AbraSilver Drilling at Diablillos Intersects 8.5 Metres at 13.81 g/t Gold at Oculto East

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
AbraSilver Resource Corp.
Ticker
ABRA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Argentina
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-21 06:24:33 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

AbraSilver Resource Corp. has announced new drill results from its Diablillos project in Argentina. The results include a high-grade gold intercept of 13.81 g/t over 8.5 metres and a broad 180 m zone grading 0.65 g/t gold, extending mineralization east of the Oculto deposit.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a high-grade gold intercept (13.81 g/t) and a broad mineralized zone (180 m), supporting the expansion of the oxide-hosted gold mineralization at the Oculto East target.

Positive factors

  • high-grade intercept
  • mineralization extension

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Results continue to expand oxide-hosted gold mineralization to the east of the Oculto deposit.

Evidence · text

“continue to expand oxide-hosted gold mineralization to the east of the Oculto deposit”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

Fact 1Diablillos · goldGrade: 13.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Diablillos
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
ABRA

Geometry

Grade
13.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Oculto East
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 13.81 g/t gold is a strong intercept for an epithermal system.

Positive factors

  • high grade

Evidence · text

“8.5 Metres at 13.81 g/t Gold at Oculto East”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 2Diablillos · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 180 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Diablillos
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
ABRA

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
180 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Oculto East
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 180 m wide zone at 0.65 g/t gold demonstrates significant mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • broad width

Evidence · text

“Broad Zone of 180 m Grading 0.65 g/t Gold”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.