1911 Gold Reports High Gold Recoveries From True North And Ogama Rockland Test Work
Original announcement by proactiveinvestors on
- Company
- 1911 Gold Corp
- Ticker
- AUMB
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Manitoba
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 16:04:24 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
1911 Gold Corp reported high gold recoveries from metallurgical test work at its True North and Ogama-Rockland projects in Manitoba. True North achieved 93.7% recovery, while Ogama-Rockland achieved 96.3% recovery using a gravity-flotation-regrind-leach flowsheet.
Reasoning: The announcement reports high gold recoveries (93.7% and 96.3%) across two different projects, which is highly material for project economics.
Positive factors
- High gold recoveries reported at both projects
- Gravity concentration is effective
- Low acid generation potential
- Moderate reagent consumption
Negative factors
- Preliminary results for Ogama-Rockland require further variability testing
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Gold recoveries of 93.7% and 96.3% are well above the exceptional threshold for gold.
Evidence · text
“reported metallurgical test results showing gold recoveries of 93.7%... and 96.3%”
Free Millingpositive
Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.
Why it applies: Environmental testing indicated no potential for acid generation or deleterious metal leaching.
Evidence · text
“Environmental testing indicated no potential for acid generation or measurable deleterious metal leaching.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Metallurgical Results (2)
gravity, flotation, leachgoldRecovery: 93.7 %Head Grade: 1.82Head Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- AUMB
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- gravity, flotation, leach
- Processing Route
- gravity, flotation, leach
- Sample
- True North Gold Project, L10 Zone on Level 16, 130-kg sample
Recovery
- Recovery
- 93.7 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Head Grade
- 1.82
- Head Grade Unit
- g/t
Reagents
- Reagent Notes
- 51% recovered through gravity concentration; 44.5% to flotation concentrate; leaching of reground flotation concentrate averaged 95.5% recovery; moderate reagent consumptions
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 93.7% recovery is strong for a gold project.
Positive factors
- High total recovery
- Effective gravity recovery
Evidence · text
“gold recoveries of 93.7% from a sample at its True North Gold Project”
gravity-flotation-regrind-leachgoldRecovery: 96.3 %Head Grade: 4.65Head Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- AUMB
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gravity-flotation-regrind-leach
- Processing Route
- gravity, flotation, regrind, leach
- Sample
- Ogama-Rockland Gold Project, composite drill-core sample
- Grind P80
- 101 µm
- Leach Time
- 72 hours
Recovery
- Recovery
- 96.3 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Head Grade
- 4.65
- Head Grade Unit
- g/t
Reagents
- Reagent Notes
- Gravity concentration recovered 82% of the gold; leaching of the reground flotation concentrate recovered 97.7% of the gold captured in that concentrate; nominal primary grind of 101 microns and a regrind of 21 microns
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Excellent recovery results, though noted as preliminary.
Positive factors
- Very high recovery (96.3%)
- Strong gravity recovery
Negative factors
- Preliminary results require more variability testing
Evidence · text
“96.3% from preliminary testing on material from its Ogama-Rockland Gold Project”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.