10X Commences Exploration with Key Land Access Granted 20 pages 2.0MB

Original announcement by asx on Dec 16, 2025

Bullish

Company: Exultant Mining Limited
Ticker: 10X
Exchange: ASX
Region: New South Wales
Primary commodity: Silver
Secondary commodities: Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories: Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
Extracted: 2026-10-01 04:29:17 UTC

Atlas analysis published: Oct 1, 2026

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Exultant Mining Limited has provided an update on its Peak View Project in New South Wales, announcing the successful securing of multiple Land Access Agreements and the completion of historical data compilation. The company has collected 16 rock chip samples from various prospects, including the Big Badja Silver Mine and Undoo Creek, with assay results expected in early Q1 2026. This work paves the way for a planned drilling campaign in Q2-Q3 2026, following further soil sampling and geophysical surveys.

Reasoning: Exultant Mining has successfully secured land access and compiled historical data, laying the groundwork for future exploration and drilling at the Peak View Project. While no new assay results are presented, these are positive steps for project advancement.

Positive factors

Land access secured for priority areas
Comprehensive compilation of historical data completed
Future exploration programs and drilling campaign planned

Negative factors

No new assay results reported in this announcement
Reliance on historical data with documented QA/QC issues
True width of historical intercepts is not known

Facts used in scoring: 78

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (74)

PV001Peak View · silverGrade: 114Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 114
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.5 m
From: 78.7 m
To: 79.2 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (114 g/t Ag) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“114.0”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.5 m
From: 78.7 m
To: 79.2 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.17 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 3.08
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.5 m
From: 78.7 m
To: 79.2 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (3.08% Cu) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · leadGrade: 8.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 8.28
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.5 m
From: 78.7 m
To: 79.2 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical lead grade (8.28% Pb) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“8.28”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 36
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 79.2 m
To: 80 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (36 g/t Ag) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“36.0”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.46
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 79.2 m
To: 80 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.46 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV001
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.1
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 79.2 m
To: 80 m
Hole Depth: 109.5 m
Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713372
Northing: 6007277
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 270 °
Dip: -60 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.10% Cu) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 31
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.2 m
From: 25 m
To: 25.2 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (31 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“31.0”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.25
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.2 m
From: 25 m
To: 25.2 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, which is below typical economic thresholds for underground mining, and the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.25 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 95
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.7 m
From: 164.1 m
To: 164.8 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (95 g/t Ag) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“95.0”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 2.6
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.7 m
From: 164.1 m
To: 164.8 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (2.60% Cu) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“2.60”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 2.09
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.7 m
From: 164.1 m
To: 164.8 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (2.09% Pb) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“2.09”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 269Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 269
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 164.8 m
To: 165.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical silver grade (269 g/t Ag) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“269.0”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.75
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 164.8 m
To: 165.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.75 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 3.82
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 164.8 m
To: 165.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical lead grade (3.82% Pb) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · zincGrade: 7.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 7.74
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.8 m
From: 164.8 m
To: 165.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate zinc grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical zinc grade (7.74% Zn) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“7.74”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 63
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 1 m
From: 165.5 m
To: 166.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (63 g/t Ag) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“63.0”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.12
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 1 m
From: 165.5 m
To: 166.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.63
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 165.5 m
To: 166.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate copper grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical copper grade (0.63% Cu) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PV002
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.51
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 165.5 m
To: 166.5 m
Hole Depth: 181.5 m
Intercept Depth: 25 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713368
Northing: 6007269
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 998 m
Azimuth: 0 °
Dip: -90 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (1.51% Pb) over a narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 90
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.2 m
To: 32.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (90 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“90.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.05
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.2 m
To: 32.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.05 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 3.4
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.2 m
To: 32.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (3.40% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“3.40”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.39
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.2 m
To: 32.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (1.39% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 3.6
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.2 m
To: 32.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical zinc grade (3.60% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“3.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 70
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.3 m
To: 32.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (70 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“70.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.05
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.3 m
To: 32.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.05 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.55
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.3 m
To: 32.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.55% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.61
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.3 m
To: 32.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (1.61% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 4.5
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.3 m
To: 32.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical zinc grade (4.50% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 70
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.4 m
To: 32.5 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (70 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“70.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 2.3
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.4 m
To: 32.5 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak gold grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical gold grade (2.3 g/t Au) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.56
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.4 m
To: 32.5 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.56% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 4.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.4 m
To: 32.5 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical lead grade (4.20% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“4.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 80Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 80
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.5 m
To: 32.6 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (80 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“80.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.05
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.5 m
To: 32.6 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.05 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.53
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.5 m
To: 32.6 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.53% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.83
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.5 m
To: 32.6 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (1.83% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.83”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 4.9
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.5 m
To: 32.6 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical zinc grade (4.90% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“4.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 100
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.6 m
To: 32.7 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (100 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.15
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.6 m
To: 32.7 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.15 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.79
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.6 m
To: 32.7 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.79% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.79”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 7.4
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.6 m
To: 32.7 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical lead grade (7.40% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“7.40”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 6.9
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.6 m
To: 32.7 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a moderate zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Moderate historical zinc grade (6.90% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“6.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 110
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.7 m
To: 32.8 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (110 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.7 m
To: 32.8 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.10 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.76
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.7 m
To: 32.8 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.76% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.76”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 4.5
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.7 m
To: 32.8 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (4.50% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 10.3
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.7 m
To: 32.8 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical zinc grade (10.30% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“10.30”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 140
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.8 m
To: 32.9 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (140 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“140.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.8 m
To: 32.9 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.10 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 2.8
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.8 m
To: 32.9 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (2.80% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 2.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.8 m
To: 32.9 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical lead grade (2.20% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 6.1
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.8 m
To: 32.9 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical zinc grade (6.10% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“6.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 100
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.9 m
To: 33 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (100 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.9 m
To: 33 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.10 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.39
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.9 m
To: 33 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.39% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 7.8
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.9 m
To: 33 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical lead grade (7.80% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“7.80”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 22
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 32.9 m
To: 33 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional zinc grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Exceptional historical zinc grade (22.00% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“22.00”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 190Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 190
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33 m
To: 33.1 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (190 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“190.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.25
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33 m
To: 33.1 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.25 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.71
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33 m
To: 33.1 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.71% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.71”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 11.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 11.9
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33 m
To: 33.1 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned an exceptional lead grade over a very narrow interval, indicating significant past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Exceptional historical lead grade (11.90% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“11.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: zinc
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 22
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33 m
To: 33.1 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical zinc grade (22.00% Zn) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“22.00”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 110
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.1 m
To: 33.2 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (110 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 9.5
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.1 m
To: 33.2 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (9.50% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“9.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 17.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 17.9
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.1 m
To: 33.2 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical lead grade (17.90% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“17.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 110
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.2 m
To: 33.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Moderate historical silver grade (110 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 10.9
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.2 m
To: 33.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical copper grade (10.90% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“10.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 18.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 18.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.2 m
To: 33.3 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Exceptional historical lead grade (18.20% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“18.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 90
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.3 m
To: 33.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 30
Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a weak silver grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Weak historical silver grade (90 g/t Ag) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“90.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: ppm
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.3 m
To: 33.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

Weak historical gold grade (0.20 g/t Au) below typical economic thresholds for underground mining
Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 1.06
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.3 m
To: 33.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drilling at Peak View returned a strong copper grade over a very narrow interval, indicating past mineralization, but the data is old and lacks modern verification and true width.

Positive factors

Strong historical copper grade (1.06% Cu) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: PVD003
Project: Peak View
Commodity: lead
Region: australia_nsw
Reported Region: australia_nsw
Ticker: 10X

Geometry

Grade: 7.6
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 0.1 m
From: 33.3 m
To: 33.4 m
Hole Depth: 118.5 m
Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Peak View
Easting: 713351
Northing: 6007164
CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG: 28355
Elevation: 988 m
Azimuth: 255 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: No
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 3
Cutoff Unit: % Zn+Pb
Max Dilution: 0.2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

Strong historical lead grade (7.60% Pb) over a very narrow interval

Negative factors

Result is historical and from 1978, lacking modern verification
True width is not known, potentially overstating thickness
QA/QC protocols for historical data are not consistently documented

Evidence · table

“7.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.