Alliance Mining Reports Sampling Results from Gilbert, Fox and Wolf Veins up to 44 G/T Gold Red Rice Gold Property
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Alliance Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- ALM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Manitoba
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 12:23:59 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Alliance Mining reported high-grade gold grab sampling results from the Gilbert, Fox, and Wolf veins at the Red Rice Lake property in Manitoba. Highlights include an intercept of 44.2 g/t Au from the Gilbert vein and 16.8 g/t Au from the Wolf vein.
Reasoning: High-grade grab samples (up to 44.2 g/t Au) from multiple veins demonstrate strong exploration prospectivity in a known belt.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts
- QA/QC disclosed
- Accredited laboratory used
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 44.2 g/t Au exceeds the exceptional threshold for gold veins.
Evidence · text
“44.2 g/t from the Gilbert vein”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions an accredited laboratory (TSL/SRC) and a Qualified Person (P.Geo) sign-off.
Evidence · text
“Samples were shipped to TSL Laboratories Inc... an accredited laboratory.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
Fact 1goldGrade: 44.2Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ALM
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 44.2 g/t Au is an exceptional grade for an orogenic/vein system.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Evidence · table
“44.2”
Context: RR-21-8
Fact 2goldGrade: 6.69Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ALM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 6.69 g/t Au is a strong intercept for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · table
“6.69”
Context: RR-21-14
Fact 3goldGrade: 9.84Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ALM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 9.84 g/t Au is a strong intercept for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · table
“9.84”
Context: RR-21-15
Fact 4goldGrade: 9.36Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ALM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 9.36 g/t Au is a strong intercept for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · table
“9.36”
Context: RR-21-16
Fact 5goldGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ALM
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 16.8 g/t Au is a strong intercept for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: RR-21-21
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.