1911 Gold Extends Trends At True North

Original announcement by canadianminingjournal on

Company
1911 Gold
Ticker
AUMB
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Manitoba
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-20 19:13:38 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

1911 Gold has released new drill results from its True North gold project in Manitoba, highlighting high-grade gold intercepts at the SAM SE, Baker, and Shore targets. The drilling confirms mineralization continuity over a 720-metre strike length and supports resource definition efforts.

Reasoning: Strong high-grade gold intercepts (up to 36.44 g/t) across multiple targets (SAM SE, Baker, Shore) demonstrating strike and depth extensions.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts reported
  • Mineralization extension demonstrated
  • Resource definition drilling underway

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Work at Shore pushed the 007 shear zone farther down, proving the structure carries gold below previous known limits.

Evidence · text

“Work at Shore pushed the 007 shear zone farther down, proving the structure carries gold below previous known limits.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The company drilled 10 underground holes totalling 3,560 metres for resource definition.

Evidence · text

“drilled 10 underground holes totalling 3,560 metres for resource definition.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

TN26094True North · goldGrade: 15.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN26094
Project
True North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_mb
Reported Region
Manitoba
Ticker
AUMB

Geometry

Grade
15.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
59 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 15.89 g/t over 2.7m is a strong intercept for an underground/vein system.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Evidence · text

“TN26094 intersected 15.89 grams per tonne of gold over 2.7 metres at a depth of 59 metres downhole.”
TN26076True North · goldGrade: 36.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN26076
Project
True North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_mb
Reported Region
Manitoba
Ticker
AUMB

Geometry

Grade
36.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
411.1 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 36.44 g/t is an exceptional grade, though the interval is narrow at 1.1m.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Narrow width

Evidence · text

“TN26076 returned 36.44 grams per tonne of gold over 1.1 metres at 411.1 metres downhole depth.”
TN26088True North · goldGrade: 5.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN26088
Project
True North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_mb
Reported Region
Manitoba
Ticker
AUMB

Geometry

Grade
5.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
230.5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 5.99 g/t over 4.9m is a moderate/strong intercept for this deposit type.

Positive factors

  • Solid gold grade

Evidence · text

“TN26088 intersected 5.99 grams per tonne of gold over 4.9 metres at a depth of 230.5 metres.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.