# 1911 Gold Announces Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Ogama-Rockland Gold Project 1911 Gold Corporation \("1911 Gold" or the "Company"\) \(TSXV: AUMB\) \(OTCQX: AUMBF\) \(FRA: 2KY\) is pleased to report an updated underground Mineral...

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-update-for-the-ogama-rockland-gold--0c7a8733-714e-48ca-8912-4ad8917eff87

Original source: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/1911-gold-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-update-for-the-ogama-rockland-gold-project-302847659.html

Publisher: prnewswire

Original announcement: 2026-08-18T17:16:53.280Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: 1911 Gold Corporation

- Ticker: AUMB

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Manitoba, Canada

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-08-24 04:21:50 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

1911 Gold Corporation has announced an updated Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for its Ogama-Rockland Gold Project, totaling 3.31 million tonnes at 6.68 g/t gold for 712,000 contained ounces. The estimate, which is entirely in the Inferred category, highlights the project's high-grade profile and significant resource base, with potential for expansion along strike and down-dip. The company plans additional drilling in Q4/2026 to test these expansion areas.

Reasoning: The updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Ogama-Rockland reports a substantial Inferred gold resource of 712,000 ounces at a high grade of 6.68 g/t, indicating significant potential for the project with planned drilling to expand the resource, despite the lower confidence associated with the Inferred category.

- Positive factor: High-grade

- Positive factor: Significant contained metal

- Positive factor: Potential for resource expansion

- Positive factor: QP sign-off

- Positive factor: CIM compliant

- Positive factor: Detailed cut-off grade assumptions

- Positive factor: Underground mining method implied

- Negative factor: Entirely Inferred resource

- Negative factor: Uncertainty inherent in Inferred classification

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource is classified as Inferred, which is the lowest confidence category.

Evidence · table

> Inferred Resources

Context: 3,314,000

**All Inferred**

Polarity: negative

Definition: 100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is comprised solely of Inferred Mineral Resources, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · text

> The 2026 MRE consists of Inferred Mineral Resources

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The MRE was completed and approved by Tim Maunula, P.Geo., an Independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

> The 2026 MRE was completed by Tim Maunula, P.Geo. of T. Maunula &amp; Associates Consulting Inc., Chatham, Ontario, Canada, who is an Independent Qualified Person \("QP"\) under NI 43-101 standards.

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 2.50 g/t Au used for the resource estimate is clearly stated along with its economic assumptions.

Evidence · table

> 2.50 g/t Au

Context: The 2026 MRE uses a cut-off grade of 2.50 g/t Au based on assumptions of a gold price of US$2,500/oz, an exchange rate of US$/C$ 0.72, mining operating costs of C$175.00/t, processing costs of C$38.00/t processed, haulage costs of $15.20/t mined, G&amp;A of C$37.00/t processed and average gold recoverability of 94%.

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The MRE follows the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines, which are consistent with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · table

> The 2026 MRE follows the November 29, 2019, CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines.

Context: The effective date of the 2026 MRE is August 6, 2026, and is based upon all exploration data available up to April 20, 2026.

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the project.

Evidence · text

> 1911 Gold Announces Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Ogama-Rockland Gold Project

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The average gold recoverability of 94% used in the economic assumptions for the cut-off grade is high.

Evidence · table

> average gold recoverability of 94%

Context: The 2026 MRE uses a cut-off grade of 2.50 g/t Au based on assumptions of a gold price of US$2,500/oz, an exchange rate of US$/C$ 0.72, mining operating costs of C$175.00/t, processing costs of C$38.00/t processed, haulage costs of $15.20/t mined, G&amp;A of C$37.00/t processed and average gold recoverability of 94%.

**High Grade**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The Inferred resource grade of 6.68 g/t Au is strong for an underground gold project, exceeding the 4 g/t threshold for strong underground gold grades.

Evidence · table

> 6.68

Context: 3,314,000

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/1911-gold-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-update-for-the-ogama-rockland-gold--0c7a8733-714e-48ca-8912-4ad8917eff87#fact-resource-facts-0)

Ogama-Rockland · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Ogama-Rockland
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba, Canada
- Ticker: AUMB

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 3314000
- Grade: 6.68
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 712000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 2.5

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Ogama-Rockland reports a substantial Inferred gold resource of 712,000 ounces at a high grade of 6.68 g/t, indicating significant potential for the project with planned drilling to expand the resource, despite the lower confidence associated with the Inferred category.

- Positive factor: High-grade

- Positive factor: Significant contained metal

- Positive factor: Potential for resource expansion

- Positive factor: QP sign-off

- Positive factor: CIM compliant

- Positive factor: Detailed cut-off grade assumptions

- Positive factor: Underground mining method implied

- Negative factor: Entirely Inferred resource

- Negative factor: Uncertainty inherent in Inferred classification

Evidence · table

> 6.68

Context: 3,314,000

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
