# 10X Commences Exploration with Key Land Access Granted                                                                                                                  20 										                                             pages                                                                                       									                                                                                                                          2.0MB

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03041529

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-01T04:29:16.677Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-01T04:29:16.677Z

- Company: Exultant Mining Limited

- Ticker: 10X

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: New South Wales

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc

- Document categories: Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other

- Extracted: 2026-10-01 04:29:17 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Exultant Mining Limited has provided an update on its Peak View Project in New South Wales, announcing the successful securing of multiple Land Access Agreements and the completion of historical data compilation. The company has collected 16 rock chip samples from various prospects, including the Big Badja Silver Mine and Undoo Creek, with assay results expected in early Q1 2026. This work paves the way for a planned drilling campaign in Q2-Q3 2026, following further soil sampling and geophysical surveys.

Reasoning: Exultant Mining has successfully secured land access and compiled historical data, laying the groundwork for future exploration and drilling at the Peak View Project. While no new assay results are presented, these are positive steps for project advancement.

- Positive factor: Land access secured for priority areas

- Positive factor: Comprehensive compilation of historical data completed

- Positive factor: Future exploration programs and drilling campaign planned

- Negative factor: No new assay results reported in this announcement

- Negative factor: Reliance on historical data with documented QA/QC issues

- Negative factor: True width of historical intercepts is not known

Facts used in scoring: 78

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (74)

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-4)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 114
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(114 g/t Ag\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 114.0

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-5)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.17
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.17 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.17

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-6)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.08
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(3.08% Cu\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.08

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-7)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.28
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical lead grade \(8.28% Pb\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 8.28

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-8)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 36
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(36 g/t Ag\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 36.0

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-9)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.46
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.46 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.46

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-10)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.10% Cu\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.10

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-11)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 31
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.2 m
- From: 25 m
- To: 25.2 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(31 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 31.0

Context: 0.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-12)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.2 m
- From: 25 m
- To: 25.2 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.25 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.25

Context: 0.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-13)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 95
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.7 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 164.8 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(95 g/t Ag\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 95.0

Context: 0.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-14)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.7 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 164.8 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(2.60% Cu\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.60

Context: 0.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-15)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.09
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.7 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 164.8 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(2.09% Pb\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.09

Context: 0.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-16)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 269
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical silver grade \(269 g/t Ag\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 269.0

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-17)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.75
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.75 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.75

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-18)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.82
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical lead grade \(3.82% Pb\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.82

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-19)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.74
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate zinc grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical zinc grade \(7.74% Zn\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.74

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-20)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 63
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(63 g/t Ag\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 63.0

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-21)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.12
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.12 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.12

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-22)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.63
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical copper grade \(0.63% Cu\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.63

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-23)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.51
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(1.51% Pb\) over a narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.51

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-24)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 90
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(90 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 90.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-25)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.05 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-26)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(3.40% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.40

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-27)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.39
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(1.39% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.39

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-28)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical zinc grade \(3.60% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.60

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-29)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 70
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(70 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 70.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-30)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.05 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-31)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.55
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.55% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.55

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-32)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.61
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(1.61% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.61

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-33)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical zinc grade \(4.50% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-34)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 70
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(70 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 70.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-35)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.3
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical gold grade \(2.3 g/t Au\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.30

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-36)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.56
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.56% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.56

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-37)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical lead grade \(4.20% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-38)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 80
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(80 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 80.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-39)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.05 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-40)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.53
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.53% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.53

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-41)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.83
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(1.83% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.83

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-42)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical zinc grade \(4.90% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-43)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 100
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(100 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 100.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-44)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.15
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.15 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.15

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-45)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.79
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.79% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.79

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-46)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical lead grade \(7.40% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.40

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-47)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical zinc grade \(6.90% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 6.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-48)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 110
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(110 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 110.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-49)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.10 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-50)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.76
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.76% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.76

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-51)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(4.50% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-52)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.3
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical zinc grade \(10.30% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 10.30

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-53)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 140
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(140 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 140.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-54)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.10 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-55)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(2.80% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.80

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-56)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical lead grade \(2.20% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-57)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical zinc grade \(6.10% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 6.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-58)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 100
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(100 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 100.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-59)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.10 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-60)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.39
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.39% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.39

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-61)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical lead grade \(7.80% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.80

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-62)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 22
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical zinc grade \(22.00% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 22.00

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-63)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 190
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33 m
- To: 33.1 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(190 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 190.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-64)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33 m
- To: 33.1 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.25 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.25

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-65)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.71
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33 m
- To: 33.1 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.71% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.71

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-66)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 11.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33 m
- To: 33.1 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical lead grade \(11.90% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 11.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-67)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 22
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33 m
- To: 33.1 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical zinc grade \(22.00% Zn\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 22.00

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-68)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 110
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.1 m
- To: 33.2 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(110 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 110.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-69)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 9.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.1 m
- To: 33.2 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(9.50% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 9.50

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-70)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 17.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.1 m
- To: 33.2 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical lead grade \(17.90% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 17.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-71)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 110
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.2 m
- To: 33.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Moderate historical silver grade \(110 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 110.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-72)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.2 m
- To: 33.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical copper grade \(10.90% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 10.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-73)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 18.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.2 m
- To: 33.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional historical lead grade \(18.20% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 18.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-74)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 90
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.3 m
- To: 33.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Weak historical silver grade \(90 g/t Ag\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 90.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-75)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.2
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.3 m
- To: 33.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Negative factor: Weak historical gold grade \(0.20 g/t Au\) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-76)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.06
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.3 m
- To: 33.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical copper grade \(1.06% Cu\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.06

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/10x-commences-exploration-with-key-land-access-granted-20-pages-2-0mb--ad96b688-3aa5-4dbd-b004-3a69edbc694f#fact-drill-facts-77)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 33.3 m
- To: 33.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Peak View
- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG: 28355
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: No
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

- Positive factor: Strong historical lead grade \(7.60% Pb\) over a very narrow interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification

- Negative factor: True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness

- Negative factor: QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.60

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
