A2GOLD IDENTIFIES NEW GOLD ZONE MINERALIZATION SOUTHWEST OF MCINTOSH AND EXTENDS EXISTING MINERALIZATION AT EASTSIDE
Original announcement by cnw on
- Company
- A2 Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- AUAU
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 11:47:18 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
A2Gold has completed Phase 1 RC drilling at the McIntosh Target, identifying a new gold mineralization zone in hole ES-347 and extending known mineralization in hole ES-342. The results confirm the effectiveness of using magnetic low anomalies for targeting within the Eastside Gold-Silver Project.
Reasoning: The program successfully identified a new gold zone (ES-347) and extended existing mineralization (ES-342), validating geophysical targeting, though grades are relatively low (0.20-0.23 g/t Au).
Positive factors
- Step-Out Extension
- Discovery of new zone
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Hole ES-347 discovered a new zone 370m southwest and ES-342 extended mineralization 86m southeast.
Evidence · text
“representing the discovery of a new zone of gold mineralization approximately 370 metres southwest of the current McIntosh resource”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions certified reference materials, blanks, and field duplicates, and names an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The RC drilling program included the routine insertion of certified reference materials, blanks, and field duplicates”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Reported intervals represent downhole drilled lengths; true widths have not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals represent downhole drilled lengths; true widths have not yet been determined.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
ES-347s broader Eastside exploration strategy of expanding known mineralization while also testing structural and geophysical targets that may represent higher-grade feeder zones within the broader epithermal · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ES-347
- Project
- s broader Eastside exploration strategy of expanding known mineralization while also testing structural and geophysical targets that may represent higher-grade feeder zones within the broader epithermal
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- AUAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 65.5 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 318.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ES-347:253-318.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- McIntosh Target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Discovery of a new gold zone 370m southwest of the existing resource, though reported as downhole length without true width.
Positive factors
- Step-Out Extension
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · text
“ES-347 intersected 0.23 g/t gold over 65.5 metres beginning at 253.0 metres downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
ES-342Eastside Gold–Silver · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ES-342
- Project
- Eastside Gold–Silver
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- AUAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 214.9 m
- To
- 246.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ES-342:214.9-246.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- McIntosh Target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Extends known McIntosh mineralization by 86m southeast, providing a target for further extension.
Positive factors
- Step-Out Extension
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · text
“ES-342 intersected 0.20 g/t gold over 32.0 metres beginning at 214.9 metres downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.