 20:09:02 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Almadex has expanded its New Hope copper-gold porphyry project in Arizona through additional staking and geophysical surveys that extend the IP anomaly. The company also reviewed previous 2026 drilling results which confirmed a large porphyry alteration system with trace copper and molybdenum mineralization.

Reasoning: The release primarily announces claim expansion and geophysical updates (other), while re-releasing historical drill results from earlier in 2026 (drill_results).

Positive factors

  • Expansion of claim block and IP anomaly
  • Confirmation of large porphyry alteration system
  • Presence of tourmaline bearing breccia

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercepts (trace chalcopyrite)
  • True widths not calculable due to complex geology

Facts used in scoring: 6

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true widths are not possible to calculate due to complex veining and brecciation.

Evidence · text

“True widths are not possible to calculate at this time for the drill intercepts described”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions blanks, field duplicates, and certified standards were used.

Evidence · text

“Blanks, field duplicates and certified standards were inserted into the sample stream”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (6)

Fact 1New Hope · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
498 m
To
504 m
Intercept Depth
498 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:498.0-504.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical intercept of 0.15% Cu is considered trace mineralization for a porphyry.

Negative factors

  • Low grade (trace)

Evidence · text

“6.00 metres @ 0.15% copper”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 2New Hope · molybdenumGrade: 156Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
156
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
498 m
To
504 m
Intercept Depth
498 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:498.0-504.0

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical molybdenum grade reported alongside copper.

Evidence · text

“156 ppm molybdenum”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 3New Hope · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
500 m
To
502 m
Intercept Depth
500 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:500.0-502.0

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade sub-interval within the 6m intercept.

Evidence · text

“500.00 to 502.00 m (2.00 m) @ 0.34% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 4New Hope · molybdenumGrade: 326Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
326
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
500 m
To
502 m
Intercept Depth
500 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:500.0-502.0

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher molybdenum grade in sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“326 ppm Mo”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 5New Hope · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
778 m
To
780 m
Intercept Depth
778 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:778.0-780.0

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical intercept in tourmaline bearing breccia.

Evidence · text

“778.00 to 780.00 m (2.00 m) @ 0.14% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 6New Hope · molybdenumGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
New Hope
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
DEX.V

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
778 m
To
780 m
Intercept Depth
778 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:778.0-780.0

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical molybdenum grade reported.

Evidence · text

“5 ppm Mo”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.