1911 Gold Intersects up to 24.83 g/t Gold over 2.60 m on San Antonio West at the True North Gold Project
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- 1911 Gold Corporation
- Ticker
- AUMB
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Manitoba, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 04:34:00 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
1911 Gold Corporation has announced new assay results from its surface drill program at the True North Gold Project in Manitoba. The results include a high-grade gold intercept of 24.83 g/t over 2.60 m at the San Antonio West target.
Reasoning: The announcement reports a high-grade gold intercept of 24.83 g/t over 2.60 m, which is significant for an exploration-stage project.
Positive factors
- high-grade gold intercept
Facts used in scoring: 1
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 24.83 g/t gold is a high-grade intercept for an exploration program.
Evidence · text
“24.83 g/t Gold”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (1)
Fact 1True North Gold Project · goldGrade: 24.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- True North Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba, Canada
- Ticker
- AUMB
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 24.83 g/t gold is a strong intercept for an exploration program.
Positive factors
- exceptional grade
Evidence · text
“24.83 g/t Gold over 2.60 m”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.