AKA: Drilling Commences at Fiddlers Creek

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Aureka Limited
Ticker
AKA
Exchange
ASX
Region
Victoria
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Lead, Zinc, Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-29 23:07:57 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aureka Limited has commenced a diamond drilling program at its Fiddlers Creek high-grade gold and silver mine in Victoria, Australia. The program aims to infill and elevate zones of mineralization, test for additional near-surface opportunities, and support underground infrastructure development. This drilling is part of Aureka's acquisition integration strategy, building on significant historical high-grade gold and silver intercepts from legacy drilling that are being reported for the first time.

Reasoning: Aureka Limited has commenced a diamond drilling program at its Fiddlers Creek high-grade gold and silver mine, targeting near-surface mineralization for infill and extension. The program is part of an acquisition integration strategy and builds on significant, newly disclosed historical high-grade intercepts, indicating strong potential for resource growth and mine life extension, despite the historical nature of the reported results and lack of original QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Drilling commenced at a high-grade gold and silver mine, indicating active development and exploration.
  • Program aims to infill and elevate zones of mineralization, supporting future underground infrastructure and extending mine life.
  • Significant high-grade historical intercepts, including bonanza grades, are highlighted, demonstrating strong potential.
  • The drilling campaign is part of a post-acquisition integration strategy, fulfilling commitments and adding value to acquired assets.
  • Competent Person sign-off for the reporting of exploration results.

Negative factors

  • All reported intercepts are historical, not new results from the current drilling program.
  • Original legacy drilling lacked formal QA/QC procedures, though a re-assay of a subset showed good correlation.
  • Intercepts are reported as down-hole lengths only, with true widths not known, which may overstate actual thickness.

Facts used in scoring: 36

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Multiple historical intercepts show exceptionally high gold grades (786.1 g/t, 134 g/t, 156 g/t) and silver grades (1600 g/t), well above the deposit-type norm for orogenic gold/silver.

Evidence · text

“0.06m @ 786.1g/t Au from 20.13m”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'All exploration is reported as down-hole lengths' and true widths are not known for the reported intercepts.

Evidence · text

“All exploration is reported as down-hole lengths.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions that 'Certified standards and blanks were routinely inserted into assay batches' for re-assays and that 'A comparison of the repeat sample showed an excellent correlation with the primary sample'.

Evidence · text

“AKA requested that a representative portion of the pulps be re-assay with QAQC. In total, 25 samples we re-submitted for assay which included two standards and one blank. A comparison of the repeat sample showed an excellent correlation with the primary sample and there were no issues with the QAQC.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program explicitly aims to 'infill and elevate zones of mineralisation' to improve confidence.

Evidence · text

“Drilling aims to infill and elevate zones of mineralisation”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The program also aims to 'test key areas for additional near surface mineralisation opportunities' and notes that 'mineralisation remains open along strike, down-plunge to the south-east, and also down dip'.

Evidence · text

“test key areas for additional near surface mineralisation opportunities”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document states that the 'Significant high-grade assay results were returned from legacy drilling and have not previously been reported in an ASX context and appear in this release for the first time,' indicating the data is historical but newly disclosed.

Evidence · text

“Significant high-grade assay results were returned from legacy drilling and have not previously been reported in an ASX context and appear in this release for the first time.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Jozef Story, a Competent Person (MAIG), has signed off on the exploration results, data quality, and geological interpretation.

Evidence · text

“Jozef Story, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) (#10079). J Story has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity currently being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.’ J Story consents to the publishing of the information in this presentation in the form and context in which it appears.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 36. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (36)

FKH01Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 27.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH01
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
27.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.19 m
From
9.07 m
To
9.26 m
Hole Depth
13.5 m
Intercept Depth
9.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH01:9.07-9.26
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711463.11
Northing
5896226.2
Elevation
298.53 m
Azimuth
70.9 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high gold grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the project's potential, though its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade (27.9 g/t) for a narrow interval.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (0.19m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“27.9”

Context: 0.19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH05Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH05
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.54 m
From
13.21 m
To
13.75 m
Hole Depth
17.4 m
Intercept Depth
13.21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH05:13.21-13.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711463.75
Northing
5896224.8
Elevation
298.48 m
Azimuth
123 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (2.26 g/t) and narrow intercept length (0.54m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 0.54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH07Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 8.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH07
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
8.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
14.6 m
To
15.35 m
Hole Depth
17.5 m
Intercept Depth
14.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH07:14.6-15.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711480.42
Northing
5896174.6
Elevation
299.47 m
Azimuth
66.9 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (8.21 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (0.75m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“8.21”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH07Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 17.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH07
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
17.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
15 m
To
15.35 m
Hole Depth
17.5 m
Intercept Depth
14.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH07:15-15.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711480.42
Northing
5896174.6
Elevation
299.47 m
Azimuth
66.9 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (17.1 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.35m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“17.1”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH08Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 40.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH08
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
40.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.19 m
From
19 m
To
20.19 m
Hole Depth
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH08:19-20.19
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711479.9
Northing
5896174
Elevation
299.48 m
Azimuth
70.4 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, which is highly positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (40.48 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.19m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“40.48”

Context: 1.19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH08Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 786.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.06 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH08
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
786.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.06 m
From
20.13 m
To
20.19 m
Hole Depth
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH08:20.13-20.19
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711479.9
Northing
5896174
Elevation
299.48 m
Azimuth
70.4 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza gold grade, indicating extremely high-grade mineralization, but its very narrow width, historical nature, and lack of original QA/QC reduce its overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade (786.1 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Extremely narrow intercept length (0.06m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“786.1”

Context: 0.06

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH13Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 4.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH13
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
4.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
28.8 m
To
29.25 m
Hole Depth
31.85 m
Intercept Depth
28.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH13:28.8-29.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711480.1
Northing
5896174
Elevation
299.49 m
Azimuth
160.8 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (4.44 g/t) and narrow intercept length (0.45m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“4.44”

Context: 0.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH14Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH14
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
42.1 m
To
46.3 m
Hole Depth
46.3 m
Intercept Depth
42.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH14:42.1-46.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711480.3
Northing
5896174
Elevation
299.53 m
Azimuth
150.3 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a moderate width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length (4.2m).
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (1.37 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 4.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH15Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 8.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH15
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
8.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Hole Depth
1.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH15:0-1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711497.6
Northing
5896183
Elevation
301.52 m
Azimuth
66.8 °
Dip
27 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature, unusual dip, and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (8.12 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.0m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.
  • Unusual positive dip (27 degrees) for a drill hole, suggesting potential for sub-parallel drilling.

Evidence · table

“8.12”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FSH01Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FSH01
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.15 m
From
44.8 m
To
44.95 m
Hole Depth
47.8 m
Intercept Depth
44.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FSH01:44.8-44.95
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711506.8
Northing
5896146
Elevation
339 m
Azimuth
334.3 °
Dip
-89.5 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (12.5 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.15m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“12.5”

Context: 0.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FSH02Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FSH02
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
20.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.25 m
From
37.55 m
To
37.8 m
Hole Depth
37.9 m
Intercept Depth
37.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FSH02:37.55-37.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711509.8
Northing
5896146
Elevation
339 m
Azimuth
333.4 °
Dip
-89.1 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (20.8 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.25m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“20.8”

Context: 0.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH06Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH06
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.18 m
From
14.6 m
To
16.78 m
Hole Depth
18.8 m
Intercept Depth
14.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH06:14.6-16.78
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711463.5
Northing
5896225
Elevation
298.46 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-36 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (1.7 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 2.18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH003Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 4.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH003
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
4.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.17 m
From
72.8 m
To
74.97 m
Hole Depth
98.9 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH003:72.8-74.97
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
72.8 °
Dip
-62.5 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (4.21 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“4.21”

Context: 2.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH003Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH003
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
13.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
73.02 m
To
73.47 m
Hole Depth
98.9 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH003:73.02-73.47
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
72.8 °
Dip
-62.5 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (13.8 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.45m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“13.8”

Context: 0.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH003Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH003
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
3.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.27 m
From
75.42 m
To
76.69 m
Hole Depth
98.9 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH003:75.42-76.69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
72.8 °
Dip
-62.5 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (3.13 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“3.13”

Context: 1.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH005Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH005
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
82.4 m
To
82.85 m
Hole Depth
95.6 m
Intercept Depth
82.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH005:82.4-82.85
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
108.3 °
Dip
-59.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (19.4 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.45m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 0.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH005Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH005
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.11 m
From
86.63 m
To
87.84 m
Hole Depth
95.6 m
Intercept Depth
82.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH005:86.63-87.84
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
108.3 °
Dip
-59.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (2.2 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 1.11

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH006Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 5.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.98 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH006
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
5.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.98 m
From
90.07 m
To
92.05 m
Hole Depth
104.8 m
Intercept Depth
90.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH006:90.07-92.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
120.8 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (5.49 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.98m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“5.49”

Context: 1.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH006Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 23.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH006
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
23.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.23 m
From
90.27 m
To
90.5 m
Hole Depth
104.8 m
Intercept Depth
90.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH006:90.27-90.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896125
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
120.8 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (23.1 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.23m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“23.1”

Context: 0.23

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH008Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 31.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH008
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
31.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.57 m
From
135.14 m
To
136.71 m
Hole Depth
143.4 m
Intercept Depth
135.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH008:135.14-136.71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
135.1 °
Dip
-65.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, which is highly positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (31.09 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.57m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“31.09”

Context: 1.57

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH008Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH008
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
134
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.26 m
From
136.45 m
To
136.71 m
Hole Depth
143.4 m
Intercept Depth
135.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH008:136.45-136.71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
135.1 °
Dip
-65.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza gold grade, indicating extremely high-grade mineralization, but its very narrow width, historical nature, and lack of original QA/QC reduce its overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade (134 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.26m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“134”

Context: 0.26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH022Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 13.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH022
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
13.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.41 m
From
5.65 m
To
7.06 m
Hole Depth
8.3 m
Intercept Depth
5.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH022:5.65-7.06
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711469.6
Northing
5896265
Elevation
320.46 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-1 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (13.77 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.41m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“13.77”

Context: 1.41

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH022Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 31.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.49 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH022
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
31.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.49 m
From
6.57 m
To
7.06 m
Hole Depth
8.3 m
Intercept Depth
5.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH022:6.57-7.06
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711469.6
Northing
5896265
Elevation
320.46 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-1 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade over a very narrow width, which is highly positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce its overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (31.1 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.49m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“31.1”

Context: 0.49

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH024Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 5.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH024
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
5.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
3.68 m
To
4.78 m
Hole Depth
6.2 m
Intercept Depth
3.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH024:3.68-4.78
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711469.3
Northing
5896264
Elevation
319.67 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-40 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (5.44 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.1m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“5.44”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH024Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH024
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.32 m
From
3.68 m
To
4 m
Hole Depth
6.2 m
Intercept Depth
3.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH024:3.68-4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711469.3
Northing
5896264
Elevation
319.67 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-40 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (11.0 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.32m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“11”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH001Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH001
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
66.45 m
To
67.95 m
Hole Depth
78.1 m
Intercept Depth
66.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH001:66.45-67.95
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.5
Northing
5896126
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
61.9 °
Dip
-50.4 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (5.0 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.5m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH001Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH001
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
67.6 m
To
67.95 m
Hole Depth
78.1 m
Intercept Depth
66.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH001:67.6-67.95
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.5
Northing
5896126
Elevation
343 m
Azimuth
61.9 °
Dip
-50.4 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (12.9 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.35m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“12.9”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH009Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH009
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
3.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
156.53 m
To
156.98 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
156.53 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH009:156.53-156.98
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
146.7 °
Dip
-54.5 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (3.88 g/t) and narrow intercept length (0.45m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“3.88”

Context: 0.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH010Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 4.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH010
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
4.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.73 m
From
185.8 m
To
186.53 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
185.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH010:185.8-186.53
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
150 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (4.61 g/t) and narrow intercept length (0.73m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“4.61”

Context: 0.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH011Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 3.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.71 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH011
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
3.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.71 m
From
120.63 m
To
121.34 m
Hole Depth
134.8 m
Intercept Depth
120.63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH011:120.63-121.34
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
113.7 °
Dip
-70.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (3.92 g/t) and narrow intercept length (0.71m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“3.92”

Context: 0.71

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH011Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH011
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.15 m
From
121.19 m
To
121.34 m
Hole Depth
134.8 m
Intercept Depth
120.63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH011:121.19-121.34
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
113.7 °
Dip
-70.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (13.2 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.15m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“13.2”

Context: 0.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH012Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 21.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.87 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH012
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
21.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.87 m
From
97.23 m
To
99.1 m
Hole Depth
110 m
Intercept Depth
97.23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH012:97.23-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, which is highly positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (21.21 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (1.87m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“21.21”

Context: 1.87

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH012Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 156Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH012
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
156
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.19 m
From
98.91 m
To
99.1 m
Hole Depth
110 m
Intercept Depth
97.23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH012:98.91-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza gold grade, indicating extremely high-grade mineralization, but its very narrow width, historical nature, and lack of original QA/QC reduce its overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade (156 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.19m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“156”

Context: 0.19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FDDH013Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 13.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDDH013
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
13.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.38 m
From
110.79 m
To
111.17 m
Hole Depth
125 m
Intercept Depth
110.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDDH013:110.79-111.17
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711472
Northing
5896065
Elevation
339.9601 m
Azimuth
65.1 °
Dip
-64.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, which is positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (13.59 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.38m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“13.59”

Context: 0.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH031Fiddlers Creek · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH031
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
23.35 m
To
23.7 m
Hole Depth
29.7 m
Intercept Depth
23.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH031:23.35-23.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896289
Elevation
359.431 m
Azimuth
65 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for an underground target, and its historical nature with limited original QA/QC reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (1.2 g/t) and very narrow intercept length (0.35m) for an underground target.
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“1.2”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

FKH031Fiddlers Creek · silverGrade: 1600Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FKH031
Project
Fiddlers Creek
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
AKA

Geometry

Grade
1600
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
23.35 m
To
23.7 m
Hole Depth
29.7 m
Intercept Depth
23.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FKH031:23.35-23.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
711464.1
Northing
5896289
Elevation
359.431 m
Azimuth
65 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a bonanza silver grade over a very narrow width, which is highly positive for an underground target, but its historical nature and lack of original QA/QC reduce confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza silver grade (1600 g/t) for an underground target.
  • Competent Person has signed off on the reporting of these historical results.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length (0.35m).
  • Intercept is historical and reported as down-hole length only, with true width unknown.
  • Original sampling lacked formal QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · table

“1600”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The flagship Irvine Project has a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource of 398koz,2 and is located 16km from the operating Staw"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.