# 05:02 ET RAMINVEST HOLDING Advances Mauritania Gold Exploration Following 50.14 g/t Gold Assays at Wompou Project RAMINVEST HOLDING today announced the next phase of its Mauritania gold exploration programme at the Wompou Gold Project, where sampling returned...

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/05-02-et-raminvest-holding-advances-mauritania-gold-exploration-following-50-14--50330087-1c47-4c76-ae56-da435b290699

Original source: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/raminvest-holding-advances-mauritania-gold-exploration-following-50-14-gt-gold-assays-at-wompou-project-302874199.html

Publisher: prnewswire

Original announcement: 2026-09-10T09:45:50.891Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: RAMINVEST HOLDING

- Ticker: Unavailable

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Mauritania

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Arsenic

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-10 09:46:53 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

RAMINVEST HOLDING has identified six priority targets \(T-01 to T-06\) at the Wompou Gold Project in Mauritania following sampling results of up to 50.14 g/t gold. The company noted a strong correlation between gold and arsenic, which will be used as a pathfinder for the next phase of targeted drilling.

Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade gold sampling \(50.14 g/t\) and the definition of six new targets, which provides a strong basis for upcoming drilling, though actual drill intercepts are not yet reported.

- Positive factor: High grade assay results

- Positive factor: Clear target definition \(T-01 to T-06\)

- Positive factor: Strong pathfinder correlation \(arsenic-gold\)

- Negative factor: No drill hole IDs or specific intercepts provided

- Negative factor: Sampling results only \(no drilling yet\)

- Negative factor: Deleterious element \(arsenic\) noted as a pathfinder

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 50.14 g/t gold exceeds the exceptional threshold for gold exploration.

Evidence · text

> up to 50.14 g/t gold

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: The release mentions a strong arsenic-gold correlation, indicating arsenic is present in the mineralized system.

Evidence · text

> identified a strong arsenic-gold correlation \(R = 0.989\)

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (1)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/05-02-et-raminvest-holding-advances-mauritania-gold-exploration-following-50-14--50330087-1c47-4c76-ae56-da435b290699#fact-drill-facts-0)

gold

#### Identity

- Commodity: gold

#### Geometry

- Grade: 50.14
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 50.14 g/t gold is an exceptional grade for gold exploration.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade

- Negative factor: Surface sampling only

Evidence · text

> sampling returned assay values of up to 50.14 g/t gold

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.