Abasca Resources Releases Graphite Intersection Assays at its Loki Flake Graphite Zone Including 60 m at 9.09 % Cg.

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Abasca Resources Inc.
Ticker
ABA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Saskatchewan
Primary commodity
Graphite
Secondary commodities
Sulfur
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 09:37:45 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Abasca Resources has released assay results for fourteen drillholes from its 2024 summer exploration program at the Loki Flake Graphite Zone within its Key Lake South Project in Saskatchewan. The results include multiple wide, high-grade graphite intercepts, with several exceeding the company's previous best grade-width product. The company plans to continue delineation drilling to expand the emerging 2 km graphite zone, which remains open along strike and at depth.

Reasoning: Abasca Resources reported strong graphite drill results from its Loki Flake Graphite Zone, including several exceptional grade-width intercepts that significantly exceed prior best results. The program successfully delineated a 600m section of the zone, which remains open, and a winter program is underway to continue expansion. Robust QA/QC procedures support the data, though the presence of sulfur and lack of true width information are noted.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade-width product for graphite
  • Multiple wide, high-grade intercepts
  • Extension of mineralization along strike and at depth
  • Strong QA/QC disclosure with certified lab and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not stated
  • Presence of sulfur as a deleterious element

Facts used in scoring: 62

Atlas analysis — Abasca Resources Inc.: Abasca Resources Releases Graphite Intersection Assays at its Loki Flake Graphite Zone Including 60 m at 9.09 % Cg.. 9.09 % Cg over 60 m; 8.48 % Cg over 38 m; 7.6 % Cg over 37 m

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 62. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (62)

KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 7.27Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 37.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
7.27
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
37.7 m
From
111.5 m
To
149.2 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:111.5-149.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 37.7m at 7.27% Cg represents a strong grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“7.27”

Context: 37.70

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37.7 m
From
111.5 m
To
149.2 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:111.5-149.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 0.91% sulfur over 37.7m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 37.70

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 14.48Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
14.48
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
6 m
From
112 m
To
118 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:112.0-118.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong graphite grade of 14.48% Cg over 6m, indicating high-grade zones within the broader intercept, which is positive for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“14.48”

Context: 6.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.35Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.35
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
126 m
To
127 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:126.0-127.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 12.35% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.35”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.4
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
130.5 m
To
131 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:130.5-131.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 12.4% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.40”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.07Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.07
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
131.5 m
To
133 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:131.5-133.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 11.07% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.07”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 10.65Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
10.65
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
143.5 m
To
144.5 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:143.5-144.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 10.65% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.65”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-032Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-032
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
145 m
To
145.5 m
Hole Depth
210 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-032:145.0-145.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445266
Northing
6330455
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.6% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.60”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
2.38
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
2.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
171.7 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:169.2-171.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 2.5m at 2.38% Cg is below the 3.0% Cg cut-off grade, indicating it's likely internal dilution or a marginal zone, and is considered weak.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“2.38”

Context: 2.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
171.7 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:169.2-171.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 0.55% sulfur over 2.5m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 2.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 7.06Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
7.06
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
18 m
From
195.5 m
To
213.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:195.5-213.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 18m at 7.06% Cg represents a strong grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“7.06”

Context: 18.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18 m
From
195.5 m
To
213.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:195.5-213.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.27% sulfur over 18m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 18.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
203.5 m
To
204 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:203.5-204.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.3% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.30”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
206 m
To
207 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:206.0-207.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 10.8% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.42Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.42
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
2.5 m
From
208 m
To
210.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:208.0-210.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 2.5m at 12.42% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.42”

Context: 2.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 7.65Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
7.65
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
19.5 m
From
216 m
To
235.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:216.0-235.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 19.5m at 7.65% Cg represents a strong grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“7.65”

Context: 19.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.5 m
From
216 m
To
235.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:216.0-235.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.1% sulfur over 19.5m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 19.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.35Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.35
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
2 m
From
216 m
To
218 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:216.0-218.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 2m at 12.35% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.35”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
10.3
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
220 m
To
220.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:220.0-220.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 10.3% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.30”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
225 m
To
225.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:225.0-225.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.6% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.60”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
226 m
To
226.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:226.0-226.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.0% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-033Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-033
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
227 m
To
228.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-033:227.0-228.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445211
Northing
6330371
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 12.5% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.50”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:245.0-256.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 11m at 2.78% Cg is below the 3.0% Cg cut-off grade, indicating it's likely internal dilution or a marginal zone, and is considered weak.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“2.78”

Context: 11.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
245 m
To
256 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:245.0-256.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 0.76% sulfur over 11m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 11.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 8.15Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
8.15
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
2.35 m
From
287.65 m
To
290 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:287.65-290.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 2.35m at 8.15% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“8.15”

Context: 2.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 2.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
2.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.35 m
From
287.65 m
To
290 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:287.65-290.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 2.62% sulfur over 2.35m is a significant negative factor as this is a high sulfur grade, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is well above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present
  • High sulfur grade

Evidence · table

“2.62”

Context: 2.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
322.5 m
To
323 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:322.5-323.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 12.0% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“12.00”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
322.5 m
To
323 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:322.5-323.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.02% sulfur over 0.5m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 5.09Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
5.09
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
14 m
From
326 m
To
340 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:326.0-340.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 14m at 5.09% Cg represents a moderate grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“5.09”

Context: 14.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-035Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-035
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
326 m
To
340 m
Hole Depth
381 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-035:326.0-340.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445152
Northing
6330290
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 0.76% sulfur over 14m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 14.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 8.48Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
8.48
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
38 m
From
83.5 m
To
121.5 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:83.5-121.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 38m at 8.48% Cg represents a strong grade-width product (322.24 GT) for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“8.48”

Context: 38.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
38 m
From
83.5 m
To
121.5 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:83.5-121.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.07% sulfur over 38m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 38.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 14.55Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
14.55
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
7.5 m
From
84 m
To
91.5 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:84.0-91.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong graphite grade of 14.55% Cg over 7.5m, indicating high-grade zones within the broader intercept, which is positive for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“14.55”

Context: 7.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 17.07Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
17.07
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
3 m
From
103.5 m
To
106.5 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:103.5-106.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 3m at 17.07% Cg is an exceptional grade for graphite, indicating a very high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“17.07”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 17.07% Cg is above the exceptional threshold of 15% for graphite.

Evidence · table

“17.07”

Context: 3.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
108 m
To
108.5 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:108.0-108.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.3% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.30”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-037Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 10.5Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-037
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
10.5
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
118.5 m
To
119 m
Hole Depth
204 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-037:118.5-119.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445570
Northing
6330360
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 10.5% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.50”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
37 m
From
162.5 m
To
199.5 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:162.5-199.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 37m at 7.6% Cg represents a strong grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“7.60”

Context: 37.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37 m
From
162.5 m
To
199.5 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:162.5-199.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.26% sulfur over 37m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 37.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 13.65Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
13.65
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
163 m
To
164 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:163.0-164.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 13.65% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13.65”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.15Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.15
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
165 m
To
166 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:165.0-166.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 11.15% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.15”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.6
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
2.5 m
From
166.5 m
To
169 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:166.5-169.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 2.5m at 12.6% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.60”

Context: 2.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
171 m
To
172.5 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:171.0-172.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 12.9% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 13.63Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
13.63
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173 m
To
174.5 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:173.0-174.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 13.63% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13.63”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
13.95
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
179 m
To
180 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:179.0-180.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 13.95% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13.95”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-039Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.33Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-039
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.33
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
195 m
To
196.5 m
Hole Depth
270 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-039:195.0-196.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445513
Northing
6330281
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 12.33% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.33”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 4.25Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
4.25
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
3 m
From
207 m
To
210 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:207.0-210.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 3m at 4.25% Cg represents a moderate grade for graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“4.25”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
207 m
To
210 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:207.0-210.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.66% sulfur over 3m is a significant negative factor as this is a high sulfur grade, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is well above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present
  • High sulfur grade

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 7.54Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 28.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
7.54
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
28.5 m
From
255.5 m
To
284 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:255.5-284.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 28.5m at 7.54% Cg represents a strong grade-width product for graphite, contributing positively to the project's delineation, though true width is not stated and sulfur is present.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-width product
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“7.54”

Context: 28.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
28.5 m
From
255.5 m
To
284 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:255.5-284.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.43% sulfur over 28.5m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 28.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.55Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.55
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
255.5 m
To
256.5 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:255.5-256.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 12.55% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.55”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
15.6
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
4 m
From
257 m
To
261 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:257.0-261.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 4m at 15.6% Cg is an exceptional grade for graphite, indicating a very high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“15.60”

Context: 4.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 15.6% Cg is above the exceptional threshold of 15% for graphite.

Evidence · table

“15.60”

Context: 4.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 15.07Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
15.07
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
262 m
To
263.5 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:262.0-263.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 15.07% Cg is an exceptional grade for graphite, indicating a very high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“15.07”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 15.07% Cg is above the exceptional threshold of 15% for graphite.

Evidence · table

“15.07”

Context: 1.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
274.5 m
To
275 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:274.5-275.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.0% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-041Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-041
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
0.5 m
From
279 m
To
279.5 m
Hole Depth
312 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-041:279.0-279.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445460
Northing
6330201
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept of 0.5m at 11.4% Cg shows high-grade graphite but is too narrow to be highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.40”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 9.09Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 60 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
9.09
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
60 m
From
60 m
To
120 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:60.0-120.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 60m at 9.09% Cg is an exceptional grade-width product (545.4 GT) for graphite, significantly exceeding prior best results and indicating a substantial zone of mineralization. This is a highly material result for the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade-width product
  • Exceptional intercept length
  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Deleterious elements present

Evidence · table

“9.09”

Context: 60.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade-width product of 545.4 % Cg*m is exceptional, exceeding the 400 %*m threshold for base metals (used as proxy for graphite).

Evidence · table

“9.09”

Context: 60.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · sulfurGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
60 m
From
60 m
To
120 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:60.0-120.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of 1.27% sulfur over 60m is a negative factor as sulfur can be a deleterious element in graphite concentrates, potentially impacting processing or marketability, and is above the project average for sulfur.

Negative factors

  • Deleterious element present

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 60.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: Sulfur (S %) is reported in the assay table, indicating its presence in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“S %”

Context: Cg %

KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.91Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.91
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
7.5 m
From
64 m
To
71.5 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:64.0-71.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong graphite grade of 12.91% Cg over 7.5m, indicating high-grade zones within the broader intercept, which is positive for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.91”

Context: 7.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
72 m
To
73 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:72.0-73.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 13.2% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“13.20”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 14Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
74 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:74.0-75.0
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 14.0% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“14.00”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.35Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.35
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
75.5 m
To
76.5 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:75.5-76.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 12.35% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.35”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.4
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79 m
To
80.5 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:79.0-80.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1.5m at 12.4% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.40”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution are clearly stated for composite intervals.

Evidence · text

“Composite intervals are calculated using a 3.0 % Cg cut-off and may include a maximum of 2.0 m internal dilution.”
KLS-24-043Key Lake South Project · graphiteGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: % CgIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLS-24-043
Project
Key Lake South Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
ABA

Geometry

Grade
12.4
Grade Unit
% Cg
Intercept
1 m
From
81.5 m
To
82.5 m
Hole Depth
171 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLS-24-043:81.5-82.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
445649
Northing
6330307
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
sulfur

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept of 1m at 12.4% Cg indicates high-grade graphite, but its limited width reduces its overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.40”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that all lengths are downhole and do not represent true thickness.

Evidence · text

“All lengths are as measured downhole and do not represent true thickness.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the use of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats, and that the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited.

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected in accordance with industry-standard quality assurance / quality control practices and included the insertion of blanks, standard reference materials, and repeats into the sample stream at regular intervals.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.