ABx Group Limited (ASX:ABX) New Areas of Ionic Rare Earth Elements with High Extraction Discovered

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
ABx Group Limited
Ticker
ABX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Tasmania
Primary commodity
Rare earths
Secondary commodities
Dysprosium, Terbium, Neodymium, Praseodymium, Gadolinium, Holmium, Erbium, Yttrium
Document categories
Metallurgy, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-21 01:22:54 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

ABx Group has discovered new areas of high-extraction ionic adsorption clay rare earths at its Deep Leads project in Tasmania. These results, confirmed via in-house and ANSTO leach testing, suggest a substantial extent of low-cost ionic deposits and have moved the project into the development stage.

Reasoning: The discovery of new ionic clay areas with high extraction potential significantly de-risks the project economics and expands the known resource footprint.

Positive factors

  • Discovery of new ionic adsorption clay areas
  • High extraction rates (>80% reported by ANSTO)
  • Significant extension of mineralized footprint (>2km from known areas)
  • Low-cost extraction profile

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Identified new areas more than 2 km distant from previously known high extraction samples.

Evidence · text

“identified three samples with a high ionic component that are more than 2 km distant from the nearest sample that was previously known to have high extraction”

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The text refers to the 'maiden MREC produced from these bulk tests'.

Evidence · text

“The maiden MREC produced from these bulk tests”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (4)

leachrare_earthsRecovery: 80 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
rare_earths
Ticker
ABX

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
leach
Processing Route
standard low-cost process for ionic rare earths
Sample
ANSTO bulk sample

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High extraction rate for ionic clay-hosted ores.

Positive factors

  • Exceeding 80% extraction

Evidence · text

“leach tests by ANSTO on a bulk sample achieved extraction exceeding 80%”
Fact 2rare_earthsView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
rare_earths
Ticker
ABX

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Large scale resource but reported as JORC-compliant without specific M&I breakdown in text, likely heavily inferred given the 'discovery' context.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage
  • High Dy+Tb proportion

Negative factors

  • Inferred category

Evidence · text

“JORC-compliant mineral resource of 89 million tonnes at its Deep Leads - Rubble Mound and Wind Break deposits, 4 containing 36 ppm Dy+Tb”
Fact 3dysprosiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
dysprosium
Ticker
ABX

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High value heavy rare earth content in the MREC produced from bulk tests.

Positive factors

  • High grade for MREC

Evidence · text

“including 4.0% Dy and 0.7% Tb as a percentage of total rare earths”
Fact 4terbiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
terbium
Ticker
ABX

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High value heavy rare earth content in the MREC produced from bulk tests.

Positive factors

  • High grade for MREC

Evidence · text

“including 4.0% Dy and 0.7% Tb as a percentage of total rare earths”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.