# 1911 Gold Reports Strong Metallurgical Results From Manitoba Projects

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b

Original source: https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects/

Publisher: canadianminingjournal

Original announcement: 2026-08-20T16:31:22.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: 1911 Gold

- Ticker: AUMB

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Manitoba

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-08-20 19:14:40 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

1911 Gold has reported strong metallurgical test results for its True North and Ogama-Rockland gold projects in Manitoba. True North showed high leach recoveries of 95.5%, while Ogama-Rockland achieved 97.7% recovery via leaching reground flotation concentrate.

Reasoning: Strong metallurgical recoveries \(up to 97.7% leach\) reported for two key projects, supporting project economics.

- Positive factor: High leach recoveries reported at both projects

- Positive factor: Gravity recovery stage is effective at True North

- Positive factor: Ogama-Rockland material described as clean and amenable to True North mill

Facts used in scoring: 5

## Classification and evidence

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Leach recoveries of 95.5% and 97.7% are at or above the exceptional band for gold.

Evidence · text

> leach recovery averaged 95.5% gold

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: Results involve gravity, flotation, and leaching, typical of a mill circuit.

Evidence · text

> amenable to high recoveries at the True North mill

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Metallurgical Results (5)

### gravity

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b#fact-metallurgical-facts-0)

True North · gold

#### Identity

- Project: True North
- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Test Work

- Test Type: gravity
- Sample: True North 130 kg sample

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 51 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 1.82
- Head Grade Unit: g/t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 51% gravity recovery is a significant component of the True North flowsheet.

- Positive factor: Significant gold recovered through gravity stage

Evidence · text

> Gravity recovery averaged 51.0% gold

### flotation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b#fact-metallurgical-facts-1)

True North · gold

#### Identity

- Project: True North
- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Test Work

- Test Type: flotation
- Sample: True North 130 kg sample

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 44.5 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 1.82
- Head Grade Unit: g/t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Flotation recovery of 44.5% provides the concentrate for subsequent leaching.

Evidence · text

> flotation recovery 44.5% gold

### leach

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b#fact-metallurgical-facts-2)

True North · gold

#### Identity

- Project: True North
- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Test Work

- Test Type: leach
- Sample: True North 130 kg sample

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 95.5 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 1.82
- Head Grade Unit: g/t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 95.5% leach recovery is exceptional for gold.

- Positive factor: Excellent gold recoveries

Evidence · text

> leach recovery averaged 95.5% gold

### gravity

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b#fact-metallurgical-facts-3)

Ogama-Rockland · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Ogama-Rockland
- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Test Work

- Test Type: gravity
- Sample: Ogama-Rockland composite sample

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 82 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 4.65
- Head Grade Unit: g/t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 82% gravity recovery is strong for preliminary work.

Evidence · text

> gold recovery of 82.0% by gravity concentration

### leach

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-reports-strong-metallurgical-results-from-manitoba-projects--6f5848a4-1f67-46fe-b337-0eb606bf6d1b#fact-metallurgical-facts-4)

Ogama-Rockland · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Ogama-Rockland
- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Test Work

- Test Type: leach
- Sample: Ogama-Rockland reground flotation concentrate

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 97.7 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 4.65
- Head Grade Unit: g/t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 97.7% recovery is exceptional.

- Positive factor: High recoveries confirmed

Evidence · text

> 97.7% by leaching the reground flotation concentrate

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
